Language control in regional dialect speakers – monolingual by name, bilingual by nature?

While research on bilingual language processing is sensitive to different usage contexts, monolinguals are still often treated as a homogeneous control group, despite frequently using multiple varieties that may require engagement of control mechanisms during lexical access. Adapting a language-switching task for speakers of (Scottish) Standard English and Orcadian Scots, we demonstrate switch cost asymmetries with longer naming latencies when switching back into Orcadian. This pattern, which is reminiscent of unbalanced bilinguals, suggests that Orcadian is the dominant variety of these participants – despite the fact they might be regarded as English monolinguals because of sociolinguistic factors. In conjunction with the observed mixing cost and cognate facilitation effect (indicative of proactive language control and parallel language activation, respectively), these findings show that ‘monolinguals’ need to be scrutinised for routine use of different varieties to gain a better understanding of whether and how mechanisms underlying their lexical access resemble those of bilinguals.

CNTM-05. Left hemisphere gliomas induce a plastic bi-hemispheric language network further characterized by lobe specific glioma data

Primary brain tumors are among the most burdensome diagnoses patients can receive as they often carry with them externally obvious and significant detriments to motor and speech. The stroke model is severely limited by the inherent nature of the insult to the brain: binary, relatively instantaneous and defined by vascular boundaries. We instead have chosen to study glioma-induced neuroplasticity in patients with gliomas as presentation is over a significantly longer time course with a gradient of insult to language activation areas instead of immediate ablation. Chart review was conducted on 545 patients who completed fMRI imaging from 2013–2019 while completing 1+ of the following language tasks: antonyms, reading comprehension, rhyming, word generation and picture naming. A total of 117 patients’ fMRI scans were included in the final analysis which entailed both a cluster-based analysis in FSL and a 34 gyral, mask-based analysis using FEATquery. Right hemisphere gliomas (RHG) were first established as a reliable control group by averaging anatomically significant voxels across all five language tasks (LT) yielding a core conserved network. Left hemisphere gliomas (LHG) were then directly compared to the RHG language tasks. We found LHG induced global reorganization of the conserved language network with little evidence for direct homologous recruitment of functional structures. Instead, a generalized right hemisphere recruitment is observed with 87% of non-zero masks shifting their laterality index to the right hemisphere. Furthermore, in each of the five LT, the LHG activates fewer total suprathreshold voxels in both the mask and cluster based analyses while having a higher peak intensity within the activated clusters. A preliminary analysis of frontal LHG compared to temporal LHG reveals increased contralateral recruitment in the frontal subgroup with more direct homologous recruitment. This nuanced understanding of existing mechanisms for neuroplasticity can aid in our future intentional manipulation for therapeutic benefit.

Is there proactive inhibitory control during bilingual and bidialectal language production?

The bilingual language control literature generally assumes that cross-language interference resolution relies on inhibition of the non-target language. A similar approach has been taken in the bidialectal language control literature. However, there is little evidence along these lines for proactive language control, which entails a control process that is implemented as an anticipation of any cross-language interference. To further investigate the possibility of proactive inhibitory control, we examined the effect of language variety preparation time, by manipulating the cue-to-stimulus interval, on parallel language activation, by manipulating cognate status. If proactive language control relies on inhibition, one would expect less parallel language activation (i.e., a smaller cognate facilitation effect) with increased proactive inhibitory control (i.e., a long cue-to-stimulus interval). This was not the case with either bilinguals or bidialectals. So, the current study does not provide evidence for proactive inhibitory control during bilingual and bidialectal language production.

What Are the Modulators of Cross-Language Syntactic Activation During Natural Reading?

Bilinguals juggle knowledge of multiple languages, including syntactic constructions that can mismatch (e.g., the red car, la voiture rouge; Mary sees it, Mary le voit). We used eye-tracking to examine whether French-English (n = 23) and English-French (n = 21) bilingual adults activate non-target language syntax during English L2 (Experiment 1) and L1 (Experiment 2) reading, and whether this differed from functionally monolingual English reading (Experiment 3, n = 26). People read English sentences containing syntactic constructions that were either partially shared across languages (adjective-noun constructions) or completely unshared (object-pronoun constructions). These constructions were presented in an intact form, or in a violated form that was French-consistent or French-inconsistent. For both L2 and L1 reading, bilinguals read French-consistent adjective-noun violations relatively quickly, suggesting cross-language activation. This did not occur when the same people read object-pronoun constructions manipulated in the same manner. Surprisingly, English readers exposed to French in their lifetime but functionally monolingual, also read French-consistent violations for adjective-noun constructions faster, particularly for some items. However, when we controlled for item differences in the L2 and L1 reading data, cross-language effects observed were similar to the original data pattern. Moreover, individual differences in L2 experience modulated both L2 and L1 reading for adjective-noun constructions, consistent with a cross-language activation interpretation of the data. These findings are consistent with the idea of syntactic cross-language activation during reading for some constructions. However, for several reasons, cross-language syntactic activation during comprehension may be overall more variable and challenging to investigate methodologically compared to past work on other forms of cross-language activation (i.e., single words).

The Effect of Dual Language Activation on L2-Induced Changes in L1 Speech within a Code-Switched Paradigm

The present study sought to examine the effect of dual language activation on L1 speech in late English–Austrian German sequential bilinguals, and to identify relevant predictor variables. To this end, we compared the English speech patterns of adult migrants to Austria in a code-switched and monolingual condition alongside those of monolingual native speakers in England in a monolingual condition. In the code-switched materials, German words containing target segments known to trigger cross-linguistic interaction in the two languages (i.e., [v–w], [ʃt(ʁ)-st(ɹ)] and [l-ɫ]) were inserted into an English frame; monolingual materials comprised English words with the same segments. To examine whether the position of the German item affects L1 speech, the segments occurred either before the switch (“He wants a Wienerschnitzel”) or after (“I like Würstel with mustard”). Critical acoustic measures of these segments revealed no differences between the groups in the monolingual condition, but significant L2-induced shifts in the bilinguals’ L1 speech production in the code-switched condition for some sounds. These were found to occur both before and after a code-switch, and exhibited a fair amount of individual variation. Only the amount of L2 use was found to be a significant predictor variable for shift size in code-switched compared with monolingual utterances, and only for [w]. These results have important implications for the role of dual activation in the speech of late sequential bilinguals.

Is there proactive inhibitory control during bilingual and bidialectal language production?

The bilingual language control literature generally assumes that cross-language interference resolution relies on inhibition of the non-target language. A similar approach has been taken in the bidialectal language control literature. However, there is little evidence along these lines for proactive language control, which entails a control process that is implemented as an anticipation of any cross-language interference. To further investigate the possibility of proactive inhibitory control, we examined the effect of language variety preparation time, by manipulating the cue-to-stimulus interval, on parallel language activation, by manipulating cognate status. If proactive language control relies on inhibition, one would expect less parallel language activation (i.e., a smaller cognate facilitation effect) with increased proactive inhibitory control (i.e., a long cue-to-stimulus interval). This was not the case with either bilinguals or bidialectals. So, the current study does not provide evidence for proactive inhibitory control during bilingual and bidialectal language production.

How a picture becomes a word: individual differences in the development of language-mediated visual search

Over the course of our lifetimes, we accumulate extensive experience associating the things that we see with the words we have learned to describe them. As a result, adults engaged in a visual search task will often look at items with labels that share phonological features with the target object, demonstrating that language can become activated even in non-linguistic contexts. This highly interactive cognitive system is the culmination of our linguistic and visual experiences—and yet, our understanding of how the relationship between language and vision develops remains limited. The present study explores the developmental trajectory of language-mediated visual search by examining whether children can be distracted by linguistic competitors during a non-linguistic visual search task. Though less robust compared to what has been previously observed with adults, we find evidence of phonological competition in children as young as 8 years old. Furthermore, the extent of language activation is predicted by individual differences in linguistic, visual, and domain-general cognitive abilities, with the greatest phonological competition observed among children with strong language abilities combined with weaker visual memory and inhibitory control. We propose that linguistic expertise is fundamental to the development of language-mediated visual search, but that the rate and degree of automatic language activation depends on interactions among a broader network of cognitive abilities.

Spoken language comprehension activates the primary visual cortex

Current accounts of neural plasticity emphasize the role of connectivity and conserved function in determining a neural tissue’s functional role even after atypical early experiences. However, in apparent conflict with this view, studies of congenitally blind individuals have also suggested that language activates primary visual cortex, with no evidence of major changes in anatomical connectivity that could explain this apparent drastic functional change in what is typically a low-level visual area. To reconcile what appears to be unprecedented functional reorganization in V1 with known accounts of plasticity limitations, we tested whether primary visual cortex also responds to spoken language in sighted individuals. We found that primary visual cortex was activated by comprehensible speech as compared to a reversed speech control task, in a left-lateralized and focal manner, in sighted individuals. Importantly, left V1 activation was also significant and comparable for abstract and concrete words, precluding a visual imagery account of such activation. Together these findings suggest that primary visual cortex responds to verbal information in the typically developed brain, potentially to predict visual input. This capability might be the basis for the strong V1 language activation observed in people born blind, re-affirming the notion that plasticity is guided by pre-existing connectivity and abilities in the intact brain.