indirect flight muscle
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

85
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

21
(FIVE YEARS 0)

BIO-PROTOCOL ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Szilárd Szikora ◽  
Tibor Novák ◽  
Tamás Gajdos ◽  
Miklós Erdélyi ◽  
József Mihály

2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Salam Herojeet Singh ◽  
Prabodh Kumar ◽  
Nallur B. Ramachandra ◽  
Upendra Nongthomba

2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (3) ◽  
pp. 404a
Author(s):  
Nadia Daneshparvar ◽  
Dianne Taylor ◽  
Hamidreza Rahmani ◽  
Kenneth A. Taylor

BIO-PROTOCOL ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kunal Chakraborty ◽  
K. VijayRaghavan ◽  
Rajesh D Gunage

2017 ◽  
Vol 313 (6) ◽  
pp. C621-C631 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernadette M. Glasheen ◽  
Catherine C. Eldred ◽  
Leah C. Sullivan ◽  
Cuiping Zhao ◽  
Michael K. Reedy ◽  
...  

Muscle stretch activation (SA) is critical for optimal cardiac and insect indirect flight muscle (IFM) power generation. The SA mechanism has been investigated for decades with many theories proposed, but none proven. One reason for the slow progress could be that multiple SA mechanisms may have evolved in multiple species or muscle types. Laboratories studying IFM SA in the same or different species have reported differing SA functional properties which would, if true, suggest divergent mechanisms. However, these conflicting results might be due to different experimental methodologies. Thus, we directly compared SA characteristics of IFMs from two SA model systems, Drosophila and Lethocerus, using two different fiber bathing solutions. Compared with Drosophila IFM, Lethocerus IFM isometric tension is 10- or 17-fold higher and SA tension was 5- or 10-fold higher, depending on the bathing solution. However, the rate of SA tension generation was 9-fold faster for Drosophila IFM. The inverse differences between rate and tension in the two species causes maximum power output to be similar, where Drosophila power is optimized in the bathing solution that favors faster muscle kinetics and Lethocerus in the solution that favors greater tension generation. We found that isometric tension and SA tension increased with calcium concentration for both species in both solutions, reaching a maximum plateau around pCa 5.0. Our results favor a similar mechanism for both species, perhaps involving a troponin complex that does not fully calcium activate the thin filament thus leaving room for further tension generation by SA.


2017 ◽  
Vol 312 (2) ◽  
pp. C111-C118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cuiping Zhao ◽  
Douglas M. Swank

Stretch activation (SA) is a delayed increase in force that enables high power and efficiency from a cyclically contracting muscle. SA exists in various degrees in almost all muscle types. In Drosophila, the indirect flight muscle (IFM) displays exceptionally high SA force production ( FSA), whereas the jump muscle produces only minimal FSA. We previously found that expressing an embryonic (EMB) myosin heavy chain (MHC) isoform in the jump muscle transforms it into a moderately SA muscle type and enables positive cyclical power generation. To investigate whether variation in MHC isoforms is sufficient to produce even higher FSA, we substituted the IFM MHC isoform (IFI) into the jump muscle. Surprisingly, we found that IFI only caused a 1.7-fold increase in FSA, less than half the increase previously observed with EMB, and only at a high Pi concentration, 16 mM. This IFI-induced FSA is much less than what occurs in IFM, relative to isometric tension, and did not enable positive cyclical power generation by the jump muscle. Both isometric tension and FSA of control fibers decreased with increasing Pi concentration. However, for IFI-expressing fibers, only isometric tension decreased. The rate of FSA generation was ~1.5-fold faster for IFI fibers than control fibers, and both rates were Pi dependent. We conclude that MHC isoforms can alter FSA and hence cyclical power generation but that isoforms can only endow a muscle type with moderate FSA. Highly SA muscle types, such as IFM, likely use a different or additional mechanism.


2016 ◽  
Vol 110 (3) ◽  
pp. 128a
Author(s):  
Manuela Lavorato ◽  
William Schmidt ◽  
Meera C. Viswanathan ◽  
Julien Ochala ◽  
Clara Franzini-Armstrong ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meera C. Viswanathan ◽  
Anna C. Blice-Baum ◽  
William Schmidt ◽  
D. Brian Foster ◽  
Anthony Cammarato

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document