priorities in health care
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

41
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

11
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Anna Rybarczyk-Szwajkowska ◽  
Izabela Rydlewska-Liszkowska

Identification of health priorities is concerned with equitable distribution of resources and is an important part of strategic planning in the health care system. The aim of this article is to describe health priorities in the Polish health care system from the patients’ perspective. The study included 533 patients hospitalized in the Lodz region. The average age of the respondents was 48.5 years and one third (36.6%) had university education. Most of the respondents (64.9%) negatively assessed the functioning of the health care system in Poland. Most of them claimed the following aspects require improvements: financing health services (85.8%), determining priorities in health care (80.3%), the role of health insurance (80.3%), and medical education (70.8%). Over 70% of the respondents agreed the role of politicians in designing and implementing health system reforms should be limited. The fact that the respondents so negatively assessed the Polish health care system implies there is a need for full discussion on redefining health priorities.


2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (9) ◽  
pp. 885 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua A. Gordon ◽  
Shelli Avenevoli ◽  
Jane L. Pearson

2019 ◽  
Vol 126 (S4) ◽  
pp. 5-6
Author(s):  
Nynke Broek ◽  
Patrick Chien ◽  
Mary McCauley ◽  
Anita Kaul

2012 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andriy Danyliv ◽  
Tetiana Stepurko ◽  
Irena Gryga ◽  
Milena Pavlova ◽  
Wim Groot

PLoS ONE ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. e23930 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adele Diederich ◽  
Jeannette Winkelhage ◽  
Norman Wirsik

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. A534
Author(s):  
EY Bae ◽  
MK Lim ◽  
SE Choi ◽  
TJ Lee

2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 398-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Berit Mørland ◽  
Ånen Ringard ◽  
John-Arne Røttingen

Objectives: We describe, in general, the principles used in priority setting and, in particular, policy processes and decision making in Norway.Methods: A newly established council for setting priorities in health care is presented to illustrate how health technology assessments (HTAs) can support national advisors in complex priority-setting processes.Results and Conclusions: Setting priorities in health care is a complex task. Careful thinking is, therefore, required in determining the components of a system for priority-setting. Based on recent Norwegian experiences, we believe that the following generic parts may provide some of the solution: a common set of values; an organizational structure made up of key stakeholders; supporting mechanisms in the form of HTA organizations and documented best evidence; and loyalty to decisions by stakeholders responsible for implementing national policies.


2008 ◽  
Vol 179 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Bruni ◽  
A. Laupacis ◽  
D. K. Martin ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document