Ventriculolumbar perfusion and inhalational anesthesia with sevoflurane in an accidental intrathecal injection of tranexamic acid: unreported treatment options

BackgroundTranexamic acid (TXA) decreases hemorrhage-related mortality in trauma patients and is increasingly being used during obstetric and orthopedic surgeries. Inadvertent intrathecal injection of TXA is a rare, potentially lethal event leading to dose-dependent cardiotoxicity and neurotoxicity. TXA enhances neuronal excitation by antagonizing inhibitory γ-aminobutyric acid type A and glycine receptors. Until now, mechanistic-based pharmacological treatments targeting multiple central nervous system receptors have been advocated for use in such cases, with no data on intrathecal TXA elimination techniques.Case presentationA patient scheduled for hip surgery accidentally received 350 mg of intrathecal TXA instead of levobupivacaine. The clinical picture progressed from spinal segmental myoclonus to generalized convulsions and malignant arrhythmias. The treatment consisted of ventriculolumbar perfusion with normal saline at a rate of 50 mL/hour starting 5 hours after TXA administration and inhalational sedation with sevoflurane, in addition to drugs acting on multiple receptors at different central nervous system levels. Over 2 months the neurological status improved, although it was not complete.ConclusionsFor the first time, the feasibility and possible clinical efficacy of combined treatment with ventriculolumbar perfusion and inhalational sedation with sevoflurane were demonstrated. A referral to a neurosurgical facility is recommended in patients with acute TXA-induced neurotoxicity and cardiotoxicity.

Use of MIRUS™ for MAC-driven application of isoflurane, sevoflurane, and desflurane in postoperative ICU patients: a randomized controlled trial

Background The MIRUS™ (TIM, Koblenz, Germany) is an electronical gas delivery system, which offers an automated MAC (minimal alveolar concentration)-driven application of isoflurane, sevoflurane, or desflurane, and can be used for sedation in the intensive care unit. We investigated its consumption of volatile anesthetics at 0.5 MAC (primary endpoint) and the corresponding costs. Secondary endpoints were the technical feasibility to reach and control the MAC automatically, the depth of sedation at 0.5 MAC, and awakening times. Mechanically ventilated and sedated patients after major surgery were enrolled. Upon arrival in the intensive care unit, patients obtained intravenous propofol sedation for at least 1 h to collect ventilation and blood gas parameters, before they were switched to inhalational sedation using MIRUS™ with isoflurane, sevoflurane, or desflurane. After a minimum of 2 h, inhalational sedation was stopped, and awakening times were recorded. A multivariate electroencephalogram and the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) were used to assess the depth of sedation. Vital signs, ventilation parameters, gas consumption, MAC, and expiratory gas concentrations were continuously recorded. Results Thirty patients obtained inhalational sedation for 18:08 [14:46–21:34] [median 1st–3rd quartiles] hours. The MAC was 0.58 [0.50–0.64], resulting in a Narcotrend Index of 37.1 [30.9–42.4] and a RASS of − 3.0 [− 4.0 to (− 3.0)]. The median gas consumption was significantly lowest for isoflurane ([ml h−1]: isoflurane: 3.97 [3.61–5.70]; sevoflurane: 8.91 [6.32–13.76]; and desflurane: 25.88 [20.38–30.82]; p < 0.001). This corresponds to average costs of 0.39 € h−1 for isoflurane, 2.14 € h−1 for sevoflurane, and 7.54 € h−1 for desflurane. Awakening times (eye opening [min]: isoflurane: 9:48 [4:15–20:18]; sevoflurane: 3:45 [0:30–6:30]; desflurane: 2:00 [1:00–6:30]; p = 0.043) and time to extubation ([min]: isoflurane: 10:10 [8:00–20:30]; sevoflurane: 7:30 [4:37–14:22]; desflurane: 3:00 [3:00–6:00]; p = 0.007) were significantly shortest for desflurane. Conclusions A target-controlled, MAC-driven automated application of volatile anesthetics is technically feasible and enables an adequate depth of sedation. Gas consumption was highest for desflurane, which is also the most expensive volatile anesthetic. Although awakening times were shortest, the actual time saving of a few minutes might be negligible for most patients in the intensive care unit. Thus, using desflurane seems not rational from an economic perspective. Trial registration Clinical Trials Registry (ref.: NCT03860129). Registered 24 September 2018—Retrospectively registered.