Aerial image simulations of soft and phase defects in 193-nm lithography for 100-nm node

Author(s):  
Frank A. Driessen ◽  
Paul van Adrichem ◽  
Vicky Philipsen ◽  
Rik M. Jonckheere ◽  
Hua-Yu Liu ◽  
...  
2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel M. Zibold ◽  
Thomas Scheruebl ◽  
Wolfgang Harnisch ◽  
Robert Brunner ◽  
J. Greif

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel M. Zibold ◽  
Thomas Scheruebl ◽  
Alexander Menck ◽  
Robert Brunner ◽  
J. Greif

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel M. Zibold ◽  
Rainer Schmid ◽  
Klaus Boehm ◽  
Robert Birkner
Keyword(s):  

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anja Rosenbusch ◽  
Shirley Hemar ◽  
Reuven Falah
Keyword(s):  

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christof G. Krautschik ◽  
Masaaki Ito ◽  
Iwao Nishiyama ◽  
Takashi Mori

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel M. Zibold ◽  
Wolfgang Harnisch ◽  
Thomas Scheruebl ◽  
Norbert Rosenkranz ◽  
Joern Greif

Author(s):  
J. A. Eades

For well over two decades computers have played an important role in electron microscopy; they now pervade the whole field - as indeed they do in so many other aspects of our lives. The initial use of computers was mainly for large (as it seemed then) off-line calculations for image simulations; for example, of dislocation images.Image simulation has continued to be one of the most notable uses of computers particularly since it is essential to the correct interpretation of high resolution images. In microanalysis, too, the computer has had a rather high profile. In this case because it has been a necessary part of the equipment delivered by manufacturers. By contrast the use of computers for electron diffraction analysis has been slow to prominence. This is not to say that there has been no activity, quite the contrary; however it has not had such a great impact on the field.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document