prestriate cortex
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

42
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

22
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshihito Shigihara ◽  
Hideyuki Hoshi ◽  
Semir Zeki

AbstractPrevious studies with the visual motion and form systems show that visual stimuli belonging to these categories trigger much earlier latency responses from the visual cortex than previously supposed and that the source of the earliest signals can be located in either the prestriate cortex or in both the striate (V1) and prestriate cortex. This is consistent with the known anatomical connections since, in addition to the classical retino-geniculo-striate cortex input, there are direct anatomical inputs from both the lateral geniculate nucleus and the pulvinar that reach the prestriate visual cortex without passing through V1. In pursuing our studies, we thought it especially interesting to study another cardinal visual attribute, namely colour, to learn whether colour stimuli also provoke very early responses, at less than 50 ms, from visual cortex. To address the question, we asked participants to view stimuli that changed in colour and used magneto-encephalography to detect very early responses (< 50 ms) in the occipital visual cortex. Our results show that coloured stimuli also provoke an early cortical response (M30), with an average peak time at 30.8 ms, thus bringing the colour system into line with the visual motion and form systems. We conclude that colour signals reach visual cortex, including prestriate visual cortex, earlier than previously supposed.Key points summaryWe measured visual evoked responses to colour stimuli using magnetoencephalography.An early response was identified, at around 30 ms after stimulation.The sources of the response were estimated to be in prestriate cortex.Colour signals thus appear to evoke very early cortical responses, just like form and motion signals.Abbreviations listMEGmagnetoencephalography;LGNlateral geniculate nucleus;EEGelectroencephalography;ISIinter-stimulus interval;VEFvisual evoked magnetic field;SNRsignal to noise ratio;fTfemto Tesla;ANOVAanalysis of variance;MSPmultiple sparse priors;MRImagnetic resonance imaging;RMSroot-mean-square;SOIsensor of interest.


Neuroreport ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 1881-1886 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Woelbern ◽  
Reinhard Eckhorn ◽  
Axel Frien ◽  
Roman Bauer

1998 ◽  
Vol 123 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 154-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Clarke ◽  
Vincent Walsh ◽  
Alain Schoppig ◽  
G. Assal ◽  
Alan Cowey

1996 ◽  
Vol 263 (1370) ◽  
pp. 633-640 ◽  

We have examined visual discrimination of orientation for bars and edges presented to the ‘blind’ hemifield of a patient, GY, who has an extensive lesion involving the left striate and prestriate cortex. The patient’s residual vision in response to transient light stimulation of his ‘blind’ hemifield has been well characterized, and it provides discrimination on the basis of differences in target velocity, flicker frequency or colour. We now show that using his residual vision, GY can identify accurately the orientation of a flickering bar, although his performance is sub-normal for bars shorter than 10 deg. He is, however, unable to identify the orientation of a one-dimensional grating presented within a circular aperture, and is unable to detect a grating structure formed by equiluminant coloured bars or by alternating, equiluminant flickering and steady bars. We also show that he has poor orientation discrimination for edges formed by colour contrast, by contrast between moving stimuli or by flicker contrast. We conclude that in the absence of the striate cortical input, the residual mechanisms which provide discriminations for colour, flicker or movement are not well organized for the detection and discrimination of stimulus orientation. We discuss the physiological mechanisms responsible for the various aspects of GY’s residual vision.


1991 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 242-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Don Krieger ◽  
Robert J. Sclabassi ◽  
Richard Coppola ◽  
Richard Nakamura

The primary experimental objective of this work was to demonstrate localization and temporal sequencing of the functional steps carried out by nonhuman primate subjects during performance of a sensory discrimination task, i.e., to identify the locale and sequence of activation of regions that participate in sensory discrimination, stimulus classification, and response preparation. Multivariate statistical procedures were applied to evoked transcortical recordings to identify the location and order of occurrence of signals that are effective in discriminating task conditions and parameters. (1) Sensory discrimination, (2) stimulus classification, and (3) response preparation occurred in the expected sequence. Information that enabled discrimination using these procedures was distributed widely across the cortex; however, the maximum information content was localized to striate and prestriate cortex, anterior inferior parietal cortex, and temporal and premotor cortex, respectively. This work provides a perspective on brain mechanisms responsible for cognition and demonstrates a set of powerful multivariate analytic tools for functional mapping, i.e., identifying the location and sequencing of cognitive functions.


1991 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
pp. 1115-1133 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. M. Davidson ◽  
D. B. Bender

1. Cells in the superficial layers of the colliculus were studied in immobilized monkeys anesthetized with nitrous oxide. We examined sensitivity to the relative motion between two stimuli: a small target in a cell's receptive field and a large random-dot background pattern that filled most of the visual field outside the receptive field. 2. Most cells were nonselective for either target direction or speed when the background pattern was stationary but were selective for both direction and speed relative to a moving background. Selectivity for relative motion was independent of the absolute direction and speed of both target and background. When both moved at the same speed in the same direction, the response evoked by the target was strongly suppressed. Changing the background direction relative to the target reduced the suppression; suppression was minimal when the two moved in opposite directions. Selectivity for relative direction was broad: the average tuning width at half-amplitude was 136 degrees. When target and background moved in the same direction, increasing or decreasing background speed relative to the target likewise reduced suppression. Average tuning width for relative speed was 1.4 log units. 3. Selectivity for relative motion was a global phenomenon. Suppression was present even when the background pattern was excluded from a region 10 times the receptive-field diameter. However, suppression gradually diminished with increasing distance between the receptive field and the background pattern. 4. Relative motion selectivity was most common in the deeper part of the superficial layers. Ninety percent of the cells below the middle of the stratum griseum superficiale were selective for relative direction, whereas above this level only 45% of the cells were. 5. Cells in the magnocellular and parvocellular layers of the lateral geniculate nucleus did not show selectivity for relative direction. 6. We suggest that the lower one-half of the superficial grey layer and the stratum opticum together constitute a subdivision of the superior colliculus that is specialized to detect strong discontinuities in relative motion. Descending input by way of the corticotectal tract is probably essential for the detection process. the projections from this tectal motion zone to the pulvinar, and from there to prestriate cortex, may provide a feedback pathway through which motion discontinuities such as occur at dynamic occlusion boundaries can influence local feature detection by cortical neurons.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document