uranium distribution
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

97
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

15
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Anandhan P ◽  
Chidambaram S ◽  
Manivannan R ◽  
Paramaguru P ◽  
Karthikeyan C ◽  
...  

An attempt has been made to examine uranium distribution in groundwater from Cuddalore district, Tamil Nadu, India. Groundwater occurs under porous sedimentary, fractured, and weathered hard rock formations ranging in age from recent sediments to the oldest Archean formations. A total of 186 groundwater samples were collected during Pre- Monsoon (May) and Post-monsoon (January) and analyzed for major cations, anions, and uranium using standard procedures. Major anions and cations follow the order Cl- >H4SiO4>HCO3- >NO3- > Na+> Ca2+> Mg2+>K+>SO42- > F-> PO43- irrespective of seasons. Uranium in groundwater ranges from 0.1 micro gram per liter (µg/l ) to 24.67 µg/l with average 1.82 µg/l. The spatial representation maps isolated areas of higher and lower uranium and statistical analysis inferred uranium sources to the groundwater environment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (19) ◽  
pp. 4677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Homma-Takeda ◽  
Numako ◽  
Kitahara ◽  
Yoshida ◽  
Oikawa ◽  
...  

Although the kidneys comprise a critical target of uranium exposure, the dynamics of renal uranium distribution have remained obscure. Uranium is considered to function physiologically in the form of uranyl ions that have high affinity for phosphate groups. The present study applied microbeam-based elemental analysis to precisely determine the distribution of phosphorus and uranium in the kidneys of male Wistar rats exposed to uranium. One day after a single subcutaneous injection of uranyl acetate (2 mg/kg), areas of concentrated phosphorus were scattered in the S3 segments of the proximal tubule of the kidneys, whereas the S3 segments in control rats and in rats given a lower dose of uranium (0.5 mg/kg) contained phosphorus without concentrated phosphorus. Areas with concentrated phosphorus contained uranium 4- to 14-fold more than the mean uranium concentration (126–472 vs. 33.1 ± 4.6 μg/g). The chemical form of uranium in the concentrated phosphorus examined by XAFS was uranium (VI), suggesting that the interaction of uranyl ions with the phosphate groups of biomolecules could be involved in the formation of uranium concentration in the proximal tubules of kidneys in rats exposed to uranium.


Chemosphere ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 219 ◽  
pp. 607-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanu Sharma ◽  
Arvesh Sharma ◽  
Inderpreet Kaur ◽  
R.K. Mahajan ◽  
P.K. Litoria ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 98 ◽  
pp. 09023
Author(s):  
Maria Isabel Prudêncio ◽  
Teresa Valente ◽  
Rosa Marques ◽  
Maria Amália Sequeira Braga ◽  
Jorge Pamplona

The abandoned Jales mining area is a sulphide-rich deposit (Northeast of Portugal). Acid mine drainage resulted from oxidation of sulphides is treated in a passive system with wetlands. The present work studies the thorium and uranium behaviour in the water and in the fine fractions of wetland soils throughout the passive treatment system. The evaluation of the efficiency of the all system was done determining metals concentration variation in the creek water upstream and downstream of the treated effluent discharge. The results point to higher efficiency to retain Th after summer than after winter. The opposite was found for uranium, which increases significantly in the creek water after summer and, in a lower extent, after winter. Also, Th and U have a tendency to increase in the fine fractions of the wetlands soils after summer, which can be explained by the longer water-soil contact/lower water dynamics. Nevertheless uranium has a much higher tendency to be in solution as revealed by a high concentration in the porewater of wetland soils. A relation of these actinides behaviour with the Fe and Mn distribution is not clear.


2018 ◽  
Vol 183 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 242-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Konishi ◽  
S Kodaira ◽  
Y Itakura ◽  
D Ohsawa ◽  
S Homma-Takeda

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 497-512
Author(s):  
C. M. Prazeres ◽  
M. J. Batista ◽  
A. J. Pinto ◽  
M. A. Gonçalves

2018 ◽  
Vol 81 (8) ◽  
pp. 855-864 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Suhard ◽  
C. Tessier ◽  
L. Manens ◽  
F. Rebière ◽  
K. Tack ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document