Holocentric Chromosomes Probably Do Not Prevent Centromere Drive in Cyperaceae

Centromere drive model describes an evolutionary process initiated by centromeric repeats expansion, which leads to the recruitment of excess kinetochore proteins and consequent preferential segregation of an expanded centromere to the egg during female asymmetric meiosis. In response to these selfish centromeres, the histone protein CenH3, which recruits kinetochore components, adaptively evolves to restore chromosomal parity and counter the detrimental effects of centromere drive. Holocentric chromosomes, whose kinetochores are assembled along entire chromosomes, have been hypothesized to prevent expanded centromeres from acquiring a selective advantage and initiating centromere drive. In such a case, CenH3 would be subjected to less frequent or no adaptive evolution. Using codon substitution models, we analyzed 36 CenH3 sequences from 35 species of the holocentric family Cyperaceae. We found 10 positively selected codons in the CenH3 gene [six codons in the N-terminus and four in the histone fold domain (HFD)] and six branches of its phylogeny along which the positive selection occurred. One of the positively selected codons was found in the centromere targeting domain (CATD) that directly interacts with DNA and its mutations may be important in centromere drive suppression. The frequency of these positive selection events was comparable to the frequency of positive selection in monocentric clades with asymmetric female meiosis. Taken together, these results suggest that preventing centromere drive is not the primary adaptive role of holocentric chromosomes, and their ability to suppress it likely depends on their kinetochore structure in meiosis.

The centromere histone is conserved and associated with tandem repeats sharing a conserved 19 bp box in the holocentromere of Meloidogyne nematodes

Although centromeres have conserved function, centromere-specific histone H3 (CenH3) and centromeric DNA evolve rapidly. The centromere drive model explains this phenomenon as a consequence of the conflict between fast evolving DNA and CenH3, suggesting asymmetry in female meiosis as a crucial factor. We characterized evolution of the CenH3 protein in three closely related, polyploid mitotic parthenogenetic species of the Meloidogyne incognita group (MIG), and in the distantly related meiotic parthenogen Meloidogyne hapla. We identified duplication of the CenH3 gene in a putative sexual ancestral Meloidogyne. We found that one CenH3 (αCenH3) copy remained conserved in all extant species, including in distant Meloidogyne hapla, while the other copy evolved rapidly and under positive selection into four different CenH3 variants. This pattern of CenH3 evolution in Meloidogyne species suggests the sub-specialization of CenH3s in ancestral sexual species. Immunofluorescence performed on mitotic Meloidogyne incognita revealed a dominant role of αCenH3 on its centromere, while the other CenH3s have lost their function in mitosis. The observed αCenH3 chromosome distribution disclosed cluster-like centromeric organization. The ChIP-Seq analysis revealed that in M. incognita αCenH3-associated DNA dominantly comprises tandem repeats, composed of divergent monomers which share a completely conserved 19 bp-long box. Conserved αCenH3-associated DNA are also confirmed in the related mitotic MIG species suggesting preservation of both centromere protein and DNA constituents. We hypothesize that the absence of centromere drive in mitosis might allow for CenH3 and its associated DNA to achieve an equilibrium in which they can persist for long periods of time.

Centromere drive and suppression by parallel pathways for recruiting microtubule destabilizers

SummarySelfish centromere DNA sequences bias their transmission to the egg in female meiosis. Evolutionary theory suggests that centromere proteins evolve to suppress costs of this “centromere drive”. In hybrid mouse models with genetically different maternal and paternal centromeres, selfish centromere DNA exploits a kinetochore pathway to recruit microtubule-destabilizing proteins that act as drive effectors. We show that such functional differences are suppressed by a parallel pathway for effector recruitment by heterochromatin, which is similar between centromeres in this system. Disrupting heterochromatin by CENP-B deletion amplifies functional differences between centromeres, whereas disrupting the kinetochore pathway with a divergent allele of CENP-C reduces the differences. Molecular evolution analyses using newly sequenced Murinae genomes identify adaptive evolution in proteins in both pathways. We propose that centromere proteins have recurrently evolved to minimize the kinetochore pathway, which is exploited by selfish DNA, relative to the heterochromatin pathway that equalizes centromeres, while maintaining essential functions.

Centromeric Repeats of the Western European House Mouse II: Selection for High Local Diversity of Monomers and a Hypothesis for Coevolution between Centromere Size and Karyotype Number

The companion paper (Rice 2020) found that the centromeric repeats of the Western European house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus) have unusual structure: i) despite moderate pairwise sequence divergence (average = 5.9%), no monomer sequence was common and many hundreds of monomer sequences were observed, ii) local sequence divergence among neighboring monomers was nearly as high as genome-wide divergence, and iii) matching sequences were rare between side-by-side monomers. Here I integrate information from many published studies to formulate a hypothesis for the evolution of this structure. Non-matching sequences of neighboring centromeric monomers is hypothesized to be selectively favored in the context of molecular drive because it reduces the rate of monomer deletion during repair of double strand breaks (DSBs) via the Single Strand Annealing (SSA) pathway. The foundation for the hypothesis is the observation that centromeres of most populations of M. m. domestics reside close to the telomere, i.e., all their chromosomes are telocentrics. This proximity influences repair of centromeric DSBs because it places at least part of the centromere within the Telomere-Affected Repair Region (TARR; a location with increased concentrations of the shelterin-complex proteins that bind telomeres, especially TRF2). Shelterin proteins increase the level of 5’→3’ end resection at DSBs and thereby: i) decrease the frequency of repair via the c- NHEJ pathway, and ii) increase the frequency of homology-directed repair (HD-repair) –including the SSA repair pathway. It is hypothesized that certain ‘trigger’ events (e.g., sub-telomeric deletions) occur in local populations that increase the influence of TARR on the centromere. This increase elevates the occurrence of SSA repair of centromeric DSBs to a level that causes centromeres to begin to gradually shrink. Chronic shrinkage leads to coevolution between centromere size and karyotype number. Once centromeres shrink to a size below a critical minimum (that causes substantially reduced kinetochore size), fusions between non- homologous telocentrics with undersized centromeres produces metacentrics with an expanded centromere size (and a corresponding ‘quantum-jump’ in kinetochore size). These metacentrics: i) accumulate to fixation because they are favored by centromere drive, and ii) are released from the influence of TARR and thereby gradually recover larger centromere size. Fission of metacentrics with enlarged centromeres can next plausibly regenerate pairs of telocentrics with sufficiently large centromeres (which recruit normal-sized kinetochores) to be favored by centromere drive and accumulate to fixation. This fixation completes a cycle of coevolution within genomes that oscillate between two extremes: i) high karyotype number (2N = 40; all telocentrics) with larger centromeres, and ii) low karyotype number (2N << 40; mainly metacentrics) with initially small centromeres that gradually increase in size.

Molecular and evolutionary strategies of meiotic cheating by selfish centromeres

SummaryAsymmetric division in female meiosis creates selective pressure favoring selfish centromeres that bias their transmission to the egg. This centromere drive can explain the paradoxical rapid evolution of both centromere DNA and centromere-binding proteins despite conserved centromere function. Here, we define a molecular pathway linking expanded centromeres to histone phosphorylation and recrui™ent of microtubule destabilizing factors in an intraspecific hybrid, leading to detachment of selfish centromeres from spindle microtubules that would direct them to the polar body. We also introduce a second hybrid model, exploiting centromere divergence between species, and show that winning centromeres in one hybrid become losers in the other. Our results indicate that increasing destabilizing activity is a general strategy for drive, but centromeres have evolved distinct strategies to increase that activity. Furthermore, we show that drive depends on slowing meiotic progression, suggesting that a weakened meiotic spindle checkpoint evolved as a mechanism to suppress selfish centromeres.