artificial hip joints
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

179
(FIVE YEARS 9)

H-INDEX

36
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Yujie Han ◽  
Feng Liu ◽  
Kedong Zhang ◽  
Qiang Huang ◽  
Xuhong Guo ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Youngseob Seo ◽  
Zhiyue J. Wang

AbstractA primary safety concern in a magnetic resonance imaging environment is heating of metallic implants by absorbing radiofrequency (RF) energy during MRI scanning. Experimental measurement in conjunction with computational modeling was used to evaluate the risk of biological tissue injury from the RF heating of artificial hip joints by obtaining both specific absorption rate (SAR) and temperature elevation at 1.5 T and 3 T MRI systems. Simulation result showed that high SAR and high temperature appeared near both head and tail sections of the artificial hip joints. For five different 1.5 T and 3 T MRI systems, measured temperature location showed that high temperature rises occurred near both head and tail regions of the metallic hip joints. Measured SAR value of 24.6 W/kg and the high temperature rise (= 4.22 °C) occurred in the tail region of the hip joint at 1.5 T, which was higher than the limits for temperature required by the international electrotechnical commission 60601-2-33. We have demonstrated the feasibility of evaluating RF heating of metallic hip joints during MRI scans.


2021 ◽  
pp. 286-293
Author(s):  
Zhouyao Weng ◽  
Xiuling Huang ◽  
Zikai Hua ◽  
Qinye Wang ◽  
Leiming Gao

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 769-775
Author(s):  
◽  
Joko Triyono ◽  
Aditya Rio Prabowo ◽  
Jung Min Sohn

AbstractHip joint is an important human joints system. The damaged hip joints need to be replaced with artificial hip joints. The Study of the hip joint is very costly therefore another calculation method is demanded to produce good result in acceptable time and cost. Considering this problem, a series of study to assess hip joint performance is conducted using numerical approach. Important parameter for example applied materials are used in the modelling by idealizing Ti-6Al-4V compared to SS 316 L, and stemlengthwas chosen to be 128 mm. ANSYS software was used to analyze models, and designed element size variations were set to be in range 1 to 2.5 mm. The magnitude of force was placed on the femoral head with an angle of 16∘C from the vertical axis. Results showed that SS 316 L material has smaller deformation than Ti material. Whereas Central Processing (CP) time decreases in increasing element size for both materials. In addition, more variations in mesh size are needed to get more accurate convergent results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document