opinion response
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

19
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Alexandre Magno da Rocha Vianna

Observation of the multisensory experience using fMRI, EEG and analysis of users’ responses using Fuzzy logic. The tabulation of these data aims to verify the responses and quantify them for comparison with a personal opinion survey using the SAATY scale and apply in general terms (opinion response and neural response) in other users belonging to the same group of people. Based on the data and processes of the described applications, a sensory mapping of the observer and verification of “patterns in neurophysiological processes” can be performed with a verbal response, in addition to allowing the understanding of the importance of these patterns for the selection of an option.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 126070
Author(s):  
Ramon Rossello-Mora ◽  
Konstantinos T. Konstantinidis ◽  
Iain Sutcliffe ◽  
William Whitman

2019 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 690-722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Clifford ◽  
Yongkwang Kim ◽  
Brian W Sullivan

Abstract  In an era of increasing partisan polarization and media fragmentation, interest in the causes of conspiracy beliefs has been growing rapidly. However, there is little consensus on how to measure these beliefs. Researchers typically present respondents with a conspiratorial statement, then assess their endorsement of the statement using an agree-disagree scale, a true-false scale, or some other variant. Researchers sometimes include a no-opinion response option and sometimes do not. Yet, there is little evidence as to the best format. In this article, we argue that common measures not only are challenging for respondents to answer, but also inflate estimates of conspiracy belief among the mass public. We introduce an alternative measure that presents respondents with an explicit choice between a conspiratorial and a conventional explanation for an event. Across three studies, the explicit choice format reduces no-opinion responding and reduces estimates of conspiracy belief, particularly among those low in political knowledge or cognitive reflection. These results suggest that previous findings may be inflated due to measurement artifacts. This evidence suggests that researchers adopt the explicit choice format for measuring conspiracy beliefs and provide a no-opinion response option.


Decyzje ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 115-133
Author(s):  
Anna Matel ◽  
◽  
Tomasz Poskrobko ◽  

2009 ◽  
Vol 62 (6) ◽  
pp. 427-427
Author(s):  
Edward E. Winger ◽  
Jane L. Reed
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document