social contracts theory
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

40
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

12
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-34
Author(s):  
Stefan Hielscher ◽  
Sebastian Everding ◽  
Ingo Pies

Can private companies legitimately regulate sharing markets, and if yes, how? Whereas scholars have either criticized sharing platforms for expanding into private and public arenas or welcomed them to counterbalance encroaching government regulations, studies document their unbridled popularity. On the basis of a special version of social contracts theory pioneered by James Buchanan, we develop a heuristics that helps guide reasoning about the legitimacy of the sharing economy’s regulatory function. First, we discuss the conditions under which free and responsible individuals deliberately subject themselves to rules without their prior direct participation, that is, exit, voice, and constitutional limits. Second, we suggest sharing platforms can use novel ordo-responsibilities to establish a sharing constitution that takes these conditions into account. Third, we argue that sharing platforms can legitimately do so within an enabling institutional environment in society, the provision of which relies on the joint efforts of sharing platforms, political actors, and civil society.


Author(s):  
Marta Rey-García

Este trabajo repasa los antecedentes y mecanismos de la reinvención del papel de las empresas en el contrato social contemporáneo en respuesta a dos preguntas: i) ¿puede convertirse la sostenibilidad en el principio ético global que guíe el nuevo contrato social?; y ii) ¿cómo se traduce ese principio en la toma de decisiones, las responsabilidades y las relaciones corporativas? Con el apoyo de la Integrative Social Contracts Theory y de literatura sobre responsabilidad social corporativa, se explora el papel de las empresas en un nuevo contrato social para la sostenibilidad.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (03) ◽  
pp. 317-342
Author(s):  
Markus Scholz ◽  
Gastón de los Reyes ◽  
N. Craig Smith

ABSTRACT:The profound influence of Thomas Donaldson and Thomas Dunfee’s integrative social contracts theory (ISCT) on the field of business ethics has been challenged by Andreas Scherer and Guido Palazzo’s Habermasian approach, which has achieved prominence of late with articles that expressly question the defensibility of ISCT’s hypernorms. This article builds on recent efforts by Donaldson and Scherer to bridge their accounts by providing discursive foundations to the hypernorms at the heart of the ISCT framework. Extending prior literature, we propose an ISCT* framework designed to retain ISCT’s practical virtue of managerial guidance while answering the demands of Scherer and Palazzo’s discursive account. By subscribing to a suitable portfolio of discursively justified hypernorms, we argue, companies unlock the valuable moral guidance of ISCT*, which says to treat these hypernorms as unequivocal outer bounds to the pursuit of business and as a starting point to tailor local norms through discursive stakeholder engagement.


2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (04) ◽  
pp. 489-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Georg Scherer

ABSTRACT: I explore the role of hypernorms in the Integrative Social Contracts Theory (ISCT) of Thomas Donaldson and Thomas W. Dunfee, who suggested that hypernorms are a necessary condition for the rejection of cultural relativism and justification of moral norms within and across social communities. Hypernorms are, thus, a significant part of a conception of international business ethics. I highlight philosophical problems that emerge in attempts to identify and justify hypernorms. These problems have not been sufficiently addressed in the ISCT; therefore, I will discuss the discourse–ethical contributions of contemporary German philosophers toward resolving the justification problem with regards to universal norms. Discourse ethics builds on the linguistic and the pragmatic turns in philosophy and develops procedural rules for the assessment of norms. I explore variants of discourse ethics with regards to their concept of justification and discuss the implications of discourse ethical procedures for the justification of norms and actions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document