scholarly journals Low-frequency noise assessment in advanced UTBOX SOI nMOSFETs with different gate dielectrics

2014 ◽  
Vol 97 ◽  
pp. 14-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.D. dos Santos ◽  
B. Cretu ◽  
V. Strobel ◽  
J.-M. Routoure ◽  
R. Carin ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. N25-N31 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Claeys ◽  
R. Ritzenthaler ◽  
T. Schram ◽  
H. Arimura ◽  
N. Horiguchi ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 823-828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gino Giusi ◽  
F. Crupi ◽  
C. Pace ◽  
C. Ciofi ◽  
G. Groeseneken

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. N27-N31 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Simoen ◽  
R. Ritzenthaler ◽  
M.-J. Cho ◽  
T. Schram ◽  
N. Horiguchi ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 48 (12) ◽  
pp. 2271-2275 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. von Haartman ◽  
D. Wu ◽  
B.G. Malm ◽  
P.-E. Hellström ◽  
S.-L. Zhang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 67 (11) ◽  
pp. 4802-4807
Author(s):  
Alberto Oliveira ◽  
Anabela Veloso ◽  
Cor Claeys ◽  
Naoto Horiguchi ◽  
Eddy Simoen

1982 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 97-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Benton ◽  
H.G. Leventhall

The role played by loudness in the assessment of annoyance is seen to effect an intensity dominated concept current in noise assessment practices. Such dominance is not supported by the complex processing nature of the auditory system. The individual is placed within a context which requires the auditory system to align the person to external stimuli whilst maintaining the production of appropriate behaviours. Development of the concepts associated with audition is a pre-requisite to establishing viable noise assessment criteria. The limitations of present day criteria, with an accepted assumption of intensity as the key parameter, are accentuated when assessments are made of low level low frequency noise. Once the individual is viewed as an active processor, bodily parameters may also serve to provide indices which are derived from the amount of ‘processor work’.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document