growth implants
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

19
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

7
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Vol 238 ◽  
pp. 104039
Author(s):  
Jase J. Ball ◽  
Elizabeth B. Kegley ◽  
John T. Richeson ◽  
Matt P. Rowe ◽  
Jeremy G. Powell

Author(s):  
В.П. Хвостиков ◽  
В.С. Калиновский ◽  
С.В. Сорокина ◽  
О.А. Хвостикова ◽  
В.М. Андреев

We report on the development of a radioisotope power source based on the AlхGaAs1-х/GaAs semiconductor converter of β-radiation and tritium as a radiation source. The transducer efficiencies are compared for three types of β-radiation sources: (i) the tritiated titanium disk, (ii) the tritium lamp of green luminescent glow, and (iii) gaseous tritium. When using a converter based on the Al0.35Ga0.65As/GaAs heterostructure in a tritium capsule, the efficiency η = 5.9% is found with the maximum output specific electric power of 0.56 µW/cm2. Due to the prolonged operational life, such autonomous and compact power sources can be utilized in space technology, underwater systems, growth implants, biomedical sensors, and portable mobile equipment of high realibility.


2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (7) ◽  
pp. 360-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong-Woon Shin ◽  
Samir K. Trehan ◽  
Tyler J. Uppstrom ◽  
Roger F. Widmann ◽  
Daniel W. Green

Author(s):  
S. S. Trehal ◽  
J. L. Talley ◽  
K. D. Sherrill ◽  
T. Spore ◽  
R. N. Wahl ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 95 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 39-39
Author(s):  
J. J. Ball ◽  
M. C. Hickinbotham ◽  
E. B. Kegley ◽  
J. T. Richeson ◽  
M. P. Rowe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. R. Niemann ◽  
D. R. George ◽  
L. W. Greene ◽  
N. A. Cole ◽  
F. T. McCollum and N. K. Chirase

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamal Jamil ◽  
A.H. Abdul Rashid ◽  
Sharaf Ibrahim

2013 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 171-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Óscar López-Campos ◽  
Jennifer L. Aalhus ◽  
Erasmus K. Okine ◽  
Vern S. Baron ◽  
John A. Basarab

López-Campos, Ó., Aalhus, J. L., Okine, E. K., Baron, V. S. and Basarab, J. A. 2013. Effects of calf- and yearling-fed beef production systems and growth promotants on production and profitability. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 93: 171–184. In each of 2 yr, 112 spring-born steers were used to evaluate the effect of calf-fed vs. yearling-fed with and without growth implant and β-adrenergic agonist on production parameters and economic potential. Steers were grouped into: (1) non-implanted feeders harvested at 11–14 mo of age, (2) growth implanted feeders harvested at 11–14 mo of age, (3) non-implanted feeders harvested at 19–23 mo of age, and (4) growth implanted feeders harvested at 19–23 mo of age. Production data were collected and economic evaluation was performed. Calf-fed steers grew slower (1.21 vs. 1.99±0.07 kg d−1) and had a poorer feed conversion ratio [5.32 vs. 4.99±0.34 kg dry matter intake (DMI) kg−1 gain] during the feedlot dietary adjustment period than yearling-fed. Calf-fed steers were more efficient than yearling-fed during the first 76–83 d (5.16 vs. 7.33±0.11 kg DMI kg−1 gain) and latter 48–79 d (5.69 vs. 14.28±1.50 kg DMI kg−1 gain) of the finishing period. Implanted steers were more efficient than non-implanted during the dietary feedlot adjustment period (4.80 vs. 5.52±0.15 kg DMI kg−1 gain), and during the first 76–83 d (6.05 vs. 6.44±0.11 kg DMI kg−1 gain) and latter 48–79 d of the finishing period (9.29 vs. 10.69±1.50 kg DMI kg−1 gain). Implanted steers grew 11.4–19.6% faster than non-implanted throughout the finishing period, while yearling-fed grew 11.1–12.9% faster during the first 76–83 d, but 49.1–64.4% slower during the last 48–79 d of the finishing period compared with calf-fed. Quality grade was improved for non-implanted steers, with 43.6% of yearling-fed and 35.7% calf-fed steers grading AAA. Adjusted net return was best for calf-fed implanted ($17.52 head−1), followed by calf-fed non-implanted ($−41.92 head−1), yearling-fed implanted ($−73.77 head−1), and yearling-fed non-implanted ($−99.65 head−1) production strategies. The results of the present study suggest that reducing age at slaughter combined with growth implant can increase profit and reduce risk, but growth implants can negatively affect the carcass quality.


2013 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michał Latalski ◽  
Marek Fatyga ◽  
Martin Repko ◽  
Milan Filipovič

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document