More Anterior in vivo Contact Position in Patients With Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty During Daily Activities Than in vitro Wear Simulator

BackgroundWhile in vitro wear simulation of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) showed outstanding long-term wear performance, studies reported that polyethylene (PE) wear was responsible for 12% fixed-bearing (FB) UKA failure. This paper aimed to quantify the in vivo 6-degrees-of-freedom (6-DOF) knee kinematics and contact positions of FB UKA during daily activities and compare with the previous results of in vitro wear simulator.MethodsFourteen patients following unilateral medial FB UKA received a CT scan and dual fluoroscopic imaging during level walking, single-leg deep lunge, and sit-to-stand motion for evaluating in vivo 6-DOF FB UKA kinematics. The closest point between surface models of the femoral condyle and PE insert was determined to locate the medial compartmental articular contact positions, which were normalized relative to the PE insert length. The in vivo contact area was compared with the in vitro wear region in previous simulator studies.ResultsThe in vivo contact positions during daily activities were more anterior than those in the previous in vitro wear simulator studies (p < 0.001). Significant differences in the femoral anteroposterior translation and tibial internal rotation during the stance phase were observed and compared with those in lunge and sit-to-stand motions (p < 0.05). The in vivo contact position located anteriorly and medially by 5.2 ± 2.7 and 1.8 ± 1.6 mm on average for the stance phase, 1.0 ± 2.4 and 0.9 ± 1.5 mm for the lunge, and 2.1 ± 3.3 and 1.4 ± 1.4 mm for sit-to-stand motion. The in vivo contact position was in the more anterior part during the stance phase (p < 0.05).ConclusionThe current study revealed that the contact position of FB UKA was located anteriorly and medially on the PE insert during in vivo weight-bearing activities and different from previous findings of the in vitro wear simulator. We should take in vivo 6-DOF knee kinematics and contact patterns of FB UKA into account to reproduce realistic wear performance for in vitro wear simulator and to improve implant design.

Influence of Metallic Deposition on Ceramic Femoral Heads on the Wear Behavior of Artificial Hip Joints: A Simulator Study

Several retrieval studies have reported on metallic depositions on ceramic femoral heads, but the effect on the wear behavior of artificial hip joints has not been investigated in wear simulator studies. In the present study, retrieved ceramic heads with metallic depositions as third particles were tested against cross-linked ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) liners in a hip wear simulator. The amount of liner wear and expansion of metallic depositions on the heads were determined before and after wear testing with digital microscopy. The surface roughness of the heads was investigated in areas with and without metallic depositions by laser scanning microscopy. After five million load cycles, a non-significant reduction in the metallic formation on the retrieved heads was found. The metallic areas showed a higher surface roughness compared to unconcerned areas. The liners showed a higher wear rate of 1.57 ± 1.36 mg/million cycles for 28 mm heads and 2.42 ± 0.82 mg/million cycles for 36 mm heads with metallic depositions, in comparison with new ceramic heads with a 28 mm size ((−0.06 ± 0.89) mg/million cycles) and 36 mm size ((2.04 ± 0.46) mg/million cycles). Metallic transfer on ceramic heads can lead to an increased surface roughness and higher wear rates at the UHMWPE liners. Therefore, metallic contact of the ceramic femoral head should be avoided.

Total Articular Knee Replacement Using Polyurethane

This study reviewed the early use of polyurethane for total knee resurfacing, the long-term results of polycarbonate urethane (PCU) for total knee replacement and conducted wear simulator testing of PCU. In 1959 and 1960, 10 patients underwent total articular polyurethane knee replacement (polyethylene was not available). The polyurethane was placed on the articular surface of the femur with metal surfaces on the tibia and patella. In 1996 and 1997, four patients received a newer PCU tibial insert in revision procedures; all had well-fixed prostheses, but no revision polyethylene implants were available. In addition, this study evaluated six new PCU tibial inserts in a 10-million cycle (Mc) wear simulator. All 10 of the early knees performed well clinically and 2 knees were functional for more than 30 years. Of the four more recent patients, all knees remain functional at more than 20 years' follow-up with no signs of wear or osteolysis. Wear simulator testing found mean material loss of 14.2 mg/Mc which equates to a volumetric wear of 11.9 mg/Mc, similar to the wear of conventional polyethylene. Polyurethane performs well as conventional polyethylene but not better than current cross-linked polyethylene tibial inserts. Its large wear particles (mean, 11 µm) and biocompatibility are less likely to cause an inflammatory response leading to pain and bone loss. Newer, superior polyurethanes can again be considered a candidate material for the tibial insert of a total knee replacement. A larger study may be able to validate polyurethane as an alternative material for joint replacement.