A Simple Surgical Technique for Pediatric Sinus Pericranii: Intraoperative Manual Compression of a Major Shunting Point

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Sinus pericranii is a vascular anomaly with extra- and intracranial venous connections. Sinus pericranii is categorized into 2 groups according to its contribution to the normal venous circulation. The accessory type sinus pericranii, which does not contribute to the normal major venous circulation, can be managed. Despite several proposed operative maneuvers, a standardized technique is yet to be established to control intraoperative bleeding. <b><i>Case Presentation:</i></b> A 2-week-old neonate underwent examination of a subcutaneous mass in the parieto-occipital region. The subcutaneous mass had a major venous connection to the superior sagittal sinus on ultrasonography. The subcutaneous mass was partially thrombolized on magnetic resonance imaging and was minimally enhanced on computed tomography venography. The subcutaneous mass seemed not to contribute to the normal venous circulation. Surgical removal of the subcutaneous mass was performed due to its increased size at the age of 1 year and 3 months. While subcutaneous mass was detached from the scalp, the major venous connection was manually compressed, and minor venous connections were easily detected. The intraoperative bleeding was controllable. The pathological diagnosis was sinus pericranii. The patient is now followed up in the outpatient clinic. No recurrence was seen 18 months after the surgery. <b><i>Discussion/Conclusion:</i></b> Intraoperative hemostasis is essential while sinus pericranii is detached from the cranium. Hemostatic agents such as bone wax or absorbable gelatin and heat coagulation seem to be useful. However, complicative hemorrhage concerning to the preceded technique has been also reported. As seen in our case, to detect minor shunting points between the sinus pericranii and the intracranial veins, the major venous connection was manually compressed. Intraoperative manual compression of a major venous connection of sinus pericranii can be an option to manage intraoperative bleeding.

Computed tomography venography versus intravascular ultrasound in the diagnosis of iliofemoral vein stenosis

Summary: Background: Iliofemoral vein stenosis can cause debilitating chronic venous disease. Diagnostic tools include both computed tomography venography (CTV) and intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS). We aim to compare the diagnostic performance of CTV and IVUS. Patients and methods: We performed a retrospective study of patients with chronic venous disease presenting with iliac vein compression or post-thrombotic limb symptoms, excluding those with acute deep vein thrombosis, high anaesthesia risk, or who had contrast allergy. All patients received CTV before IVUS, as part of the diagnostic work-up and intervention. The cross-sectional area (CSA) of iliofemoral vein segments obtained from both studies were compared against reference CSAs to derive percentage stenosis. A 50% reduction in CSA was considered significant. Results: We studied 50 patients between May 2018 and April 2019. 58% of patients had severe disease CEAP C5-6. 48% of patients had at least one vein segment with significant stenosis. The left proximal common iliac vein was the most commonly stenosed vein segment (n = 12, 24% on IVUS). CSA measurements from CTV were greater than those of IVUS, with a correlation coefficient of 0.57 (p < 0.005). Conversely, percentage stenosis measured on CTV was lower than on IVUS, with approximately one-third of significant stenosis missed on CTV (58 veins from CTV vs. 78 from IVUS, p < 0.005). With IVUS as the gold standard, CTV has low sensitivity (37.2%, 95% CI 26.5–48.9) and high specificity (92.5%, 95% CI 89.3–94.9) in detecting significant stenosis. Conclusions: CTV has limited diagnostic performance in identifying iliofemoral vein stenosis. Patients with normal CTV findings should proceed with IVUS imaging if the clinical features are supportive of iliofemoral vein stenosis.

Multidetector spiral computed tomography–venography in outpatient phlebological practice

Duplex ultrasound scanning (DUS) and magnetic resonance imaging are sometimes insufficient to meet our clinical needs due to specifics of given pathology and intrinsic technical limitations of these methods. This study aims to assess the need for multispiral computed tomography–venography (CT-venography) and to evaluate its diagnostic capabilities for various disorders in primary ambulatory patients in phlebology practice.Material and Methods. From January, 2017 to December,2019, a total of 10,112 patients sought initial consultation of a phlebologist. Upon examination, the physician assigned patients to one of the proposed categories using dedicated software. Analysis of these categories demonstrated the following pattern of morbidity: 2,167 patients (21.4%) had chronic venous disorders of class С0S-1 (CEAP classification); 4,460 patients (44.1%) had varicose veins of class C2-3 (CEAP classification); 351 patients (3.5%) had varicose veins of class C4-6; 570 patients (5.6%) had other diseases including post-thrombotic syndrome, acute thrombosis, thrombophlebitis, and venous malformations; and 2,564 patients (25.4%) were suffering from non-venous disorders. DUS was performed in all cases.Results. The study demonstrated that 260 patients required CT-venography constituting 2.6% of the total number of patients who came to the clinic in the indicated period. The direct venography with contrast medium injection through the peripheral veins was used in 156 cases (60%). Patients did not have any significant complications, such as acute kidney injury or worsening of chronic renal failure, severe allergic reactions to the contrast agent, or problems with the puncture site of peripheral veins.Conclusions: 1) CT-venography allowed to achieve the accurate three-dimensional imaging of the venous system, providing, in some cases, the necessary information for finding solutions on optimal management. 2) The need for CT-venography may occur in 2.6% of patients in ambulatory phlebology practice. 3) CT-venography is useful for diagnosing angiodysplasias, postthrombotic and non-thrombotic lesions, complicated varicose veins, especially in recurrence, and in some cases of acute deep vein thrombosis. 4) DUS is mandatory for hemodynamic assessment in all patients before CT-venography.