understory tree
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

40
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

11
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Forests ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 512
Author(s):  
Xuemei Wang ◽  
Zhiwen Guo ◽  
Xin Guo ◽  
Xiangping Wang

Exploring carbon allocation pattern and its influencing factors is of great significance for estimating the carbon sequestration rate and potential of forest ecosystems. Here, we investigate all carbon pool components (including above and belowground biomass of tree, shrub and herb layers, and dead biomass and soil carbon pools) in four successional stages of broad-leaved and Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis Siebold & Zucc.) mixed forests in Northeast China. We explore the change of allocation among carbon pools with succession and examine the relative importance of succession, stand age, and stand factors on carbon allocation pattern. Our results illustrate that above- and belowground vegetation carbon increase as maximum tree height increases. Below- to aboveground vegetation carbon ratio (R/S ratio) decreases significantly with succession and increases significantly as mean diameter at breast height (DBH) increases, but does not significantly correlate with stand age. With succession and increasing stand age, understory (shrub, herb) to tree carbon ratio (understory/tree ratio) and soil to vegetation carbon ratio (soil/vegetation ratio) decrease significantly. The joint effect of succession, stand age, and stand factors have the largest contribution on above- and belowground vegetation carbon and understory/tree ratio (26.83%, 27.93%, and 49.48% of variations explained, respectively). As for the pure effects, stand factors explain the largest proportion of variations in vegetation aboveground carbon (11.25%) and soil carbon (20.18%). Meanwhile, succession is the variable with the largest contribution to vegetation belowground carbon (12.64%), R/S ratio (21.83%), understory/tree ratio (25.84%), and soil/vegetation ratio (6.68%). Overall, these results suggest that species composition change during forest succession, instead of stand factors and stand age, is the main driver of forest vegetation carbon allocation. In contrast, stand factors play a major role in soil carbon allocation. Our findings suggest more studies to better understand the role of species composition (in addition to stand factors and age) on biomass allocation, and the influence of stand factors and litterfalls on soil carbon sequestration, which are critical to improve forest management strategies (e.g., adjustment of species composition and forest structure) to increase the future ability of forest carbon sequestration.


2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 2529-2532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus Braun ◽  
Tiago Esposito ◽  
Bruno Huettel ◽  
Andrea Pedrosa Harand

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 43118
Author(s):  
Maria Regina Torres Boeger ◽  
Daiane Maria Pilatti ◽  
Carolina Sereneski de Lima ◽  
Allan Mauricio Sanches Baptista de Alvarenga ◽  
Suelen Cristina Alves da Silva Pereto

2016 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bayron R. Calle-Rendón ◽  
Mika Peck ◽  
Sara E. Bennett ◽  
Citlalli Morelos-Juarez ◽  
Felipe Alfonso

There is increasing evidence that large-bodied primates play important roles as seed dispersers and in the maintenance of tree diversity in forest ecosystems. In this study we compared forest regeneration at two sites with differing primate abundances in the Ecuadorian Chocoan rainforest. We predicted: (1) significant differences in primate abundance between the two sites; (2) higher understory tree species richness and density at the site with greater primate abundance; (3) the site with lower primate abundance characterized by tree species dispersed by non-primate biotic agents and/or abiotic factors. We compared two sites, Tesoro Escondido (TE) a campesino cooperative, and the El Pambilar (EP) wildlife refuge that both maintain populations of mantled howler monkey (Alouatta palliata), the brown-headed spider monkey (Ateles fusciceps fusciceps) and the capuchin monkey (Cebus capucinus). We characterized canopy structure by point-quadrant sampling, determined primate abundance and sampled seedlings/saplings in 1 m2 plots, classifying tree species based on three dispersal syndromes: adapted for primate dispersal, dispersed by other biological agents, and abiotic dispersal. We compared sites in terms of primate abundance (groups and individuals observed per day) and regeneration characteristics (overall density, species richness, and dispersal syndrome). We carried out within site comparisons and constructed understory tree species accumulation curves. Overall the forests were structurally similar - with significantly higher densities of A. f. fusciceps at TE. Encounter rates for the other two primate species were similar at both sites. Understory tree density and species richness was significantly higher in TE with no stabilization of tree species accumulation curves. The species accumulation curve for understory trees at EP stabilized. Higher densities and species richness of primate dispersed tree species were observed at TE, with non-primate biotically dispersed tree species the dominant dispersal syndrome at both sites. Our observations are consistent with those from other studies investigating the role of large-bodied frugivorous primates in forest regeneration, and point to a general pattern: future lowland tropical forest tree diversity depends on maintaining robust populations of large primate species in these systems. It is highly probable that the maintenance of high levels of tree diversity in Chocoan rainforests is dependent on the conservation of its largest resident primate, the critically endangered brown-headed spider monkey (A. f. fusciceps).


2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (17) ◽  
pp. 1576-1584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felipe Elli Elvis ◽  
Otomar Caron Braulio ◽  
Eloy Elder ◽  
Behling Alexandre ◽  
Queiróz de Souza Velci ◽  
...  

Plant Ecology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 217 (5) ◽  
pp. 471-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naomi Hosaka ◽  
Naoki Kachi ◽  
Hiroshi Kudoh ◽  
Josef F. Stuefer ◽  
Dennis F. Whigham

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flaviana Maluf Souza ◽  
Sergius Gandolfi ◽  
Ricardo Ribeiro Rodrigues

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 385-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Michael Anderson ◽  
Thomas Morrison ◽  
Deusdedith Rugemalila ◽  
Ricardo Holdo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document