Differential intertectal delay between Rana pipiens and Xenopus laevis: Implications for species-specific visual plasticity

In the frog Xenopus laevis, the isthmotectal projection, which relays input from the ipsilateral eye, exhibits anatomical reorganization following surgical eye rotation performed during tadpole stages while the isthmotectal projection in the frog Rana pipiens fails to show reorganization. This plasticity has been shown to be dependent upon activation of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor located on tectal cell dendrites. The reorganization process in Xenopus is hypothesized to employ a Hebbian mechanism requiring correlated firing of ipsilateral and contralateral inputs to a given tectal cell; when an ipsilateral axon synapses onto a tectal cell that receives input from a contralateral axon with a matching receptive-field location, the correlation in activity triggers stabilization of the ipsilateral synapse. However, in neither Xenopus nor Rana do ipsilateral and contralateral inputs begin to fire simultaneously in response to a given visual stimulus; the ipsilateral input is delayed because it reaches the tectum indirectly, through a polysynaptic relay via the opposite tectum and nucleus isthmi. The objective of this experiment was to test whether there is a significant difference in this intertectal delay between Xenopus laevis and Rana pipiens in order to determine whether intertectal delay could be a contributing factor in this species-specific ability to exhibit visual plasticity. We have found that intertectal delay is 26.16 ms longer in Rana pipiens (36.53 ms) than in Xenopus laevis (10.37 ms).

Chronic effects of NMDA and APV on tectal output in Xenopus laevis

In the South African clawed-toed frog Xenopus laevis, visual experience plays a crucial role in the formation of matching binocular maps in the tectum. The ipsilateral eye's projection, relayed through the crossed isthmotectal projection, displays marked plasticity in response to altered visual input during a critical period of development. This plasticity and the events responsible for the end of the critical period are mediated by N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor function. We have previously reported that chronic blockade of tectal NMDA receptors with the NMDA antagonist 5-amino-phosphonovaleric acid (APV) prevents plasticity of the crossed isthmotectal projection during the critical period, while chronic treatment with NMDA restores this plasticity after the end of the critical period. These results raise the question of whether the effects on plasticity are due to changes in electrical responsiveness of the treated tissue. In this study, we have quantitatively assessed the actions of APV and NMDA on certain aspects of tectal cell activity in Xenopus during and after the critical period by recording the output of the nucleus isthmi cells that are activated by the tectum after three weeks of treatment. We have found that chronic APV treatment does not alter tectal output, as indicated by the firing of isthmotectal axons, during the critical period and that chronic NMDA treatment increases tectal output in postcritical period Xenopus. Tectal output does not differ between normal Xenopus during and after the end of the critical period.These results indicate that the effect of APV on blocking isthmotectal plasticity is not due to a nonspecific inhibition of the segment of the retinotectal relay that activates the nucleus isthmi. The enhancement of tectal output in postcritical period Xenopus by chronic NMDA treatment may promote the effectiveness of NMDA in restoring isthmotectal plasticity after the end of the critical period, but the finding that tectal activity does not differ between normal Xenopus during and after the critical period implies that a reduction in tectal activity in not the cause of the loss of plasticity at the end of the critical period.

Recognition of position-specific properties of tectal cell membranes by retinal axons in vitro

In order to test the preference of growing axons for membrane-associated positional specificity a new in vitro assay was developed. In this assay, membrane fragments of two different sources are arranged as a carpet of very narrow alternating strips. Axons growing on such striped carpets are simultaneously confronted with the two substrates at the stripe borders. If there is a preference of axons for one or the other substrate they become oriented by the stripes and grow within the lanes of the preferred substrate. Such preferential growth could, in principle, be due to affinity to attractive factors on the preferred stripes or avoidance of repulsive factors on the alternate stripes. This assay system was used to investigate growth of chick retinal axons on tectal membranes. Tissue strips cut from various areas of the retina were explanted and the extending axons were confronted with stripes of cell membranes from various areas within the optic tectum. Tectal cell membranes prove to be an excellent substrate for the growth of retinal axons. Nasal and temporal axons can grow well on membranes of both posterior and anterior tectal cells. If, however, temporal axons are given a choice and encounter the border between anterior and posterior membranes they show a marked preference for growth on membranes of the anterior tectum, their natural target area. Nasal axons do not show a preference in this assay system. The transition from nasal to temporal properties within the retina is abrupt. In contrast, the transition from anterior to posterior properties of the tectal cell membranes occurs as a smooth gradient. Significantly, the positional differences of tectal membrane properties are only seen during the period of development of the retinotectal projection and are independent of tectal innervation by retinal axons. These anterior-posterior differences disappear by embryonic day 14.