calcifying odontogenic cyst
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

223
(FIVE YEARS 16)

H-INDEX

23
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Monir Moradzadeh Khiavi ◽  
Nazanin Mahdavi ◽  
Asoma Awudu

Author(s):  
Sushmitha S ◽  
V Ramesh ◽  
B Premalatha ◽  
K Ramadoss

Dentinogenic ghost cell tumors (DGCTs) are uncommon neoplasms classified as a solid variant of the calcifying odontogenic cyst and defined as a locally invasive neoplasm, characterized histologically by an ameloblastomatous epithelium with an area of ghost cell formation and a varying amount of dentinoid. Herein, we present the case of a 22-year old man who was referred to us due to recurrent swelling of right posterior mandibular region. The diagnosis of a DGCT was made by the use of advanced radiographic imaging and detailed histopathological examination.


Author(s):  
Sushmitha S ◽  
V Ramesh ◽  
B Premalatha ◽  
K Ramadoss

Dentinogenic ghost cell tumors (DGCTs) are uncommon neoplasms classified as a solid variant of the calcifying odontogenic cyst and defined as a locally invasive neoplasm, characterized histologically by an ameloblastomatous epithelium with an area of ghost cell formation and a varying amount of dentinoid. Herein, we present the case of a 22-year old man who was referred to us due to recurrent swelling of right posterior mandibular region. The diagnosis of a DGCT was made by the use of advanced radiographic imaging and detailed histopathological examination.


Author(s):  
Vizuete Bolaños Marco Xavier ◽  
Chavarría Fabiola Salgado ◽  
Ramírez Martínez Carla Monserrat ◽  
Ramos Nieto José de Jésus ◽  
Vázquez Dávalos Norma Michelle

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Megumi Isshiki‐Murakami ◽  
Hidetake Tachinami ◽  
Kei Tomihara ◽  
Akira Noguchi ◽  
Katsuhisa Sekido ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 80
Author(s):  
Regrina Setiawan ◽  
Ria Noerianingsih Firman ◽  
Lusi Epsilawati

Objectives: This review article is aimed to describe the radiographic features of CEOT and COC to determine the differences between the two lesions on panoramic radiographs. Review: This research is a descriptive study using scoping review method based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis for Scoping Review (PRISMA-Scr). This study examines English and Indonesian articles of CEOT and COC with panoramic radiography as a diagnostic tool published in 2015 – 2021. Relevant articles were obtained from searches using keywords and inclusion criteria on PubMed, PMC NCBI, and hand searching techniques. A total of 32 articles were identified at initial study identification. Duplication, title and abstract, and full-text inspection consecutively excluded 1, 3, and 8 articles. A total of 20 eligible articles were included in this study, 10 cases of Calcifying Epithelial Odontogenic Tumor and 10 cases of Calcifying Odontogenic Cyst. Conclusion: The differences between COC and CEOT on panoramic radiographs are COC is more commonly found in the anterior region than CEOT and COC tends to occur in the periapical or lateral part of adjacent teeth and causes root resorption, whereas CEOT tends to be located at the crown of impacted teeth. There aren’t any pathognomonic radiographic findings from the CEOT and COC, so a definitive diagnosis still requires histopathological analysis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 85 ◽  
pp. 106267
Author(s):  
Mainassara Chekaraou Samir ◽  
Gamra Lamiae ◽  
Chami Bassima

Author(s):  
Monir Moradzadeh Khiavi ◽  
Nazanin Mahdavi ◽  
ASOMA AWUDU

Developing odontoma is a rare mixed odontogenic tumor that can arise with other odontogenic lesions. The association of COC with ameloblastic fibro-odontoma is extremely rare. We report an extremely rare case of developing odontoma arising from a calcifying odontogenic cyst in a 17-year old girl.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document