Manual Compression Versus MANTA Device for Access Management After Impella Removal on the ICU

Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of manual compression versus use of the MANTA® closure device for access management after Impella® removal on the intensive care unit (ICU).Background: The number of patients treated with percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (pLVAD), namely Impella® and ECMO, for complex cardiac procedures or shock, is growing. However, removal of pLVAD and large bore arteriotomy closure among such patients on the ICU remains challenging, since it is associated with a high risk for bleeding and vascular complications. Methods: Patients included in a prospective registry between 2017 and 2020 were analyzed. Bleeding and vascular access site complications were assessed and adjudicated according to VARC-2 criteria. Results: We analyzed a cohort of 87 consecutive patients, who underwent access closure after Impella® removal on ICU by using either the MANTA® device or manual compression. The cohort´s mean age was 66.1±10.7 years and 76 patients (87%) were recovering from CS. Mean support time was 40 hours (Interquartile range 24–69 hours). MANTA® was used in 31 patients (35.6%) and manual compression was applied in 56 patients (64.4%). Overall access related bleedings were significantly lower in the MANTA® group (6.5% versus 39.3%(odds ratio (OR) 0.10, 95% CI 0.01–0.50; p=0.001), and there was no significant difference in vascular complications between the two groups(p=0.55).Conclusions: Our data suggests that the application of the MANTA® device directly on the ICU is safe. In addition, it seems to reduce access related bleeding without increasing the risk of vascular complications.

To Explore the Haemostatic Effect of Compression Haemostasis Using an Ultrasonic Probe under the Guidance of Ultrasound after Radial Artery Puncture

Objective. To evaluate a new haemostasis method using an ultrasound probe to compress the radial artery and haemostasis under direct vision to replace traditional manual compression of the radial artery. Methods. According to a random number table, 240 patients with gastrointestinal tumours who had undergone arterial puncture were divided into Group A (120 cases) and Group B (120 cases). In Group A, patients were under the guidance of ultrasound to confirm the vascular port, determine the compression position of the ultrasound probe, observe the degree of vascular deformation, and press the radial artery puncture port with pressure to stop bleeding under direct vision. In Group B, traditional manual compression was used. All patients received 5 min of compression for haemostasis, and haemostasis conditions were recorded after compression and 24 hours postoperatively. Results. The incidence of bleeding, haematoma, and skin ecchymosis at the puncture site after 5 minutes of compression in Group A was lower than that in Group B ( P < 0.05 ). No significant difference was found between the two groups at 24 hours after the operation ( P > 0.05 ). Conclusion. The method using an ultrasound probe to guide radial artery compression to haemostasis is better than traditional manual compression when applied for compression haemostasis after removing the radial artery catheter.

Hemorrhagic complications after endovascular interventions and the effectiveness of vascular closure devices

Aim. To identify the factors associated with hemorrhagic complications after endovascular interventions, as well as to assess the effectiveness of vascular closure devices.Material and methods. The study included 423 patients after endo - vascular intervention with femoral arterial access: 118 — manual compression, 305 — hemostasis using vascular closure devices (VCDs). The development of following complications was recorded: retroperitoneal hematoma, false aneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, bleeding, thigh soft-tissue hematoma. Time to hemostasis, immobilization period, and length of stay were assessed.Results. The complication rate was lower in VCD group compared to manual hemostasis (2,95 vs 11%, p=0,021). In VCD group, hemostasis characteristics significantly differed from the manual compression group: time to hemostasis — 3,1 vs 22,3 min (p=0,001), immobilization duration — 4,1 vs 20 hours (p=0,001), length of stay — 4 vs 8 days (p=0,001), respectively. The risk of complications increased with following factors: anticoagulant therapy, female sex, age >65 years, diabetes, body mass index >30 kg/m2 , vascular access calcification, introducer diameter >6 Fr, prior puncture. There were following independent predictors of complications: glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy, superficial or deep femoral artery puncture.Conclusion. VCDs significantly reduces the hemorrhagic complication rate and improves hemostasis parameters as compared to manual compression.

Is Instrumental Compression Equally Effective and Comfortable for Physiotherapists and Physiotherapy Students than Manual Compression? A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study

The objective of this work is to compare the homogeneity of instrumental and manual compression during the simulation of a pressure release technique, measured with a dynamometer, as well as to evaluate the comparative degree of comfort by physiotherapists and physiotherapy students when performing this technique. Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study was carried out with physiotherapists (lecturers with clinical experience) and 4th year students of the Physiotherapy Degree at Universidad San Jorge. The amount of pressure performed and how it was maintained during 80 s with both techniques was analysed using a digital dynamometer. The degree of comfort was evaluated using a modified numeric rating scale, with higher values representing a higher degree of discomfort. Results: A total of 30 subjects participated. Significant differences were found between the techniques in terms of maintaining a constant pressure level for 80 s (p = 0.043). A statistically significant difference was found between both techniques in the period from 45 to 80 s. Regarding the degree of discomfort, the value obtained from the students’ responses was 4.67 (1.35) for the manual technique and 1.93 (0.88) for the instrumental technique. In the case of physiotherapists, the comfort was 4.87 (2.13) for the manual technique and 3.33 (1.54) for the instrumental technique. Conclusion: The sustained manual compression necessary in manual pressure release techniques in the treatment of myofascial trigger points can be performed with assistive tools that guarantee a uniform compression maintained throughout the development of the technique and are more comfortable for physiotherapists.

Access Site Related Vascular Complications following Percutaneous Cardiovascular Procedures

Vascular access site complications (ASC) are among the most frequent complications of percutaneous cardiovascular procedures (PCP) and are associated with adverse outcome and high resources utilization. In this prospective study, we investigated patients with postprocedural clinical suspicion of ASC evaluated by duplex ultrasound (DUS) for the presence of ASC. We assessed the incidence, in-hospital outcome, treatment of complications and predictors for ASC. Overall, 12,901 patients underwent PCP during a 40 months period. Of those, 2890 (22.4%) patients had postprocedural clinical symptoms of ASC and were evaluated using DUS. An ASC was found in 206 of the DUS examined patients (corresponding to 7.1% of the 2890 DUS examined patients). In 6.7% of all valvular/TAVI procedures, an ASC was documented, while coronary, electrophysiological and peripheral PCP had a comparable and low rate of complications (1.2–1.5%). Pseudoaneurysm (PSA) was the most frequent ASC (67.5%), followed by arteriovenous fistula (13.1%), hematoma (7.8%) and others (11.7%). Of all PSA, 84 (60.4%) were treated surgically, 44 (31.6%) by manual compression and 11 (7.9%) conservatively. Three (0.02%) patients died due to hemorrhagic shock. In conclusion, femoral ASC are rare in the current era of PCP with PSA being the leading type of ASC. Nonetheless, patients with predisposing risk factors and postprocedural suspicious clinical findings should undergo a DUS to early detect and mitigate ASC-associated outcome.

Direct carotid artery access for neurointerventional procedures in infants

BackgroundFemoral access is the primary route for neurointerventional procedures in children. However, endovascular treatment may not always be possible through a femoral approach, necessitating conversion to alternative access routes.ObjectiveTo review the feasibility and safety of direct carotid puncture (DCP) in infants undergoing neuroendovascular interventions.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of all infants who underwent DCP as the access route to treat neuroendovascular pathologies between January 2011 and January 2021. Patients’ demographics, clinical presentation, imaging findings, and technical details were reviewed.ResultsBetween January 2011 and January 2021, five infants aged between 28 and 150 days underwent DCP out of 1129 neuroendovascular interventions performed in our institution (0.4%). All five infants (100%) were diagnosed with intracranial fistulas and were found to have severe tortuosity of the cervical arteries. DCP was performed as the initial access route in 2/5 patients and as crossover after a failed femoral attempt in 3/5 patients. DCP was performed under ultrasound guidance in all patients. Closure was performed by manual compression, without complications. Ultrasound showed patent cervical vessels in all patients at 3 months’ follow-up.ConclusionDirect carotid access is a feasible and safe alternative route to treat neuroendovascular pathologies in infants and can be considered in cases of inaccessible or failed transfemoral access or in cases with severe arterial tortuosity in infants with intracranial fistulas.