dichtung und wahrheit
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

124
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

2
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Angus Nicholls

The term daemonic—often substantivized in German as the daemonic (das Dämonische) since its use by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe in the early 19th century—is a literary topos associated with divine inspiration and the idea of genius, with the nexus between character and fate and, in more orthodox Christian manifestations, with moral transgression and evil. Although strictly modern literary uses of the term have become prominent only since Goethe, its origins lie in the classical idea of the δαíμων, transliterated into English as daimon or daemon, as an intermediary between the earthly and the divine. This notion can be found in pre-Socratic thinkers such as Empedocles and Heraclitus, in Plato, and in various Stoic and Neo-Platonic sources. One influential aspect of Plato’s presentation of the daemonic is found in Socrates’s daimonion: a divine sign, voice, or hint that dissuades Socrates from taking certain actions at crucial moments in his life. Another is the notion that every soul contains an element of divinity—known as its daimon—that leads it toward heavenly truth. Already in Roman thought, this idea of an external voice or sign begins to be associated with an internal genius that belongs to the individual. In Christian thinking of the European romantic period, the daemonic in general and the Socratic daimonion in particular are associated with notions such as non-rational divine inspiration (for example, in Johann Georg Hamann and Johann Gottfried Herder) and with divine providence (for example, in Joseph Priestley). At the same time, the daemonic is also often interpreted as evil or Satanic—that is: as demonic—by European authors writing in a Christian context. In Russia in particular, during a period spanning from the mid-19th century until the early 20th century, there is a rich vein of novels, including works by Gogol and Dostoevsky, that deal with this more strictly Christian sense of the demonic, especially the notion that the author/narrator may be a heretical figure who supplants the primacy of God’s creation. But the main focus of this article is the more richly ambivalent notion of the daemonic, which explicitly combines both the Greco-Roman and Judeo-Christian heritages of the term. This topos is most prominently mobilized by two literary exponents during the 19th century: Goethe, especially in his autobiography Dichtung und Wahrheit (Poetry and Truth), and Samuel Taylor Coleridge, in his Notebooks and in the Lectures on the History of Philosophy. Both Goethe’s and Coleridge’s treatments of the term, alongside its classical and Judeo-Christian heritages, exerted an influence upon literary theory of the 20th century, leading important theorists such as Georg Lukács, Walter Benjamin, Hans Blumenberg, Angus Fletcher, and Harold Bloom to associate the daemonic with questions concerning the novel, myth, irony, allegory, and literary influence.


2021 ◽  

Art and literature are seismographs: they sense changes. And often they are ahead of their time and anticipate new truths. This volume attempts to show the significance of such artistic advances in knowledge and perception for the study of law by means of examples. The articles by nine authors collected here range from an introduction to the thematic connection of poetry, truth and law to an analysis of works of William Shakespeare, Charles Reade, Alexander Vasilyevich Sukhovo-Kobylin, George Orwell, Peter Kurczek, Ingeborg Bachmann, an excerpt from the novel "Justizpalast" by Petra Morsbach and a study on the TV crime series „Tatort“.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin Schutjer

Lektüren über das Spannungsverhältnis der jüdischen Wurzeln im Werk und Denken Goethes. Karin Schutjer untersucht Goethes ambivalente Auseinandersetzung mit dem Judentum von der Beobachtung aus, dass sie seinen ebenfalls zwiespältigen Modernebegriff zutiefst beeinflusste. Ihre Studie kontextualisiert Goethes Rezeption der jüdischen Schrifttradition und hinterfragt die Spuren, die sowohl der Pentateuch, die Kabbala und Spinoza als auch antijüdische Denkfiguren wie der Ewige oder der wandernde Jude in seinem Werk hinterlassen haben. Schutjers Lektüren von »Dichtung und Wahrheit«, »Hermann und Dorothea«, »Wilhelm Meisters Wanderjahren«, »Faust« und Goethes Volksbuch-Projekt bringen aufschlussreiche Erkenntnisse zutage, die Goethes Kritik an der jüdischen Emanzipationsbewegung überraschend in ein neues Licht rücken, wenn beispielsweise Faust als Moses-Figur gelesen wird, sich Goethes Semiotik aus dem jüdischen Verbot des Götzendienstes speist oder das Alte Testament vor dem Hintergrund der jüdischen Exilgeschichte als säkulare Nationalliteratur gedeutet wird, die Goethe als Vorbild für eine diasporische schriftbezogene deutsche Kulturnation verstand.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-38
Author(s):  
Veronika Tocha

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749-1832) sah etwas "Fremdartiges, ja völlig Unwahres" im Medium der Totenmaske. Überhaupt schien ihm der Tod "ein sehr mittelmäßiger Porträtmaler", weshalb er sich nicht nur gegen die Abnahme seiner eigenen Totenmaske aussprach, sondern es auch ablehnte die Totenmasken seiner Freunde zu betrachten. Mit dieser Haltung nimmt Goethe im Kontext seiner Zeit eine Ausnahmestellung ein, waren Totenmasken von öffentlichen Persönlichkeiten und Geistesgrößen aller Art ab dem frühen 19. Jahrhundert doch höchst populär und wurde die Abformung des Totengesichts gerade deshalb praktiziert, weil sie - so der damalige Konsens - wie kein anderes bildgebendes Verfahren Realitätsnähe und Wahrheit verbürgte.


Author(s):  
Matthias Grüne

Abstract In the second and third parts of Dichtung und Wahrheit (From My Life: Poetry and Truth), Johann Wolfgang von Goethe portrays his liaison with Friederike Brion, a daughter of a pastor in the Alsatian town Sesenheim (as spelled in Goethe’s writing, actually: Sessenheim). Although the text was published 40 years after the events, and even though Goethe’s depiction is noticeably fictional, enthusiastic readers subsequently travelled to the real venues of the narrative in order to search for hidden traces of the love affair. In fact, the unclear status of truthfulness and accuracy of the narrative, as well as the distance in time, seem to have further stimulated the readers in their endeavor. This cultural tourism results in autobiographical (August Ferdinand Näke), fictional (Ludwig Tieck), and auto-fictional (Johann Christoph Freieisen) travel stories. In these texts, as this article will show, past events are not only uncovered and examined for conservatory purposes. Additionally, for one, the performative reenactment and literary adaption of Goethe’s idealistic and idyllic love story serves to preserve and uphold a certain image of the writer in these texts and to defend this image against alternative reception perspectives. For another, these appropriations of Goethe’s biographical episode articulate distinct and new concepts of individuality and identity. These texts of the so-called “Friederiken-Literatur” (‘Friederike Literature’) have significantly shaped the perception of Goethe’s text ever since.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document