BRD4 and PIN1 gene polymorphisms are associated with high pulse pressure risk in a southeastern Chinese population

Background BRD4 and PIN1 have been described to be involved in inflammation and vascular endothelial cell dysfunction, which in turn may increase pulse pressure. Hypothesis Genetic mutations within the BRD4 and PIN1 genes could affect the risk of high pulse pressure. Methods A total of four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (BRD4: rs4808278; PIN1: rs2233678, rs2287838, and rs2233682) were genotyped in a cohort of 666 hypertensive patients and 232 normotensive controls with Chinese Han origin. Generalized multifactor dimensionality reduction (GMDR) was used to screen the best interaction combination among the four SNPs within the BRD4 and PIN1 genes and diabetes. Logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate the odds ratio (ORs) (95% confidence interval (CI)) for the association between the four SNPs. Results Adjusted for age, weight, waist circumference, drinking, smoking, hypertension, and diabetes, high pulse pressure risk was significantly higher for carriers with the rs4808278-TT genotype in BRD4 than those with wild genotypes (OR: 0.400, 95% CI: 0.217–0.737, P* < 0.05). However, we did not find any significant association of rs2233678, rs2287838, and rs2233682 in PIN1 with high pulse pressure susceptibility after covariate adjustment. GMDR analysis indicated a significant three-locus model (P = 0.0107) involving rs4808278, rs2233678, and diabetes, the cross-validation consistency of the three-locus models was 9/10, and the testing accuracy was 57.47%. Conclusions Genetic mutations within BRD4 (rs4808278) could affect the susceptibility to high pulse pressure in a southeastern Chinese population.

Higher pulse pressure and risk for cardiovascular events in patients with essential hypertension: The Campania Salute Network

Background Increased pulse pressure is associated with structural target organ damage, especially in elderly patients, increasing cardiovascular risk. Design In this analysis, we investigated whether high pulse pressure retains a prognostic effect also when common markers of target organ damage are taken into account. Methods We analysed an unselected cohort of treated hypertensive patients from the Campania Salute Network registry ( n = 7336). Participants with available cardiac and carotid ultrasound were required to be free of prevalent cardiovascular disease, with ejection fraction ≥50%, and no more than stage III Chronic Kidney Disease. The median follow-up was 41 months and end-point was occurrence of major cardiovascular events (i.e. fatal and non-fatal stroke or myocardial infarction and sudden death). Based on current guidelines, pulse pressure ≥60 mm Hg was classified as high pulse pressure ( n = 2356), at the time of the initial visit, whereas pulse pressure <60 mm Hg was considered normal ( n = 4980). Results High pulse pressure patients were older, more likely to be women and diabetic, while receiving more antihypertensive medications than normal pulse pressure (all p < 0.0001). High pulse pressure exhibited greater prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy, and carotid plaque than normal pulse pressure (all p < 0.0001). In Cox regression, high pulse pressure patients had 57% increased hazard of major cardiovascular events, compared to normal pulse pressure (hazard ratio = 1.57; 95% confidence interval: 1.12–2.22, p = 0.01), an effect that was independent of significant prognostic impact of older age, male sex, diabetes, left ventricular hypertrophy, carotid plaque and less prescription of anti-renin–angiotensin system therapy. Conclusions High pulse pressure is a functional marker of target organ damage, predicting cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients, even independently of well-known structural markers of target organ damage.