Membuat Siswa Lebih Produktif Dalam Berbahasa “Accountable Talk”

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 168
Author(s):  
Herlambang Andi Prasetyo Aji

<p><em>Abstrak - </em><strong>Fokus penelitian ini adalah tentang istilah <em>accountable talk</em> dalam berbahasa dan penerapannya dalam kelas. Istilah ini sering muncul dalam disiplin ilmu inovasi psikologi pendidikan. <em>Accountable talk</em> adalah tentang bagaimana membuat bahasa percakapan peserta didik lebih produktif dalam ranah akademik dan sosial. Signifikansi penelitian ini adalah seringkali ketidak mampuan bernalar dengan baik menghalangi proses pembelajaran melalui pembicaraan. Beberapa pertanyaan paling mendasar dari penelitian ini adalah tentang bagaimana cara membuat siswa dapat berbicara untuk pengambilan keputusan sosial dan untuk mempelajari disiplin akademik yang kompleks. Untuk mengembangkan keduanya dalam kapasitas individu dan masyarakat sehingga dapat menggunakan bahasa secara produktif. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kepustakaan (<em>library research</em>), yakni suatu penelitian yang pengumpulan datanya dilakukan dengan menghimpun data dari berbagai literatur. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah <em>interdisciplinary approach</em> yaitu pendekatan yang menggunakan tinjauan berbagai sudut pandang ilmu yang serumpun. Berbicara menggunakan bahasa yang dapat membangun sebuah pikiran sangatlah penting dalam pengambilan keputusan sosial dan dalam mempelajari disiplin akademik yang komplek. Yang terpenting adalah bagaimana seseorang membuat percakapan yang rasional sehingga mudah untuk dipelajari oleh semua orang. Para siswa tidak hanya dituntut untuk menguasai tubuh pengetahuan otoritatif saja (teori), tetapi juga harus bisa menggunakan bahasa yang baik, sehingga membuat mereka lebih produktif lagi dalam disiplin ilmu.</strong></p><p><em>Abstract </em>- <strong>The focus of this research is about the term accountable talk in the language and its application in the classroom. This term often appears in the disciplines of educational psychology innovation. Accountable talk is about how to make the language of conversation of students more productive in the academic and social realms. The significance of this research is that often the inability to reason properly prevents the learning process through conversation. Some of the most fundamental questions from this research are about how to make students able to speak for social decision making and to study complex academic disciplines. To develop both in the capacity of individuals and communities so that they can use the language productively. This research is library research (library research), which is a study in which data collection is done by collecting data from various literatures. The approach used is an interdisciplinary approach which is an approach that uses a review of various perspectives of allied science. Speaking using language that can build a mind is very important in social decision making and in learning complex academic disciplines. The important thing is how someone makes a rational conversation so it's easy for everyone to learn. Students are not only required to master the body of authoritative knowledge (theory), but also must be able to use good language, thus making them more productive in scientific disciplines.</strong></p><p><strong><em>Keywords - </em></strong><em>Accountable, Language, Student</em></p>

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 168
Author(s):  
Herlambang Andi Prasetyo Aji

<p><em>Abstrak - </em><strong>Fokus penelitian ini adalah tentang istilah <em>accountable talk</em> dalam berbahasa dan penerapannya dalam kelas. Istilah ini sering muncul dalam disiplin ilmu inovasi psikologi pendidikan. <em>Accountable talk</em> adalah tentang bagaimana membuat bahasa percakapan peserta didik lebih produktif dalam ranah akademik dan sosial. Signifikansi penelitian ini adalah seringkali ketidak mampuan bernalar dengan baik menghalangi proses pembelajaran melalui pembicaraan.Beberapa pertanyaan paling mendasar dari penelitian ini adalah tentang bagaimana cara membuat siswa dapat berbicara untuk pengambilan keputusan sosial dan untuk mempelajari disiplin akademik yang kompleks. Untuk mengembangkan keduanya dalam kapasitas individu dan masyarakat sehingga dapat menggunakan bahasa secara produktif. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kepustakaan (<em>library research</em>), yakni suatu penelitian yang pengumpulan datanya dilakukan dengan menghimpun data dari berbagai literatur. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah <em>interdisciplinary approach</em> yaitu pendekatan yang menggunakan tinjauan berbagai sudut pandang ilmu yang serumpun. Berbicara menggunakan bahasa yang dapat membangun sebuah pikiran sangatlah penting dalam pengambilan keputusan sosial dan dalam mempelajari disiplin akademik yang komplek. Yang terpenting adalah bagaimana seseorang membuat percakapan yang rasional sehingga mudah untuk dipelajari oleh semua orang. Para siswa tidak hanya dituntut untuk menguasai tubuh pengetahuan otoritatif saja (teori), tetapi juga harus bisa menggunakan bahasa yang baik, sehingga membuat mereka lebih produktif lagi dalam disiplin ilmu.</strong></p><p><em>Abstract </em>- <strong>The focus of this research is about the term accountable talk in the language and its application in the classroom. This term often appears in the disciplines of educational psychology innovation. Accountable talk is about how to make the language of conversation of students more productive in the academic and social realms. The significance of this research is that often the inability to reason properly prevents the learning process through conversation. Some of the most fundamental questions from this research are about how to make students able to speak for social decision making and to study complex academic disciplines. To develop both in the capacity of individuals and communities so that they can use the language productively. This research is library research (library research), which is a study in which data collection is done by collecting data from various literatures. The approach used is an interdisciplinary approach which is an approach that uses a review of various perspectives of allied science. Speaking using language that can build a mind is very important in social decision making and in learning complex academic disciplines. The important thing is how someone makes a rational conversation so it's easy for everyone to learn. Students are not only required to master the body of authoritative knowledge (theory), but also must be able to use good language, thus making them more productive in scientific disciplines.</strong></p><p><strong><em>Keywords - </em></strong><em>Accountable, Language, Student</em></p>


1999 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 283-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
John H. Schumann

In the nervous system, the orbitofrontal cortex, the amygdala, and the body proper are involved in personal and social decision making. Since normal conversational interaction involves making personal and social decisions on a moment to moment basis about what to say and how to say it, it is proposed that these areas of the nervous system, which subserve stimulus appraisal, attachment, affect regulation, and social cognition, also subserve decision making in language pragmatics.


2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Handgraaf ◽  
Eric van Dijk ◽  
Riël C. Vermunt ◽  
Henk Wilke ◽  
Carsten K. W. De Dreu

Author(s):  
Xinmu Hu ◽  
Xiaoqin Mai

Abstract Social value orientation (SVO) characterizes stable individual differences by an inherent sense of fairness in outcome allocations. Using the event-related potential (ERP), this study investigated differences in fairness decision-making behavior and neural bases between individuals with prosocial and proself orientations using the Ultimatum Game (UG). Behavioral results indicated that prosocials were more prone to rejecting unfair offers with stronger negative emotional reactions compared with proselfs. ERP results revealed that prosocials showed a larger P2 when receiving fair offers than unfair ones in a very early processing stage, whereas such effect was absent in proselfs. In later processing stages, although both groups were sensitive to fairness as reflected by an enhanced medial frontal negativity (MFN) for unfair offers and a larger P3 for fair offers, prosocials exhibited a stronger fairness effect on these ERP components relative to proselfs. Furthermore, the fairness effect on the MFN mediated the SVO effect on rejecting unfair offers. Findings regarding emotional experiences, behavioral patterns, and ERPs provide compelling evidence that SVO modulates fairness processing in social decision-making, whereas differences in neural responses to unfair vs. fair offers as evidenced by the MFN appear to play important roles in the SVO effect on behavioral responses to unfairness.


1986 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 500-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chia-chen Chao ◽  
George P. Knight ◽  
Alan F. Dubro

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document