reinforcement delay
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

38
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

13
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 464-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond C. Pitts ◽  
Craig W. Cummings ◽  
Carol Cummings ◽  
Rebecca L. Woodcock ◽  
Christine E. Hughes

Author(s):  
Minji Kang ◽  
Kyehoon Lee ◽  
Shezeen Oah

This study examined the effects of reinforcement delay and rule explicitness on performance. A 2 (immediate vs. delayed reinforcement) x 2 (explicit vs. implicit rule) factorial design was used. Eighty college students were recruited as participants and were randomly assigned to the four experimental groups. They performed a simulated work task and the dependent variable was the number of the work task correctly completed. Results indicated that in the delayed reinforcement condition, performance for the group who was given an explicit rule was higher than that for the group who was given an implicit rule. In the immediate reinforcement condition, however, performance for both groups was comparable.


2011 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael E. Kelley ◽  
Dorothea C. Lerman ◽  
Wayne W. Fisher ◽  
Henry S. Roane ◽  
Amanda N. Zangrillo

2010 ◽  
Vol 100 (5) ◽  
pp. 438-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonard H. Epstein ◽  
Sarah J. Salvy ◽  
Katelyn A. Carr ◽  
Kelly K. Dearing ◽  
Warren K. Bickel

2008 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Min TA ◽  
Raymond C. Pitts ◽  
Christine E. Hughes ◽  
Anthony P. McLean ◽  
Randolph C. Grace

Sex Roles ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 20 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 551-573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Ervin Cramer ◽  
David J. Lutz ◽  
Patricia A. Bartell ◽  
Marguerite Dragna ◽  
Kimberly Helzer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document