Atomic-order thermal nitridation of Si(100) and subsequent growth of Si

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 1907-1911 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Watanabe ◽  
M. Sakuraba ◽  
T. Matsuura ◽  
J. Murota
1998 ◽  
Vol 145 (12) ◽  
pp. 4252-4256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Watanabe ◽  
Akihiro Ichikawa ◽  
Masao Sakuraba ◽  
Takashi Matsuura ◽  
Junichi Murota

2014 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Murota ◽  
M. Sakuraba ◽  
B. Tillack

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
pp. 1205-1210
Author(s):  
Nao Akiyama ◽  
Masao Sakuraba ◽  
J. Murota

1977 ◽  
Vol 74 ◽  
pp. 989-996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlyse Gomez ◽  
Marie-Claire Bellissent-Funel ◽  
Pierre Desre

1995 ◽  
Vol 05 (C8) ◽  
pp. C8-973-C8-978
Author(s):  
M. Jurado ◽  
Ll. Mañosa ◽  
A. González-Comas ◽  
C. Stassis ◽  
A. Planes

Plants ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 997
Author(s):  
Tatsuro Suzuki ◽  
Takahiro Hara ◽  
Kenjiro Katsu

Buckwheat is recognized as an important traditional crop and supports local economies in several regions around the world. Buckwheat is used, for example, as a cereal grain, noodle and bread. In addition, buckwheat is also used as a sprout or a young seedling. For these foods, sprouting is an important characteristic that affects food quality. For foods made from buckwheat flour, pre-harvest sprouting may decrease yield, which also leads to the deterioration of noodle quality. Breeding buckwheat that is resistant to pre-harvest sprouting is therefore required. Germination and subsequent growth are also important characteristics of the quality of sprouts. Although buckwheat sprouts are the focus because they contain many functional compounds, such as rutin, several problems have been noted, such as thin hypocotyls and husks remaining on sprouts. To date, several new varieties have been developed to resolve these quality issues. In this review, we summarize and introduce research on the breeding of buckwheat related to quality, sprouting and subsequent sprout growth.


1976 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
pp. 2089-2096 ◽  
Author(s):  
John G. Stockner ◽  
Naval J. Antia

Examples are cited from the literature of phytoplankton-related pollution and nutrition studies where the possibility of successful adaptation and subsequent growth could have been overlooked because of insufficient duration of algal exposure to the pollutant or nutrient tested. We present evidence from our investigations where: a) initial algal exposures as long as 20–40 days to the pollutant or alternative nutrient may be required for successful adaptation, and b) phytoplankters initially tolerating only a low level of pollutant concentration could be trained to accept severalfold higher levels by repeated exposure to gradually increasing pollutant concentration A plea is made for future investigators to recognize the importance of long-term bioassays ascertaining algal potential for adaptation, in order that their results may be ecologically realistic for the purpose of environmental protection against chronic pollution and eutrophication. The short-term "shock" response should be clearly distinguished from the long-term habituation response of phytoplankters to the test chemical in these bioassays. Possible problems raising questionable objections to the long-term bioassay approach are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document