An exploratory study of the relationship between systemic microcirculatory function and small solute transport in incident peritoneal dialysis patients

Background: The peritoneal capillary endothelium is widely considered to be the most influential structure in dictating the rate of small solute transport (SST) during peritoneal dialysis (PD). PD patients are at significant risk of systemic microcirculatory dysfunction. The relationship between peritoneal and systemic microcirculations in patients new to PD has not been well studied. We hypothesised that for patients on PD for less than 6 months, dysfunction in the systemic microcirculation would be reflected in the rate of SST. Methods: We recruited 29 patients to a cross-sectional, observational study. Rate of SST was measured using a standard peritoneal equilibration test. Laser Doppler Flowmetry was used to measure response to physical and pharmacological challenge (post-occlusive hyperaemic response and iontophoretic application of vasodilators) in the cutaneous microcirculation. Sidestream Darkfield imaging was used to assess sublingual microvascular density, flow and endothelial barrier properties. Results: We found no moderate or strong correlations between any of the measures of systemic microcirculatory function and rate of SST or albumin clearance. There was however a significant correlation between dialysate interleukin-6 concentrations and both SST ( rs = 0.758 p ≤ 0.0001) and albumin clearance ( rs = 0.53, p = 0.01). Conclusions: In this study, systemic microvascular dysfunction did not significantly influence the rate of SST even early in patients PD careers. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that intraperitoneal factors particularly inflammation have a far greater impact on rate of SST than systemic factors.

Myoglobin clearance with continuous veno-venous hemodialysis using high cutoff dialyzer versus continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration using high-flux dialyzer: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Background Myoglobin clearance in acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy is important because myoglobin has direct renal toxic effects. Clinical data comparing different modalities of renal replacement therapy addressing myoglobin clearance are limited. This study aimed to compare two renal replacement modalities regarding myoglobin clearance. Methods In this prospective, randomized, single-blinded, single-center trial, 70 critically ill patients requiring renal replacement therapy were randomized 1:1 into an intervention arm using continuous veno-venous hemodialysis with high cutoff dialyzer and a control arm using continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration postdilution with high-flux dialyzer. Regional citrate anticoagulation was used in both groups to maintain the extracorporeal circuit. The concentrations of myoglobin, urea, creatinine, β2-microglobulin, interleukin-6 and albumin were measured before and after the dialyzer at 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h and 48 h after initiating continuous renal replacement therapy. Results Thirty-three patients were allocated to the control arm (CVVHDF with high-flux dialyzer) and 35 patients to the intervention arm (CVVHD with high cutoff dialyzer). Myoglobin clearance, as a primary endpoint, was significantly better in the intervention arm than in the control arm throughout the whole study period. The clearance values for urea and creatinine were higher in the control arm. There was no measurable albumin clearance in both arms. The clearance data for β2-microglobulin and interleukin-6 were non-inferior in the intervention arm compared to those for the control arm. Dialyzer lifespan was 57.0 [38.0, 72.0] hours in the control arm and 70.0 [56.75, 72.0] hours in the intervention arm (p = 0.029). Conclusions Myoglobin clearance using continuous veno-venous hemodialysis with high cutoff dialyzer and regional citrate anticoagulation is better than that with continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration with regional citrate anticoagulation. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Registry (DRKS00012407); date of registration 23/05/2017. https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00012407.