Exploring the experience of boarded psychiatric patients in adult emergency departments

Background This study quantifies the frequency of adverse events (AEs) experienced by psychiatric patients while boarded in the emergency department (ED) and describes those events over a broad range of categories. Methods A retrospective chart review (RCR) of adult psychiatric patients aged 18–55 presenting to one of four Calgary EDs (Foothills Medical Centre (FMC), the Peter Lougheed Centre (PLC), the Rockyview General Hospital (RGH), and South Health Campus (SHC)) who were subsequently admitted to an inpatient psychiatric unit between January 1, 2019 and May 15, 2019 were eligible for review. A test of association was used to determine the odds of an independent variable being associated with an adverse event. Results During the study time period, 1862 adult patients were admitted from EDs (city wide) to the psychiatry service. Of the 200 charts reviewed, the average boarding time was 23.5 h with an average total ED length of stay of 31 h for all presentations within the sample. Those who experienced an AE while boarded in the ED had a significantly prolonged average boarding time (35 h) compared to those who did not experience one (6.5 h) (p = 0.005). Conclusions The length of time a patient is in the emergency department and the length of time a patient is boarded after admission significantly increases the odds that the patient will experience an AE while in the ED. Other significant factors associated with AEs include the type of admission and the hospital the patient was admitted from.

The CAMP study: feasibility and clinical correlates of standardized assessments of substance use in a youth psychiatric inpatient sample

Background To determine: (a) the feasibility and acceptability of administering a standardized electronic assessment of substance use and other mental health concerns to youth admitted to an inpatient psychiatric unit, and (b) the prevalence and clinical correlates of substance use in this sample. Methods The sample included 100 youth between the ages of 13 to 17 years admitted to an inpatient psychiatric unit in Ontario, Canada between September and November 2019 (78% response rate). Youth data were comprised of electronic self-reported assessments (during hospitalization and 6-months following) and chart reviews (99% consented; historical and prospective). Frontline staff completed a self-report survey assessing their perceptions of the need for standardized substance use assessments, training, and interventions on the unit (n = 38 Registered Nurses and Child and Youth Workers; 86% response rate). Analyses included descriptive statistics, correlations, regression, and qualitative content analysis. Results Feasibility of standardized youth self-reported mental health and substance use assessments was evident by high response rates, little missing data, and variability in responses. 79% of youth had used at least one substance in their lifetime; 69% reported use in the last 3 months. Substance use was positively correlated with severity of psychiatric symptoms (τb 0.17 to 0.45) and number of psychiatric diagnoses (τb 0.17 to 0.54) at index. Based on prospective and retrospective data, substance use was also positively related to mental health symptom severity at follow-up and repeat mental health related hospital visits. Frontline staff reported a need for standardized assessment, training, and interventions on the unit, indicative of acceptability. Conclusions This study demonstrated the feasibility, acceptability and clinical importance of administering a standardized mental health and substance use assessment among youth experiencing psychiatric hospitalization.

Evaluation of Primary Prescription Nonadherence Post-discharge from an Inpatient Psychiatry Unit at a Large Urban Community Hospital –an Observational Study

Introduction: Here, we aimed to evaluate primary prescription nonadherence post-discharge from an acute inpatient psychiatric unit. Prescription nonadherence is a concern across all patient care settings, with primary nonadherence defined as not picking up prescribed medication from the pharmacy or not delivering prescriptions to the pharmacy. Secondary nonadherence, defined as filling a prescription but not taking the medication as prescribed, was not tracked in this study. The incidence of nonadherence can vary widely across settings and has been reported to range from 3 to 86%. This is a particular concern in patients with a primary psychiatric diagnosis both in an outpatient and inpatient setting. Design: The prescription fill rate of eligible patients was tracked on days 7 and 21 post-discharge from acute inpatient psychiatric units of an acute care multispecialty urban community teaching hospital. Results: In total, 72 patients aged 18 and above (44%, women) were analyzed. A primary nonadherence incidence of 43% was found, which did not vary significantly across the analyzed variables of age, sex, or primary diagnosis. Conclusion: Primary nonadherence is a significant issue in this population. Strategies, such as the implementation of med-to-bed programs and use of longer acting injectables when appropriate, would help in increasing adherence. Further research, including the evaluation of other variables that affect nonadherence, is needed in order to identify and develop steps to overcome the obstacles to adherence.