Measuring the Impact of Human-Centered Design Research

Background/Objective: Human-centered design (HCD) is an approach to research that aims to facilitate participant engagement in research studies. Research Jam is the Patient Engagement Core of the Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (Indiana CTSI) that applies HCD to health research. The objective of this project is to assess the impact and efficacy of the HCD approach in health research. This project follows-up with previous investigators who have completed a project with Research Jam to measure impact on investigators’ attitudes towards HCD and participant engagement as well as the efficacy and implementation of the project-specific tools and deliverables that resulted from the work with Research Jam. Project Methods: A survey was developed in Qualtrics and sent to investigators (N=34) from Research Jam’s portfolio of completed projects (2015-2020). Five follow-up interviews were conducted and analyzed in NVivo. Results: Survey response rate was 50%. Of the projects listed by the investigators, 89% had deliverables that were reported as feasible and relevant to the target audience. Long-term sustainability of the deliverables showed room for improvement. For all projects, 81% were reported to have helped the investigator learn how to better engage with participants to inform their subsequent research. Potential Impact: These findings demonstrate that HCD produces deliverables that are feasible and relevant to target audiences, and health researchers view HCD as a useful method to engage more directly with research participants. These results can serve as a guide for Research Jam to continue to refine processes, such as improving long-term sustainability of the deliverables, and to direct future projects.

Dementia Risk in Older Veterans With Frailty: A Cross-Sectional Study

Frailty, a clinical syndrome characterized by vulnerability to stressors resulting from multisystemic loss of physiological reserve, predicts future cognitive decline. However, frailty has also been proposed as a dementia risk factor, predicting future cognitive impairment. The study aim was to determine frailty in older veterans and its association with risk of dementia. Community-dwelling Veterans ≥50 years completed a mailed socio-demographic questionnaire and Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination (SAGE), July 2019-May 2020. The information was complemented with EHR data. We calculated the CAIDE score, a validated tool predicting dementia (≥6 points= high risk 20 years later) and the 31-item VA frailty index data (frail ≥.20, non-frail ≤.20). After adjusting for socio-demographic characteristics, smoking, alcohol/substance abuse, OSA and anticholinergic use, odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI were calculated using BLR to assess the cross-sectional association between frailty and dementia risk (CAIDE ≥6 points and MCI). The survey response rate was 19.75% (1,073 of 5,432). Participants mean age was 68.38 (SD=8.49) years, 57.50% (n=617) Caucasian, 69.34% (n=744) non-Hispanic, 95.81% (n=1,028) male, and 36.72% (n=394) frail. 11.84%(n=127) screened positive for MCI and 15.38% (n=165) for dementia. 689 (75.88%) veterans were at high risk for dementia of whom 426 (61.83%) were non-frail and 263 (38.17%) were frail. Frailty was cross-sectionally associated with higher risk for dementia in older Veterans, adjusted OR:1.45 (95%CI:1.016-2.070), p=.041. The mailed screening was a feasible and practical approach to screen for dementia risk. Early identification of patients with frailty can help in the implementation of interventions aimed at preventing or delaying dementia.

Responsibilities and Interests of Pediatricians Practicing Hospital Medicine in the United States

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In 2016, the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) approved pediatric hospital medicine (PHM) as the newest pediatric subspecialty. To characterize development of the field, this article aims to: (1) describe the responsibilities and practice settings of US pediatricians self-identifying as hospitalists; and (2) determine how exclusive PHM practice, compared with PHM practice in combination with general or subspecialty care, was associated with professional development interests. METHODS: Pediatricians enrolling in the 2017-2018 American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) Maintenance of Certification program were offered a voluntary survey about their responsibilities, interests, and practice settings. Logistic regression was employed to characterize associations between exclusive PHM practice and: (1) interest in quality improvement (QI) leadership; (2) intention to take the PHM certifying exam; (3) satisfaction with allocation of professional time; and (4) intention to maintain more than one ABP certification. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 70.0%; 1662 (13.1%) self-reported PHM practice. Four hundred ninety-one (29.5%) practiced PHM exclusively, 518 (31.1%) practiced PHM and general pediatrics, and 653 (39.3%) practiced PHM and one or more subspecialties. Respondents reporting exclusive PHM practice were significantly more likely to report interest in QI leadership or consultation (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.39; 95% CI, 1.09-1.79), PHM exam certification (adjusted OR, 7.10; 95% CI, 5.45-9.25), and maintenance of more than one ABP certification (adjusted OR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.89-3.68). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalists reported diverse clinical and nonclinical responsibilities. Those practicing PHM exclusively expressed high levels of interest in board certification and QI leadership. Ongoing monitoring of PHM responsibilities and practice settings will be important to support the professional development of the PHM workforce.

Utilizing Telesimulation for Advanced Skills Training in Consultation and Handoff Communication: A Post-COVID-19 GME Bootcamp Experience

COVID-19 forced the switch to virtual for many educational strategies, including simulation. Virtual formats have the potential to broaden access to simulation training, especially in resource-heavy “bootcamp”-type settings. We converted our in-person communication skills bootcamp to telesimulation and compared effectiveness and satisfaction between formats. During June 2020 orientation, 130 entering interns at one institution participated, using Zoom® to perform one mock consultation and three mock handoffs. Faculty rated performance with checklists and gave feedback. Post-bootcamp surveys assessed participant satisfaction and practice preparedness. Telesimulation performance was comparable to in-person for consultations and slightly inferior for handoffs. Survey response rate was 100%. Compared to in-person, there was higher satisfaction with telesimulation, and interns felt more prepared for practice (95% vs 78%, P < .01); 99% recommended the experience. Fifty percent fewer faculty were required for implementation. Telesimulation was well-received and comparable to in-person bootcamp, representing a feasible, scalable training strategy for communication skills essential in hospital medicine.

Canadian demand and access to corneal transplantation: a provincial comparison

To gather information from stakeholders involved in corneal donation and transplantation to inform discussion at the “National Consensus Forum on Improving Cornea Donation and Transplantation Access in Canada” held in February 2020, survey questions were posed to eye banks, transplanting ophthalmologists and organ donation organizations across Canada to learn more about demand, wait times, and access to tissue for transplant. The survey response rate was one hundred percent (100%) for eye banks and organ donation organizations while 64 percent (64%) of transplant ophthalmologists provided feedback. A number of opportunities for improvement were identified including: demand forecasting; infrastructure and strategies to align supply with demand; data collection and benchmarking of wait times for assessment and transplant to support consistency, equitability and transparency in access; and national collaboration in the development of a data strategy to accurately measure demand and access to cornea transplants in a consistent manner across all provinces to facilitate equity in access nationally.

Maternity Care Tracks at US Family Medicine Residency Programs

Background and Objectives: The number of family physicians providing maternity care continues to decline, jeopardizing access to needed care for underserved populations. Accreditation changes in 2014 provided an opportunity to create family medicine residency maternity care tracks, providing comprehensive maternity care training only for interested residents. We examined the relationship between maternity care tracks and residents’ educational experiences and postgraduate practice. Methods: We included questions on maternity care tracks in an omnibus survey of family medicine residency program directors (PDs). We divided respondent programs into three categories: “Track,” “No Track Needed,” and “No Track.” We compared these program types by their characteristics, number of resident deliveries, and number of graduates practicing maternity care. Results: The survey response rate was 40%. Of the responding PDs, 79 (32%) represented Track programs, 55 (22%) No Track Needed programs, and 94 (38%) No Track programs. Residents in a track attended more deliveries than those not in a track (at Track programs) and those at No Track Needed and No Track programs. No Track Needed programs reported the highest proportion of graduates accepting positions providing inpatient maternity care in 2019 (21%), followed by Track programs (17%) and No Track programs (5%; P&lt;.001). Conclusions: Where universal robust maternity care education is not feasible, maternity care tracks are an excellent alternative to provide maternity care training and produce graduates who will practice maternity care. Programs that cannot offer adequate experience to achieve competence in inpatient maternity care may consider instituting a maternity care track.

Leprosy chemoprophylaxis of household contacts: A survey of Canadian infectious disease and tropical medicine specialists

BACKGROUND: Leprosy is uncommon in Canada. However, immigration from leprosy-endemic areas has introduced the infection to a Canadian context in which most doctors have little knowledge of the disease. Although post-exposure chemoprophylaxis (PEP) is reported to decrease leprosy transmission, no Canadian guidelines advise clinical decision making about leprosy PEP. Here, we characterize the practice patterns of Canadian infectious disease specialists with respect to leprosy PEP and screening of household contacts by yearly physical examinations. METHODS: Canadian infectious disease specialists with known experience treating leprosy were identified using university faculty lists. An online anonymous survey was distributed. Certain questions allowed more than one response. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 46.5% (20/43). Thirty-five percent responded that PEP is needed for household contacts, 40.0% responded that PEP is not needed for household contacts, and 25.0% did not know whether PEP is needed (multinomial test p = 0.79). Twenty-five percent responded that PEP should be given to all household contacts, 62.5% responded that PEP should be given to contacts of multibacillary cases, and 25.0% responded that PEP should be given to contacts who are genetically related to the index case. For specialists who prescribe PEP, 57.1% use rifampicin, ofloxacin (levofloxacin), and minocycline; 14.3% prescribe single-dose rifampicin; and 28.6% prescribe multiple doses of rifampicin (multinomial test p = 0.11). In addition, 68.4% recommend yearly screening of household contacts, whereas 31.6% do not (multinomial test p = 0.17). CONCLUSION: Consensus among Canadian infectious diseases specialists is lacking regarding leprosy PEP and screening of household contacts.

Signalling Three-Way Intersections: Is Redundancy Better Than Only Mandatory or Prohibitory Signs?

At intersections, drivers need to infer which ways are allowed by interpreting mandatory and/or prohibitory traffic signs. Time and accuracy in this decision-making process are crucial factors to avoid accidents. Previous studies show that integrating information from prohibitory signs is generally more difficult than from mandatory signs. In Study 1, we compare combined redundant signalling conditions to simple sign conditions at three-way intersections. In Study 2, we carried out a survey among professionals responsible for signposting to test whether common practices are consistent with experimental research. In Study 1, an experimental task was applied (n=24), and in Study 2, the survey response rate was 17%. These included the main cities in Spain such as Madrid and Barcelona. Study 1 showed that inferences with mandatory signs are faster than those with prohibitory signs, and redundant information is an improvement only on prohibitory signs. In Study 2, prohibitory signs were those most frequently chosen by professionals responsible for signposting. In conclusion, the most used signs, according to the laboratory study, were not the best ones for signposting because the faster responses were obtained for mandatory signs, and in second place for redundant signs.

Impact of COVID-19 on Endoscopy Training: Perspectives from a Global Survey of Program Directors and Endoscopy Trainers

Background/Aims: The coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted the training of medical trainees internationally. The aim of this study was to assess the global impact of COVID-19 on endoscopy training from the perspective of endoscopy trainers and to identify strategies implemented to mitigate the impact on trainee education.Methods: Teaching faculty of gastroenterology (GI) training programs globally were invited to complete a 36-question web-based survey to report the characteristics of their training programs and the impact of COVID-19 on various aspects of endoscopy training, including what factors decisions were based on.Results: The survey response rate was 52.6% (305 out of 580 individuals); 92.8% reported a negative impact on endoscopy training, with suspension of elective procedures (77.1%) being the most detrimental factor. Geographic variations were noted, with European programs reporting the lowest percentage of trainee participation in procedures. A higher proportion of trainees in the Americas were allowed to continue performing procedures, and trainers from the Americas reported receiving the greatest support for endoscopy teaching.Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant negative impact on GI endoscopy training internationally, as reported by endoscopy trainers. Focus-optimizing endoscopy training and assessment of competencies are necessary to ensure adequate endoscopy training.