rpob mutation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

19
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Tianwei Shen ◽  
Kelsi Penewit ◽  
Adam Waalkes ◽  
Libin Xu ◽  
Stephen J Salipante ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives Tedizolid is an oxazolidinone antimicrobial with activity against Gram-positive bacteria, including MRSA. Tedizolid resistance is uncommon and tedizolid’s capacity to select for cross-resistance to other antimicrobials is incompletely understood. The objective of this study was to further explore the phenotypic and genetic basis of tedizolid resistance in MRSA. Methods We selected for tedizolid resistance in an MRSA laboratory strain, N315, by serial passage until an isolate with an MIC ≥1 log2 dilution above the breakpoint for resistance (≥2 mg/L) was recovered. This isolate was subjected to WGS and susceptibility to a panel of related and unrelated antimicrobials was tested in order to determine cross-resistance. Homology modelling was performed to evaluate the potential impact of the mutation on target protein function. Results After 10 days of serial passage we recovered a phenotypically stable mutant with a tedizolid MIC of 4 mg/L. WGS revealed only one single nucleotide variant (A1345G) in rpoB, corresponding to amino acid substitution D449N. MICs of linezolid, chloramphenicol, retapamulin and quinupristin/dalfopristin increased by ≥2 log2 dilutions, suggesting the emergence of the so-called ‘PhLOPSa’ resistance phenotype. Susceptibility to other drugs, including rifampicin, was largely unchanged. Homology models revealed that the mutated residue of RNA polymerase would be unlikely to directly affect oxazolidinone action. Conclusions To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that an rpoB mutation has been implicated in resistance to PhLOPSa antimicrobials. The mechanism of resistance remains unclear, but is likely indirect, involving σ-factor binding or other alterations in transcriptional regulation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 570
Author(s):  
M. Grobbelaar ◽  
S. L. Sampson ◽  
M. De Vos ◽  
G. E. Louw ◽  
P. D. Van Helden ◽  
...  

.


2019 ◽  
Vol 146 ◽  
pp. 71-75
Author(s):  
In Young Yoo ◽  
Hee Jae Huh ◽  
On-Kyun Kang ◽  
Byung Woo Jhun ◽  
Won-Jung Koh ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria L. Campodónico ◽  
Dalin Rifat ◽  
Yu-Min Chuang ◽  
Thomas R. Ioerger ◽  
Petros C. Karakousis

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 572-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christophe Isnard ◽  
Marguerite Fines-Guyon ◽  
François-Xavier Toublet ◽  
François Guerin ◽  
Christine Rogowski ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoting Hua ◽  
Tingting Qu ◽  
Xi Li ◽  
Qiong Chen ◽  
Zhi Ruan ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 167 (8) ◽  
pp. 625-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yali Xie ◽  
Zhengqiang Liu ◽  
Guoyong Zhang ◽  
Xiangtao Mo ◽  
Xuezhi Ding ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Neha S. Shah ◽  
SY Grace Lin ◽  
Pennan M. Barry ◽  
Yi-Ning Cheng ◽  
Gisela Schecter ◽  
...  

Abstract Background.  Data from international settings suggest that isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with rpoB mutations testing phenotypically susceptible to rifampin (RIF) may have clinical significance. We analyzed treatment outcomes of California patients with discordant molecular-phenotypic RIF results. Methods.  We included tuberculosis (TB) patients, during 2003–2013, whose specimens tested RIF susceptible phenotypically but had a rpoB mutation determined by pyrosequencing. Demographic data were abstracted from the California TB registry. Phenotypic drug-susceptibility testing, medical history, treatment, and outcomes were abstracted from medical records. Results.  Of 3330 isolates tested, 413 specimens had a rpoB mutation (12.4%). Of these, 16 (3.9%) had molecular-phenotypic discordant RIF results. Seven mutations were identified: 511Pro, 516Phe, 526Asn, 526Ser (AGC and TCC), 526Cys, and 533Pro. Fourteen (88%) had isoniazid (INH) resistance, 6 of whom were also phenotypically resistant to ethambutol (EMB) and/or pyrazinamide (PZA). Five patients (25%), 1 with 511Pro and 4 with 526Asn, relapsed or failed treatment. The initial regimen for 3 patients was RIF, PZA, and EMB; 1 patient received RIF, PZA, EMB, and a fluoroquinolone (FQN); and 1 patient received RIF, EMB, FQN, and some second-line medications. Upon retreatment with an expanded regimen, 3 (75%) patients completed treatment, 1 patient moved before treatment completion, and 1 patient continues on treatment. The remaining 11 patients had a successful outcome with 9 having received a FQN and/or a rifamycin. Conclusions.  Rifampin molecular-phenotypic discordance was rare, and most isolates had INH resistance. Patients who did not receive an expanded regimen had poor outcomes. These mutations may have clinical importance, and expanded treatment regimens should be considered.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document