masticatory stress
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

13
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

7
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (7) ◽  
pp. 68-72
Author(s):  
Yuri Marcel Estevam Menezes ◽  
Allyssia Vitória Souza da Silva ◽  
Vivian Eduarda de Lemos Cordeiro ◽  
Ana Karina Fonseca de Carvalho Calderan Correa

The surgical removal of the buccal fat pad or Bichectomy is an aesthetic-functional procedure with aesthetic attributions associated with the face contour, smoothness and symmetry of facial lines, in addition to its therapeutic performance linked to the reduction of intraoral lesions caused by repetitive masticatory stress, as well as aid in the closure of spaces created by tumors, oral-sinus communication and others; this tissue also offers the possibility of being used as a graft for the treatment of intraoral pathologies and covering bone exposures in defective implants. The performance of this procedure is by intraoral access and its final result can be observed after approximately three months.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 429-436
Author(s):  
Angelo Luiz Freddo ◽  
Eliete Biasotto Hauser ◽  
Victor Velho de Castro ◽  
Pedro Yoshito Noritomi ◽  
Alexandre Simões de Almeida ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
NA Nomann ◽  
MAA Polan ◽  
CM Jan ◽  
F Rashid ◽  
A Taleb

Basically most of the dentists choose amalgam for posterior restorations and they think amalgam is safe and poses no health risk to the patient. They also think that amalgam is the best material for posterior restoration as it can bear more masticatory stress, low price, easy to manipulate and also easy to handle/ place into the cavity. Moreover, their perception regarding amalgam is also very positive such as it is durable, the percentage of cusp fracture is less, no shrinkage and it has no toxic/harmful effect for oral health and general health also. But now a days controversy arises about this type of thinking in many clinical researches. Furthermore, composite became very popular to the dentist because of esthetic, two types of bonding (mechanical & chemical), less sound tooth structure have to remove, no harmful effect like mercury of amalgam, marginal leakage is less, cusp fracture is less, secondary caries detection easier than amalgam by radiograph, composite takes good polish, etc. But composite resins also have some disadvantages. This article has been prepared to give a picture on merits, demerits and different aspects of comparison on amalgam and composite restorative materials after reviewing different articles and publications.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjdre.v3i1.16593 Bangladesh Journal of Dental Research & Education Vol.3(1) 2013: 30-35


PLoS ONE ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. e29121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley S. Hammond ◽  
Elizabeth R. Dumont ◽  
Robert C. McCarthy

2010 ◽  
Vol 145 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janine Chalk ◽  
Brian G. Richmond ◽  
Callum F. Ross ◽  
David S. Strait ◽  
Barth W. Wright ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 138 (3) ◽  
pp. 306-317 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Daegling ◽  
W. Scott McGraw
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Vol 210 (4) ◽  
pp. 628-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Ravosa ◽  
R. Kunwar ◽  
S. R. Stock ◽  
M. S. Stack

2000 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 667-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Ravosa ◽  
Vivian E. Noble ◽  
William L. Hylander ◽  
Kirk R. Johnson ◽  
Erica M. Kowalski

1992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaarlo Nygren ◽  
Raimo V. J. Silvennoinen ◽  
Markku Karna

1991 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
William L. Hylander ◽  
Kirk R. Johnson ◽  
Pascal G. Picq
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document