Dentate Gyrus Somatostatin Cells are Required for Contextual Discrimination During Episodic Memory Encoding

Memory systems ought to store and discriminate representations of similar experiences in order to efficiently guide future decisions. This problem is solved by pattern separation, implemented in the dentate gyrus (DG) by granule cells to support episodic memory formation. Pattern separation is enabled by tonic inhibitory bombardment generated by multiple GABAergic cell populations that strictly maintain low activity levels in granule cells. Somatostatin-expressing cells are one of those interneuron populations, selectively targeting the distal dendrites of granule cells, where cortical multimodal information reaches the DG. Nonetheless, somatostatin cells have very low connection probability and synaptic efficacy with both granule cells and other interneuron types. Hence, the role of somatostatin cells in DG circuitry, particularly in the context of pattern separation, remains uncertain. Here, by using optogenetic stimulation and behavioral tasks in mice, we demonstrate that somatostatin cells are required for the acquisition of both contextual and spatial overlapping memories.

Septal Signaling Suppresses Seizures Through Stimulating Somatostatin Cells

[Box: see text]

Dentate gyrus somatostatin cells are required for contextual discrimination during episodic memory encoding

Episodic memory establishes and stores relations among the different elements of an experience, which are often similar and difficult to distinguish. Pattern separation, implemented by the dentate gyrus, is a neural mechanism that allows the discrimination of similar experiences by orthogonalizing synaptic inputs. Granule cells support such disambiguation by sparse rate coding, a process tightly controlled by highly diversified GABAergic neuronal populations, such as somatostatin-expressing cells which directly target the dendritic arbor of granule cells, massively innervated by entorhinal inputs reaching the molecular layer and conveying contextual information. Here, we tested the hypothesis that somatostatin neurons regulate the excitability of the dentate gyrus, thus controlling the efficacy of pattern separation during memory encoding in mice. Indeed, optogenetic suppression of dentate gyrus somatostatin neurons increased spiking activity in putative excitatory neurons and triggered dentate spikes. Moreover, optical inhibition of somatostatin neurons impaired both contextual and spatial discrimination of overlapping episodic-like memories during task acquisition. Importantly, effects were specific for similar environments, suggesting that pattern separation was selectively engaged when overlapping conditions ought to be distinguished. Overall, our results suggest that somatostatin cells regulate excitability in the dentate gyrus and are required for effective pattern separation during episodic memory encoding.Significance statementMemory systems must be able to discriminate stored representations of similar experiences in order to efficiently guide future decisions. This is solved by pattern separation, implemented in the dentate gyrus by granule cells to support episodic memory formation. The tonic inhibitory bombardment produced by multiple GABAergic cell populations maintains low activity levels in granule cells, permitting the process of pattern separation. Somatostatin-expressing cells are one of those interneuron populations, selectively targeting the distal dendrites of granule cells, where cortical multimodal information reaches the dentate gyrus. Hence, somatostatin cells constitute an ideal candidate to regulate pattern separation. Here, by using optogenetic stimulation in mice, we demonstrate that somatostatin cells are required for the acquisition of both contextual and spatial overlapping memories.

Opposing spatial gradients of inhibition and neural activity in mouse olfactory cortex

The spatial representation of stimuli in primary sensory cortices is a convenient scaffold for elucidating the circuit mechanisms underlying sensory processing. In contrast, the anterior piriform cortex (APC) lacks topology for odor identity and appears homogenous in terms of afferent and intracortical excitatory circuitry. Here, we show that an increasing rostral-caudal (RC) gradient of inhibition onto pyramidal cells is commensurate with a decrease in active neurons along the RC axis following exploration of a novel odor environment. This inhibitory gradient is supported by somatostatin interneurons that provide an opposing, rostrally-biased, gradient of inhibition to interneurons. Optogenetic or chemogenetic modulation of somatostatin cells neutralizes the inhibitory gradient onto pyramidal cells. This suggests a novel circuit mechanism whereby opposing spatial gradients of inhibition and disinhibition regulate neural activity along the RC-axis. These findings challenge our current understanding of the spatial profiles of neural circuits and odor processing within APC.

Basal forebrain gating by somatostatin neurons drives cortical activity

The basal forebrain provides modulatory input to the cortex regulating brain states and cognitive processing. Somatostatin-expressing cells constitute a local GABAergic source known to functionally inhibit the major cortically-projecting cell types. However, it remains unclear if somatostatin cells can regulate the basal forebrain’s synaptic output and thus control cortical dynamics. Here, we demonstrate in mice that somatostatin neurons regulate the corticopetal synaptic output of the basal forebrain impinging on cortical activity and behavior. Optogenetic inactivation of somatostatin neurons in vivo increased spiking of some basal forebrain cells, rapidly enhancing and desynchronizing neural activity in the prefrontal cortex, inhibiting slow rhythms and increasing gamma oscillations. Locomotor activity was specifically increased in quiescent animals, but not in active mice. Altogether, we provide physiological and behavioral evidence indicating that somatostatin cells are pivotal in gating the synaptic output of the basal forebrain, thus indirectly controlling cortical operations via both cholinergic and non-cholinergic mechanisms.