surface exclusion
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

44
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

19
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Vol 432 (20) ◽  
pp. 5681-5695
Author(s):  
Andreas Schmitt ◽  
Helmut Hirt ◽  
Michael A. Järvå ◽  
Wei-Sheng Sun ◽  
Josy ter Beek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Andreas Schmitt ◽  
Helmut Hirt ◽  
Michael A. Järvå ◽  
Wei-Sheng Sun ◽  
Josy ter Beek ◽  
...  

AbstractHorizontal gene transfer between Gram-positive bacteria leads to a rapid spread of virulence factors and antibiotic resistance. This transfer is often facilitated via Type 4 Secretion Systems (T4SS), which frequently are encoded on conjugative plasmids. However, donor cells that already contain a particular conjugative plasmid resist acquisition of a 2nd copy of said plasmid. They utilize different mechanisms, including surface exclusion for this purpose. Enterococcus faecalis PrgA, encoded by the conjugative plasmid pCF10, is a surface protein that has been implicated to play a role in both virulence and surface exclusion, but the mechanism by which this is achieved has not been fully explained. Here, we report the structure of full-length PrgA, which shows that PrgA protrudes far out from the cell wall (approximately 40 nm), where it presents a protease domain. In vivo experiments show that PrgA provides a physical barrier to cellular adhesion, thereby reducing cellular aggregation. This function of PrgA contributes to surface exclusion, reducing the uptake of its cognate plasmid by approximately one order of magnitude. Using variants of PrgA with mutations in the catalytic site we show that the surface exclusion effect is dependent on the activity of the protease domain of PrgA. In silico analysis suggest that PrgA can interact with another enterococcal adhesin, PrgB, and that these two proteins have co-evolved. PrgB is a strong virulence factor, and PrgA is involved in post-translational processing of PrgB. Finally, competition mating experiments show that PrgA provides a significant fitness advantage to plasmid-carrying cells.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
César Gago-Córdoba ◽  
Jorge Val-Calvo ◽  
Andrés Miguel-Arribas ◽  
Ester Serrano ◽  
Praveen K. Singh ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 183 (4) ◽  
pp. 1124-1132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bianca Hochhut ◽  
John W. Beaber ◽  
Roger Woodgate ◽  
Matthew K. Waldor

ABSTRACT The SXT element, a conjugative, self-transmissible, integrating element (a constin) originally derived from a Vibrio cholerae O139 isolate from India, and IncJ element R391, originally derived from a South African Providencia rettgeri isolate, were found to be genetically and functionally related. Both of these constins integrate site specifically into the Escherichia coli chromosome at an identical attachment site within the 5′ end of prfC. They encode nearly identical integrases, which are required for chromosomal integration, excision, and extrachromosomal circularization of these elements, and they have similar tra genes. Therefore, these closely related constins have virtually identical mechanisms for chromosomal integration and dissemination. The presence of either element in a recipient cell did not significantly reduce its ability to acquire the other element, indicating that R391 and SXT do not encode surface exclusion determinants. In cells harboring both elements, SXT and R391 were integrated in tandem fashion on the chromosome, and homologous recombination appeared to play little or no role in the formation of these arrays. Interference between R391 and SXT was detected by measuring the frequency of loss of an unselected resident element upon introduction of a second selected element. In these assays, R391 was found to have a stronger effect on SXT stability than vice versa. The level of expression and/or activity of the donor and recipient integrases may play a role in the interference between these two related constins.


1998 ◽  
Vol 180 (16) ◽  
pp. 4036-4043 ◽  
Author(s):  
William A. Klimke ◽  
Laura S. Frost

ABSTRACT Mating pair stabilization occurs during conjugative DNA transfer whereby the donor and recipient cells form a tight junction which requires pili as well as TraN and TraG in the donor cell. The role of the outer membrane protein, TraN, during conjugative transfer was examined by introduction of a chloramphenicol resistance cassette into the traN gene on an F plasmid derivative, pOX38, to produce pOX38N1::CAT. pOX38N1::CAT was greatly reduced in its ability to transfer DNA, indicating that TraN plays a greater role in conjugation than previously thought. F and R100-1 traN were capable of complementing pOX38N1::CAT transfer equally well when wild-type recipients were used. FtraN, but not R100-1 traN, supported a much lower level of transfer when there was an ompA mutation or lipopolysaccharide (LPS) deficiency in the recipient cell, suggesting receptor specificity. The R100-1traN gene was sequenced, and the gene product was found to exhibit 82.3% overall similarity with F TraN. The differences were mainly located within a central region of the proteins (amino acids 162 to 333 of F and 162 to 348 of R100-1). Deletion analysis of FtraN suggested that this central portion might be responsible for the receptor specificity displayed by TraN. TraN was not responsible for TraT-dependent surface exclusion. Thus, TraN, and not the F pilus, appears to interact with OmpA and LPS moieties during conjugation, resulting in mating pair stabilization, the first step in efficient mobilization of DNA.


1995 ◽  
Vol 120 (4) ◽  
pp. 1034-1035
Author(s):  
K. S. Krivskaya ◽  
V. P. Shchipkov ◽  
A. P. Pekhov

Plasmid ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 254-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dena Lyras ◽  
Ariel W.S. Chan ◽  
Justin McFarlane ◽  
Vilma A. Stanisich

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document