bone putty
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

8
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

2
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (10) ◽  
pp. S109
Author(s):  
V Vasanthan ◽  
A Fatehi Hassanabad ◽  
S Kang ◽  
D Ramadan ◽  
D Holloway ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 591-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naili Zhang ◽  
Lina Ma ◽  
Xiaowei Liu ◽  
Xiaorui Jiang ◽  
Zhenhai Yu ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-67
Author(s):  
Yong-Xiong Pan ◽  
Guang-Gang Yang ◽  
Zhong-Wan Li ◽  
Zhong-Min Shi ◽  
Zhan-Dong Sun

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akshay Kumarswamy ◽  
Antonio Moretti ◽  
David Paquette ◽  
Ricardo Padilla ◽  
Eric Everett ◽  
...  

Objective. This preclinical pilot study evaluated the systemic, radiographic, and histological responses to bone putty containing lidocaine in a canine tooth extraction model.Methods. In five beagle dogs the right mandibular premolars were extracted and sockets grafted with (1) xenograft particulate bone and a collagen sponge plug (control), (2) bone putty alone, (3) bone putty mixed with xenograft (3 : 1), or (4) xenograft sandwiched between bone putty. At 6 weeks post-op, the systemic and local responses were evaluated using a blood chemistry panel, micro-CT, and histological analyses.Results. No significant differences in blood chemistries were noted at 6 weeks postgrafting compared to baseline. Sockets grafted with either bone putty formulation demonstrated comparable radiographic and histologic evidence of bone healing compared to control sockets.Conclusions. Our preclinical results indicate that this bone putty appears to be a safe biocompatible device that may be useful in the postoperative management of tooth extractions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document