protein marking
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

9
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Peter A. Henderson

The main methods used to estimate population size using capture–recapture for both closed and open populations are described, including the Peterson–Lincoln estimator, the Schabel census, Bailey’s triple catch, the Jolly–Seber stochastic method, and Cormack’s log-linear method. The robust design approach is described. R code listings for commonly used packages are presented. The assumptions common to capture–recapture methods are reviewed, and tests for assumptions such as equal catchability described. The use of programs to select model assumptions are described. The main methods for marking different animal groups are described, together with the use of natural marks and parasites and DNA. Marking methods include paint marks, dyes, tagging, protein marking, DNA, natural marks, tattooing, and mutilation. Methods for handling and release are described.


2021 ◽  
pp. 247255522199110
Author(s):  
Johanna M. Kastl ◽  
Gareth Davies ◽  
Eleanor Godsman ◽  
Geoffrey A. Holdgate

Targeted protein degradation (TPD) is a recent strategy, utilizing the cell’s proteostasis machinery to deplete specific proteins. This represents a paradigm shift in early drug discovery, away from occupancy-driven to event-driven mechanisms. Recent efforts have focused on the development of proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs). These heterobifunctional molecules combine a target-specific binding moiety linked to an E3 ligase ligand and trigger selective ubiquitination of the target protein, marking it for proteasomal degradation. While these molecules can be highly efficacious, they generally have unfavorable physicochemical properties due to their large size. In contrast, smaller molecules that induce degradation could represent an attractive, simple option to overcoming the limitations of both traditional modulators and PROTACs. These molecules may have a range of mechanisms: recruitment of an E3 ligase (molecular glues), introduction of hydrophobic areas, or inducing local unfolding, each of which triggers degradation. We recently completed a high-throughput screen of 111,000 compounds in a cellular HiBiT assay in an effort to identify such molecules. Preliminary analysis indicates that we have been able to identify alternative small-molecule degraders. We highlight methods for triage, characterization, selectivity, and mode of action. In summary, we believe that these types of small-molecule degraders, which may possibly have more acceptable physicochemical properties than the inherently larger heterobifunctional molecules, are an exciting approach for inducing TPD, and we illustrate that a general screening approach can be successful in identifying useful start points for developing such molecules.


2017 ◽  
Vol 151 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna A. Torgasheva ◽  
Pavel M. Borodin

Studies on mammals demonstrate wide interspecific variation in the number and distribution of recombination events along chromosomes. Birds represent an interesting model group for comparative analysis of cytological and ecological drivers of recombination rate evolution. Yet, data on variation in recombination rates in birds are limited to a dozen of species. In this study, we used immunolocalization of MLH1, a mismatch repair protein marking mature recombination nodules, to estimate the overall recombination rate and distribution of crossovers along macrochromosomes in female and male meiosis of the gray goose (Anser anser). The average number of MLH1 foci was significantly higher in oocytes than in spermatocytes (73.6 ± 7.8 and 58.9 ± 7.6, respectively). MLH1 foci distribution along individual macrobivalents showed subtelomeric peaks, which were more pronounced in males. Analysis of distances between neighboring MLH1 foci on macrobivalents revealed stronger crossover interference in male meiosis. These data create a framework for future genetic and physical mapping of the gray goose.


2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 1183-1187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beth A. Choate ◽  
Jonathan G. Lundgren
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances S. Sivakoff ◽  
Jay A. Rosenheim ◽  
James R. Hagler

1991 ◽  
Vol 88 (9) ◽  
pp. 3782-3786 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. M. Paterson ◽  
U. Walldorf ◽  
J. Eldridge ◽  
A. Dubendorfer ◽  
M. Frasch ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document