Membuat Siswa Lebih Produktif Dalam Berbahasa “Accountable Talk”

<p><em>Abstrak - </em><strong>Fokus penelitian ini adalah tentang istilah <em>accountable talk</em> dalam berbahasa dan penerapannya dalam kelas. Istilah ini sering muncul dalam disiplin ilmu inovasi psikologi pendidikan. <em>Accountable talk</em> adalah tentang bagaimana membuat bahasa percakapan peserta didik lebih produktif dalam ranah akademik dan sosial. Signifikansi penelitian ini adalah seringkali ketidak mampuan bernalar dengan baik menghalangi proses pembelajaran melalui pembicaraan.Beberapa pertanyaan paling mendasar dari penelitian ini adalah tentang bagaimana cara membuat siswa dapat berbicara untuk pengambilan keputusan sosial dan untuk mempelajari disiplin akademik yang kompleks. Untuk mengembangkan keduanya dalam kapasitas individu dan masyarakat sehingga dapat menggunakan bahasa secara produktif. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kepustakaan (<em>library research</em>), yakni suatu penelitian yang pengumpulan datanya dilakukan dengan menghimpun data dari berbagai literatur. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah <em>interdisciplinary approach</em> yaitu pendekatan yang menggunakan tinjauan berbagai sudut pandang ilmu yang serumpun. Berbicara menggunakan bahasa yang dapat membangun sebuah pikiran sangatlah penting dalam pengambilan keputusan sosial dan dalam mempelajari disiplin akademik yang komplek. Yang terpenting adalah bagaimana seseorang membuat percakapan yang rasional sehingga mudah untuk dipelajari oleh semua orang. Para siswa tidak hanya dituntut untuk menguasai tubuh pengetahuan otoritatif saja (teori), tetapi juga harus bisa menggunakan bahasa yang baik, sehingga membuat mereka lebih produktif lagi dalam disiplin ilmu.</strong></p><p><em>Abstract </em>- <strong>The focus of this research is about the term accountable talk in the language and its application in the classroom. This term often appears in the disciplines of educational psychology innovation. Accountable talk is about how to make the language of conversation of students more productive in the academic and social realms. The significance of this research is that often the inability to reason properly prevents the learning process through conversation. Some of the most fundamental questions from this research are about how to make students able to speak for social decision making and to study complex academic disciplines. To develop both in the capacity of individuals and communities so that they can use the language productively. This research is library research (library research), which is a study in which data collection is done by collecting data from various literatures. The approach used is an interdisciplinary approach which is an approach that uses a review of various perspectives of allied science. Speaking using language that can build a mind is very important in social decision making and in learning complex academic disciplines. The important thing is how someone makes a rational conversation so it's easy for everyone to learn. Students are not only required to master the body of authoritative knowledge (theory), but also must be able to use good language, thus making them more productive in scientific disciplines.</strong></p><p><strong><em>Keywords - </em></strong><em>Accountable, Language, Student</em></p>

Membuat Siswa Lebih Produktif Dalam Berbahasa “Accountable Talk”

<p><em>Abstrak - </em><strong>Fokus penelitian ini adalah tentang istilah <em>accountable talk</em> dalam berbahasa dan penerapannya dalam kelas. Istilah ini sering muncul dalam disiplin ilmu inovasi psikologi pendidikan. <em>Accountable talk</em> adalah tentang bagaimana membuat bahasa percakapan peserta didik lebih produktif dalam ranah akademik dan sosial. Signifikansi penelitian ini adalah seringkali ketidak mampuan bernalar dengan baik menghalangi proses pembelajaran melalui pembicaraan. Beberapa pertanyaan paling mendasar dari penelitian ini adalah tentang bagaimana cara membuat siswa dapat berbicara untuk pengambilan keputusan sosial dan untuk mempelajari disiplin akademik yang kompleks. Untuk mengembangkan keduanya dalam kapasitas individu dan masyarakat sehingga dapat menggunakan bahasa secara produktif. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kepustakaan (<em>library research</em>), yakni suatu penelitian yang pengumpulan datanya dilakukan dengan menghimpun data dari berbagai literatur. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah <em>interdisciplinary approach</em> yaitu pendekatan yang menggunakan tinjauan berbagai sudut pandang ilmu yang serumpun. Berbicara menggunakan bahasa yang dapat membangun sebuah pikiran sangatlah penting dalam pengambilan keputusan sosial dan dalam mempelajari disiplin akademik yang komplek. Yang terpenting adalah bagaimana seseorang membuat percakapan yang rasional sehingga mudah untuk dipelajari oleh semua orang. Para siswa tidak hanya dituntut untuk menguasai tubuh pengetahuan otoritatif saja (teori), tetapi juga harus bisa menggunakan bahasa yang baik, sehingga membuat mereka lebih produktif lagi dalam disiplin ilmu.</strong></p><p><em>Abstract </em>- <strong>The focus of this research is about the term accountable talk in the language and its application in the classroom. This term often appears in the disciplines of educational psychology innovation. Accountable talk is about how to make the language of conversation of students more productive in the academic and social realms. The significance of this research is that often the inability to reason properly prevents the learning process through conversation. Some of the most fundamental questions from this research are about how to make students able to speak for social decision making and to study complex academic disciplines. To develop both in the capacity of individuals and communities so that they can use the language productively. This research is library research (library research), which is a study in which data collection is done by collecting data from various literatures. The approach used is an interdisciplinary approach which is an approach that uses a review of various perspectives of allied science. Speaking using language that can build a mind is very important in social decision making and in learning complex academic disciplines. The important thing is how someone makes a rational conversation so it's easy for everyone to learn. Students are not only required to master the body of authoritative knowledge (theory), but also must be able to use good language, thus making them more productive in scientific disciplines.</strong></p><p><strong><em>Keywords - </em></strong><em>Accountable, Language, Student</em></p>

Investigating the effect of teacher mediation on student expressed reasoning

Understanding how chemistry teachers' interventions shape the reasoning that students express after a lesson is critical to support prospective and in-service teachers as they work with students' ideas in the classroom. In this qualitative research study, we analysed changes in the reasoning expressed by 10th grade students in a Chilean school in their written explanations about freezing point depression before and after a lesson on the topic. We also investigated how the teacher's interventions shaped the type of reasoning expressed by participating students. Our findings revealed significant shifts in the types of explanations generated after the lesson. A significant number of students transitioned from relational to simple causal reasoning in their pre- and post-lesson explanations. After the lesson most of the explanations were based on the activities of one or more of the system's entities. Analysis of teacher–student interactions during the observed lesson suggests that the teacher's mediation played a central role in the shift towards simple causal reasoning with centralized causality that was observed. The teacher in our study was more skilled at eliciting students' ideas than at helping students develop them with proper scaffolding. Thus, the observed classroom talk could not be considered as accountable talk, as most of the key ideas were introduced, selected, or reshaped by the teacher.

Trying to teach dialogically: The good, the bad, and the misguided

The goal of dialogic teaching is to position students as active participants who engage in academically accountable talk, but research consistently suggests that a major stumbling block is the teacher’s own interactional style. To explore the issue from an emic perspective, I carried out an action research investigation of advanced proficiency classes for English as a foreign language (EFL) that I taught on the university level in Japan. Data included audiotaped recordings of teacher-fronted whole-class discussions that were analysed qualitatively. I found that the effort to teach dialogically was somewhat successful, but missteps and misguided assumptions about effective instructional strategies were also evident. Findings point to both the complexities of orchestrating active engagement of reticent students within the third space of the second language (L2) classroom, and the critical role of teacher authority to elicit and coordinate student engagement.