Uniqueness Point Effects during Speech Planning in Adults Who Do and Do Not Stutter

2017 ◽  
Vol 69 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 191-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey A. Coalson ◽  
Courtney T. Byrd ◽  
Amanda Kuylen
1991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monique Radeau ◽  
Jose Morais ◽  
Philippe Mousty ◽  
Marco Saerens ◽  
Paul Bertelson
Keyword(s):  

Nature ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregg A. Castellucci ◽  
Christopher K. Kovach ◽  
Matthew A. Howard ◽  
Jeremy D. W. Greenlee ◽  
Michael A. Long
Keyword(s):  

Cognition ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 105 (2) ◽  
pp. 457-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Özdemir ◽  
Ardi Roelofs ◽  
Willem J.M. Levelt

2019 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 357-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias J Sjerps ◽  
Caitlin Decuyper ◽  
Antje S Meyer

In everyday conversation, interlocutors often plan their utterances while listening to their conversational partners, thereby achieving short gaps between their turns. Important issues for current psycholinguistics are how interlocutors distribute their attention between listening and speech planning and how speech planning is timed relative to listening. Laboratory studies addressing these issues have used a variety of paradigms, some of which have involved using recorded speech to which participants responded, whereas others have involved interactions with confederates. This study investigated how this variation in the speech input affected the participants’ timing of speech planning. In Experiment 1, participants responded to utterances produced by a confederate, who sat next to them and looked at the same screen. In Experiment 2, they responded to recorded utterances of the same confederate. Analyses of the participants’ speech, their eye movements, and their performance in a concurrent tapping task showed that, compared with recorded speech, the presence of the confederate increased the processing load for the participants, but did not alter their global sentence planning strategy. These results have implications for the design of psycholinguistic experiments and theories of listening and speaking in dyadic settings.


2007 ◽  
Vol 60 (8) ◽  
pp. 1155-1167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tania Malouf ◽  
Sachiko Kinoshita

Two experiments investigated whether priming due to a match in just the onset between a masked prime and target is found with high-frequency target words. Forster and Davis (1991, Exp. 5) reported that the masked onset priming effect was absent for high-frequency words and used the finding to argue that the effect has its locus in the grapheme–phoneme mapping process that operates serially within the nonlexical route. Experiment 1 used primes that were unrelated to targets and found a masked onset priming effect of equal size for high-frequency and low-frequency target words. Experiment 2 used form-related primes as used by Forster and Davis, and again found that the effect of onset mismatch was not dependent on target word frequency. These results are interpreted in terms of an alternative view that the masked onset priming effect has its origin in the process of preparing a speech response.


2015 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 324-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
April Jacobs ◽  
Melinda Fricke ◽  
Judith F. Kroll

2006 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett Miller ◽  
Barbara J. Juhasz ◽  
Keith Rayner

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document