Nurse managers in mental health units: from activities to time management

Objective: to understand the use of time by nurse managers in psychiatry and mental health units, as they carry out their daily tasks. Methods: cross-sectional study, carried out by 48 managers from public psychiatric units and from the social sector. Data collection was made through an online questionnaire that is part of the Scale of Perception of Nurse Manager Work, including 43 items separated in five functional domains of nurse managers. The responses were in a Likert scale: does not take time, takes little time, takes some time, takes much time. Results: the activities inherent to ethical and legal professional practices and to the management of care and of human resources required more time from the manager when compared to policy interventions, and consulting and professional development. Conclusion: the managers recognize that managing time implies organization, planning work, and establishing priorities in the tasks to be developed.

Addressing Dual Disorders in a Medium-Term Admission Unit

Due to the significant functional repercussions suffered by patients with dual disorder, we must evaluate which ones can benefit from intensive rehabilitative therapies in medium-stay psychiatric units. This was a retrospective study of patient medical records which intended to analyze sociodemographic and clinical variables and parameters related to the hospitalization and discharge of patients admitted to the Medium-Stay Unit (MSU) at the Castellón Provincial Hospital Consortium over 2 years (2017 and 2018), according to the presence or absence of dual disorders in these patients. Patients with a dual disorder represented 55.2% of the hospitalized patients. A higher proportion of them were male, were relatively younger, and had an earlier onset of mental illness, fewer associated medical pathologies, and shorter hospital admission times to the Short-Term Hospitalization Unit than those who did not present a dual disorder. A diagnosis on the schizophrenia spectrum with cannabis use or polyconsumption was the most common diagnosis; 98.2% of all the patients responded adequately to admission to the MSU. This work highlighted the need for higher doses of depot paliperidone in patients with dual disorders.

Measuring Seclusion in Psychiatric Intensive Care: Development and Measurement Properties of the Clinical Seclusion Checklist

Background: Acute psychiatric units in general hospitals must ensure that acutely disturbed patients do not harm themselves or others, and simultaneously provide care and treatment and help patients regain control of their behavior. This led to the development of strategies for the seclusion of a patient in this state within a particular area separated from other patients in the ward. While versions of this practice have been used in different countries and settings, a systematic framework for describing the various parameters and types of seclusion interventions has not been available. The aims of the project were to develop and test a valid and reliable checklist for characterizing seclusion in inpatient psychiatric care.Methods: Development and testing of the checklist were accomplished in five stages. Staff in psychiatric units completed detailed descriptions of seclusion episodes. Elements of seclusion were identified by thematic analysis of this material, and consensus regarding these elements was achieved through a Delphi process comprising two rounds. Good content validity was ensured through the sample of seclusion episodes and the representative participants in the Delphi process. The first draft of the checklist was revised based on testing by clinicians assessing seclusion episodes. The revised checklist with six reasons for and 10 elements of seclusion was tested with different response scales, and acceptable interrater reliability was achieved.Results: The Clinical Seclusion Checklist is a brief and feasible tool measuring six reasons for seclusion, 10 elements of seclusion, and four contextual factors. It was developed through a transparent process and exhibited good content validity and acceptable interrater reliability.Conclusion: The checklist is a step toward achieving valid and clinically relevant measurements of seclusion. Its use in psychiatric units may contribute to quality assurance, more reliable statistics and comparisons across sites and periods, improved research on patients' experiences of seclusion and its effects, reduction of negative consequences of seclusion, and improvement of psychiatric intensive care.

Inter- and Intrastate Variation of Mental Health Requirements for Assisted Living in Seven States

Little is known about states’ approaches to regulating mental health (MH) services in assisted living (AL) settings. Yet, one in nine AL residents are diagnosed with serious mental illness (Hua et al, 2020). This study describes the MH regulatory requirements in AL regulations within Arkansas, Louisiana, New Jersey, New York, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, and Texas. Using health services regulatory analysis (Smith et al, 2021), we reviewed 2018 regulations for the 45 identified AL licenses within these states sourced from Nexis Uni. We summarize 16 MH requirements related to admission, care transitions, resident assessment, third-party services access, and staff training. Each state explicitly addressed at least one of the identified MH requirements, though few states have consistency across all AL types within a state. The most commonly addressed requirements related to admission limitations, assessment, and transfer to psychiatric units. Understanding these requirements promotes a holistic approach to practices that meet residents' needs.

iPSYcare: the development of a linked electronic medical records database to study and optimize psychiatric care in Antwerp

Objective The study of care trajectories of psychiatric patients across hospitals was previously not possible in Belgium as each hospital stores its data autonomously, and government-related registrations do not contain a unique identifier or are incomplete. A new longitudinal database called iPSYcare (Improved Psychiatric Care and Research) was therefore constructed in 2021, and links the electronic medical records of patients in psychiatric units of eight hospitals in the Antwerp Province, Belgium. The database provides a wide range of information on patients, care trajectories and delivered care in the region. In a first phase, the database will only contain information about adult patients who were admitted to a hospital or treated by an outreach team and who gave explicit consent. In the future, the database may be expanded to other regions and additional data on outpatient care may be added. Results IPSYcare is a close collaboration between the University of Antwerp and hospitals in the province of Antwerp. This paper describes the development of the database, how privacy and ethical issues will be handled, and how the governance of the database will be organized.

Evaluation of Primary Prescription Nonadherence Post-discharge from an Inpatient Psychiatry Unit at a Large Urban Community Hospital –an Observational Study

Introduction: Here, we aimed to evaluate primary prescription nonadherence post-discharge from an acute inpatient psychiatric unit. Prescription nonadherence is a concern across all patient care settings, with primary nonadherence defined as not picking up prescribed medication from the pharmacy or not delivering prescriptions to the pharmacy. Secondary nonadherence, defined as filling a prescription but not taking the medication as prescribed, was not tracked in this study. The incidence of nonadherence can vary widely across settings and has been reported to range from 3 to 86%. This is a particular concern in patients with a primary psychiatric diagnosis both in an outpatient and inpatient setting. Design: The prescription fill rate of eligible patients was tracked on days 7 and 21 post-discharge from acute inpatient psychiatric units of an acute care multispecialty urban community teaching hospital. Results: In total, 72 patients aged 18 and above (44%, women) were analyzed. A primary nonadherence incidence of 43% was found, which did not vary significantly across the analyzed variables of age, sex, or primary diagnosis. Conclusion: Primary nonadherence is a significant issue in this population. Strategies, such as the implementation of med-to-bed programs and use of longer acting injectables when appropriate, would help in increasing adherence. Further research, including the evaluation of other variables that affect nonadherence, is needed in order to identify and develop steps to overcome the obstacles to adherence.