Emplazamiento del tiempo compartido en la clasificación de los derechos reales

Este artículo comenta un fenómeno reciente de aprovechamiento “periódico y por turnos” de inmuebles o de cosas muebles, que generan vínculos jurídicos de Derecho Real o de Derecho Personal. La primera normativa sobre el tema en nuestro país fue la Ley 26356 sancionada y vigente en 2008, referida a los “Sistemas Turísticos de Tiempo Compartido” (STTC), actualmente derogada en parte, y sustituida por el CCCN., que legisla, en el Título VI del Libro IV, sobre el Derecho Real de Tiempo Compartido y que ha trascendido el original destino turístico de la afectación, extendiéndolo para finalidades industriales, comerciales y otras. También se ha incluido como objetos de esta Relación Jurídica, que en la ley anterior eran solamente los edificios afectados a hospedaje, y que actualmente pueden ser también inmuebles con otros destinos, o cosas muebles, como embarcaciones, automotores, equipos médicos, etc. Sin perjuicio de la afectación del Tiempo Compartido como Derecho Real, se permiten también el alquiler y otros derechos personales sobre los turnos de uso. ABSTRACTThis paper comment son a recent phenomenon of "periodic and shift" use of real estate or personal property, which generates legal ties of Real Lawor Personal Law. The first regulation on the subject in our country was Law 26356 sanctioned and in force in 2008, refer ringto the “TimeshareTouristSystems” (STTC), currentlyrepealed in part, and replacedbythe CCCN., whichlegislates, in theTitle VI of Book IV, onthe Real Time SharingRight andwhich has transcended the original tourist destination of the affectation, extending it for industrial, commercial and other purposes. It has also been included as objects of this LegalRelationship, which in the previous law were only building saffected by accommodation, and which currently can also be real estate with other destinations, or movable things, such as boats, automobiles, medical equipment, etc. Without prejudice to the affectation of Timeshare as Real Right, rental and other personal rights are also allowedont he shifts of use.

On the logical properties of Keynes’s theorising, and different approaches to the Keynes–institutionalism nexus

This paper replies to Hodgson (2019), which responds to my analysis and critique in O'Donnell (2018). My present aim is clarification of our respective positions, our agreements and disagreements, and their underlying causes. To this end, I elaborate further on the logic underpinning my initial paper, comment on several (not all) key points in Hodgson's response, and conclude with the matter of our different agendas. Space limitations preclude fuller discussion and encourage concise expression.

Neuroleptic Management of Schizophrenia: A Survey and Commentary on Australian Psychiatric Practice

Objective: We seek to assess Australian psychiatrists' views and practices concerning provision of neuroleptic medication to patients with schizophrenia, and to determine whether such management strategies are likely to have changed over time and the extent to which they correspond to published treatment guidelines. Method: A sample of 139 psychiatrists based in three Australian capital cities was derived, with respondents completing a brief questionnaire by choosing from a limited-option answer set. Co-authors of this paper comment on the extent to which responses are in line with contemporary recommendations driven by experts or empirical studies. Results: Overall, survey findings indicate that there has been considerable change in clinical practice over the last decade and provide some estimate of the extent to which Australian management practices are congruent with contemporary recommendations. We identify a number of issues of concern (more in relation to dose levels of neuroleptic medication rather than treatment duration) revealed by survey data and make recommendations for addressing a number of practical clinical issues. Conclusions: As this report focuses on central issues involved in managing schizophrenia, and integrates a number of treatment guidelines, we suggest that it should be of assistance for practice review by clinicians.