benefit valuation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

18
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

7
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. e3219
Author(s):  
Luis Loría Rebolledo

Cost Benefit Analyses can be useful tools for the appraisal of infrastructure projects and policies. The literature and guidance documents on the application of the CBA methodology are extensive. Moreover, the vast majority of this literature is focused on applications in upper and upper-middle countries (developed nations). This paper adds to this literature by exploring the issues of undertaking a benefit valuation exercise, as part of a CBA, in the context of developing nations. It provides an overview of the different methodologies to value benefits and offers guidance on some of the issues that may arise when such methodologies are implemented in a developing nation. This paper also offers general guidance to ensure a benefit valuation exercise provides a helpful tool to appraise a project in the context of a developing nation.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yassmin Ali ◽  
Pablo Sota ◽  
Ming Taylor ◽  
Stephen Michael Taylor ◽  
Xun Wang

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akira Masuda ◽  
Chie Sano ◽  
Thomas J. McHugh ◽  
Shigeyoshi Fujisawa ◽  
Shigeyoshi Itohara

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel E. Forster ◽  
Eric J. Pedersen ◽  
Adam Smith ◽  
Michael E. McCullough ◽  
Debra Lieberman
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 44-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jost Wilker ◽  
Karsten Rusche ◽  
Alexander Benning ◽  
Michael A. MacDonald ◽  
Phillip Blaen

2015 ◽  
Vol 533 ◽  
pp. 156-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boris Galvis ◽  
Michael Bergin ◽  
James Boylan ◽  
Yan Huang ◽  
Michelle Bergin ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard D. Smith ◽  
Tracey H. Sach

AbstractContingent valuation (CV) has been argued to have theoretical advantages over other approaches for benefit valuation used by health economists. Yet, in reality, the technique appears not to have realised these advantages when applied to health-care issues, such that its influence in decision-making at national levels has been non-existent within the health sector. This is not a result of a lack of methodological work in the area, which has continued to flourish. Rather, it is a result of such activities being undertaken in a rather uncoordinated and unsystematic fashion, leading CV to be akin to a ‘ship without a sail’. This paper utilises a systematic review of the CV literature in health to illustrate some important points concerning the conduct of CV studies, before providing a comment on what the remaining policy and research priorities are for the technique, and proposing a guideline for such studies. It is hoped that this will initiate some wider and rigorous debate on the future of the CV technique in order to make it seaworthy, give it direction and provide the right momentum.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document