Microcarrier-controlled-microfluidic chip for microsphere single-pass applications by hot embossing lithography

2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 043009
Author(s):  
Ruixia Yang
2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-102
Author(s):  
Huaibo Qu ◽  
Ruixia Yang ◽  
Suying Yao ◽  
Peng Gao

2007 ◽  
Vol 339 ◽  
pp. 246-251
Author(s):  
L.Q. Du ◽  
C. Liu ◽  
H.J. Liu ◽  
J. Qin ◽  
N. Li ◽  
...  

Micro hot embossing mold of microfluidic chip used in flow cytometry is designed and microfabricated. After some kinds of microfabrication processes are tried, this paper presents a novel microfabrication technology of micro hot embossing metal mold. Micro metal mold is fabricated by low-cost UV-LIGA surface micro fabrication process using negative thick photoresist, SU-8. Different from other micro hot embossing molds, the micro mold with vertical sidewalls is fabricated by micro nickel electroforming directly on Nickel base. Based on the micro Nickel mold and automation fabrication system, high precision and mass-producing microfluidic chips have been fabricated and they have been used in flow cytometry


2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 457-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boe-Yu Pemg ◽  
Chih-Wei Wu ◽  
Yung-Kang Shen ◽  
Yi Lin

2010 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mao-Suan Huang ◽  
Yuh-Chyun Chiang ◽  
Sheng-Chieh Lin ◽  
Hsin-Chung Cheng ◽  
Chiung-Fang Huang ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 607 ◽  
pp. 547-550
Author(s):  
Yi Chu Hsu ◽  
Po Yuan Cheng ◽  
Hsiao Wei Lee ◽  
Shun Fua Su

We investigated two processes to fabricate unsaturated polyesters, UP, to serve as a stamp to emboss a microfluidic chip to apply to a peristaltic micropump. The mechanical properties of UP are great to apply to vibration type micro-actuators. However, it’s rarely discussed academically. As a result, we proposed two processes developed and compared macro-and micro-scopically. It was first observed that process I of traditional UP curing process and process II of modified process can both replicate the geometries of microfludic chips well macroscopically. In addition, the former one has macroscopic defaults like cracks, bend, and separation between vessel and UP molds, while the latter one doesn’t. Optical microscope and confocal microscope are also applied to verify the replication effects microscopically. Again, both processes illustrate good replication results with variation of both lengths and areas all less than 10%, while process II has better geometries and lower deviation on different sites. The process I was proven that the averages of depth and widest width change rates for replication are-1.06% (between-4.15% and 2.89%) and-2.77% (between-6.93% and 0.67%), respectively. And, the replication results of process II shows also reasonable change and even smaller deviations that the averages of depth and widest width change rates are-4.77% (between-6.33% and-3.84%) and 1.53% (between 1.15% and 2.15%), respectively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document