scholarly journals Dorsal Hippocampus Not Always Necessary in a Radial Arm Maze Delayed Win-shift Task

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dylan Layfield ◽  
Nathan Sidell ◽  
Afnan Abdullahi ◽  
Ehren L. Newman

AbstractSpatial working memory is important for foraging and navigating the environment. However, its neural underpinnings remain poorly understood. The hippocampus, known for its spatial coding and involvement in spatial memory, is widely understood to be necessary for spatial working memory when retention intervals increase beyond seconds into minutes. Here, we describe new evidence that the dorsal hippocampus is not always necessary for spatial working memory for retention intervals of 8 minutes. Rats were trained to perform a delayed spatial win shift radial arm maze task (DSWS) with an 8-minute delay between study and test phases. We then tested whether bilateral inactivation of the dorsal hippocampus between the study and test phases impaired behavioral performance at test. Inactivation was achieved through a bilateral infusion of lidocaine. Performance following lidocaine was compared to control trials, in which, sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS) was infused. Test performance did not differ between the lidocaine and PBS conditions, remaining high in each. To explore the possibility that this insensitivity to inactivation was a result of overtraining, a second cohort of animals received substantially less training prior to the infusions. In this second cohort, lidocaine infusions did significantly impair task performance. These data indicate that successful performance of a spatial win-shift task on the 8-arm maze need not always be hippocampally dependent.

2015 ◽  
Vol 135 (2) ◽  
pp. 357-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Shu ◽  
Guo-qing Zheng ◽  
Xiaona Wang ◽  
Yanyun Sun ◽  
Yushan Liu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 1076-1081
Author(s):  
Brian C. Kavanaugh ◽  
Alexa Fryc ◽  
Linda L. Carpenter

AbstractDespite the critical role of working memory (WM) in neuropsychiatric conditions, there remains a dearth of available WM-targeted interventions. Gamma and theta oscillations as measured with electroencephalography (EEG) or magnetoencephalography (MEG) reflect the neural underpinnings of WM. The WM processes that fluctuate in conjunction with WM demands are closely correlated with WM test performance, and their EEG signatures are abnormal in several clinical populations. Novel interventions such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) have been shown to modulate these oscillations and subsequently improve WM performance and clinical symptoms. Systematically identifying pathological WM-related gamma/theta oscillatory patterns with EEG/MEG and developing ways to target them with interventions such as TMS is an active area of clinical research. Results hold promise for enhancing the outcomes of our patients with WM deficits and for moving the field of clinical neuropsychology towards a mechanism-based approach.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. e62458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Helene Richter ◽  
Benjamin Zeuch ◽  
Katja Lankisch ◽  
Peter Gass ◽  
Daniel Durstewitz ◽  
...  

Hippocampus ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-129
Author(s):  
Dylan Layfield ◽  
Nathan Sidell ◽  
Afnan Abdullahi ◽  
Ehren L. Newman

Author(s):  
Yogesh D. Aher ◽  
Saraswathi Subramaniyan ◽  
Bharanidharan Shanmugasundaram ◽  
Ajinkya Sase ◽  
Sivaprakasam R. Saroja ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
pp. 1575-1587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua D. Berke ◽  
Jason T. Breck ◽  
Howard Eichenbaum

The striatum and hippocampus are widely held to be components of distinct memory systems that can guide competing behavioral strategies. However, some electrophysiological studies have suggested that neurons in both structures encode spatial information and may therefore make similar contributions to behavior. In rats well trained to perform a win-stay radial maze task, we recorded simultaneously from dorsal hippocampus and from multiple striatal subregions, including both lateral areas implicated in motor responses to cues and medial areas that work cooperatively with hippocampus in cognitive operations. In each brain region, movement through the maze was accompanied by the continuous sequential activation of sets of projection neurons. Hippocampal neurons overwhelmingly were active at a single spatial location (place cells). Striatal projection neurons were active at discrete points within the progression of every trial—especially during choices or following reward delivery—regardless of spatial position. Place-cell–type firing was not observed even for medial striatal cells entrained to the hippocampal theta rhythm. We also examined neural coding in earlier training sessions, when rats made use of spatial working memory to guide choices, and again found that striatal cells did not show place-cell–type firing. Prospective or retrospective encoding of trajectory was not observed in either hippocampus or striatum, at either training stage. Our results indicate that, at least in this task, dorsal hippocampus uses a spatial foundation for information processing that is not substantially modulated by spatial working memory demands. By contrast, striatal cells do not use such a spatial foundation, even in medial subregions that cooperate with hippocampus in the selection of spatial strategies. The progressive dominance of a striatum-dependent strategy does not appear to be accompanied by large changes in striatal or hippocampal single-cell representations, suggesting that the conflict between strategies may be resolved elsewhere.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document