genetic conformity
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

7
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

2
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A Kock

Abstract Plant breeders’ rights (PBR) within the framework of the International Convention for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV) are the sui generis intellectual property (IP) system of choice for plant varieties. It achieves a balance between the protection of new varieties and access to protected breeding material for further improvement. The extension of the protection to essentially derived varieties (EDVs) in the UPOV 1991 Convention1 was controversial from the beginning as it creates a tension with the breeders’ exemption. The 2017 UPOV Explanatory Notes on EDVs further fueled the debate as they were seen to limit the EDV extension, while some argue that the EDV scope should extend to all predominantly derived varieties merely on the basis of genetic conformity. With the rise of new breeding technologies (NBTs), legal certainty on the EDV definition is of fundamental importance to avoid a chilling effect on these promising technologies. Not only would a broad EDV definition block critical innovation and restrict the full potential of NBTs to a few multinational companies,2 it would also substantially limit the scope of protection of NBT-derived varieties, as an EDV itself is not entitled to the EDV extension: Valuable NBT-derived varieties would become easy prey for plagiarism. This article shows that the legislative intent of the EDV provision does not limit innovative breeding to conventional crossing and that there is no basis for extending EDV protection to new, innovative varieties which do not retain the essential characteristics of the initial variety (IV) even if there is a high genetic conformity. By analogy with the doctrine of equivalents under the patent system, a derived variety cannot qualify as an EDV if it (i) does not retain all the essential characteristic of the IV and (ii) is ‘non-obvious’ and causes a ‘significant technical progress of considerable economic interest’. The article finally suggests guidelines and processes to overcome the current EDV dilemma.


2020 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 325-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Solène Pruvot-Woehl ◽  
Sarada Krishnan ◽  
William Solano ◽  
Tim Schilling ◽  
Lucile Toniutti ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Locating the optimal varieties for coffee cultivation is increasingly considered a key condition for sustainable production and marketing. Variety performance varies when it comes to susceptibility to coffee leaf rust and other diseases, adaptation to climate change and high cup quality for specialty markets. But because of poor organization and the lack of a professional coffee seed sector, most existing coffee farms (and even seed lots and nurseries) do not know which varieties they are using. DNA fingerprinting of coffee planting material will contribute to professionalize the coffee seed sector. Objective The objective of this paper is i) to check in a large scale the robustness of the existing coffee DNA fingerprinting method based on eight Single Sequence Repeats markers (SRR) and ii) to describe how it can help in moving the needle towards a more professional seed sector. Method 2533 samples representing all possible genetic background of Arabica varieties were DNA fingerprinted with 8 SRR markers. The genetic diversity was analyzed and the genetic conformity to varietal references was assessed. Results The DNA fingerprinting method proved to be robust in authenticating varieties and trace back the history of C. arabica breeding and of the movement of C. arabica varieties. The genetic conformity of two important coffee varieties, Marseillesa and Gesha, proved to be 91% and 39% respectively. Conclusions DNA fingerprinting provides different actors in the coffee sector with a powerful new tool—farmers can verify the identity of their cultivated varieties, coffee roasters can be assured that marketing claims related to varieties are correct, and most of all, those looking to establish the a more professional and reliable coffee seed sector have a reliable new monitoring tool to establish and check genetic purity of seed stock and nursery plants. Highlights While C. arabica is primarily self-pollinating, even fixed line varieties appear to be drifting away from their original genetic reference due to uncontrolled cross pollination. A set of 8 SSR markers applied to the largest possible genetically diverse set of samples prove to discriminate between a wide range of varieties Figures confirm that genetic non conformity of coffee varieties can represent up to 61% of checked samples.


2019 ◽  
Vol 245 ◽  
pp. 144-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ameni Nasri ◽  
Emna Baklouti ◽  
Amal Ben Romdhane ◽  
Mohamed Maalej ◽  
Heinz Martin Schumacher ◽  
...  

Science ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 342 (6160) ◽  
pp. 778-779
Author(s):  
B. A. Purnell
Keyword(s):  

Somatechnics ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 334-356
Author(s):  
Janet Merewether

This article will examine the ethical and directorial challenges faced by the documentary filmmaker when collaborating with a central subject who lives with a potentially fatal genetic condition, whilst pursuing a career as a professional dominatrix. What modes of representation and collaboration are open to the director, when artificial boundaries and television genre categorisations such as ‘the science documentary’, ‘the biography’ and the fetish or ‘porno film’ seem limiting? Jabe Babe – A Heightened Life ( Merewether 2005 ) seeks to collapse and merge these conventionally distinct practices by developing a hybrid mode of representation, provoking questions about society's desire for sexual, visual, and genetic conformity.


2000 ◽  
pp. 99-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. De Riek ◽  
M. Mertens ◽  
J. Dendauw ◽  
E. Van Bockstaele ◽  
M. De Loose ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document