male philopatry
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

16
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

10
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 171006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shintaro Ishizuka ◽  
Yoshi Kawamoto ◽  
Tetsuya Sakamaki ◽  
Nahoko Tokuyama ◽  
Kazuya Toda ◽  
...  

Although both bonobos and chimpanzees are male-philopatric species, outcomes of male–male reproductive competition seem to be more closely associated with mating success in chimpanzees. This suggests that the extent of male reproductive skew is lower in bonobos. In addition, between-group male–male reproductive competition is more lethal in chimpanzees. This suggests that between-group differentiation in male kinship is lower in bonobos. We analysed the paternity of 17 offspring in two bonobo groups and estimated the relatedness of individuals among three neighbouring groups by using DNA extracted from non-invasive samples at Wamba, in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The alpha males sired at least nine of 17 offspring. This supports a previous finding that the male reproductive skew is higher in bonobos than that in chimpanzees. Average relatedness among males within groups was significantly higher than that among males across groups, whereas there was no significant difference among females between within and across groups. These results are consistent with male philopatry, highly skewed reproductive success of males and female dispersal. Higher average relatedness among males within groups suggest that the differences in hostility towards males of different groups between bonobos and chimpanzees may be explained by factors other than kinship.


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Linus Günther ◽  
Mirjam Knörnschild ◽  
Martina Nagy ◽  
Frieder Mayer

2016 ◽  
Vol 70 (10) ◽  
pp. 1727-1733 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veli-Matti Pakanen ◽  
Kari Koivula ◽  
Markku Orell ◽  
Seppo Rytkönen ◽  
Kimmo Lahti

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 20150992 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. J. Nichols ◽  
L. Zecherle ◽  
K. Arbuckle

While menopause has long been known as a characteristic trait of human reproduction, evidence for post-reproductive lifespan (PRLS) has recently been found in other mammals. Adaptive and non-adaptive hypotheses have been proposed to explain the evolution of PRLS, but formal tests of these are rare. We use a phylogenetic approach to evaluate hypotheses for the evolution of PRLS among mammals. In contrast to theoretical models predicting that PRLS may be promoted by male philopatry (which increases relatedness between a female and her group in old age), we find little evidence that male philopatry led to the evolution of a post-reproductive period. However, the proportion of life spent post-reproductive was related to lifespan and patterns of philopatry, suggesting that the duration of PRLS may be impacted by both non-adaptive and adaptive processes. Finally, the proportion of females experiencing PRLS was higher in species with male philopaty and larger groups, in accordance with adaptive models of PRLS. We suggest that the origin of PRLS primarily follows the non-adaptive ‘mismatch’ scenario, but that patterns of philopatry may subsequently confer adaptive benefits of late-life helping.


2013 ◽  
Vol 152 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filippo Aureli ◽  
Anthony Di Fiore ◽  
Evin Murillo-Chacon ◽  
Shoji Kawamura ◽  
Colleen M. Schaffner

2008 ◽  
Vol 137 (3) ◽  
pp. 256-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eiji Inoue ◽  
Miho Inoue-Murayama ◽  
Linda Vigilant ◽  
Osamu Takenaka ◽  
Toshisada Nishida

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document