equivalent input noise
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

28
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Ga-Young Kim ◽  
Jong Sei Kim ◽  
Mini Jo ◽  
Hye Yoon Seol ◽  
Young Sang Cho ◽  
...  

Objectives: To confirm the feasibility of personal sound amplification products (PSAPs), the study was conducted for three purposes: 1) to investigate electroacoustic characteristics of PSAPs, 2) to identify whether PSAPs provide adequate gain and output for three common hearing loss configurations, and 3) to compare the benefit of one representative PSAP (RPSAP) to a conventional hearing aid (HA) based on clinical hearing outcomes as a pilot study.Methods: The study consisted of three phases: electroacoustic analysis, simulated real-ear measurements (REMs), and clinical hearing experiments. Electroacoustic analysis and simulated REMs were performed in three basic (BeethoSOL, EarJJang, and Geniesori2) and three high-end PSAPs (Hearing Able, Olive Smart Ear, and SoriIn) using the Aurical Hearing Instrument Test box with a 2cc coupler. With regards to electroacoustic analysis, four electroacoustic characteristics (maximum output sound pressure level at 90 dB SPL, frequency range, equivalent input noise, and total harmonic distortion) were investigated. By simulated REMs, the appropriate level of the six PSAPs for three common hearing loss configurations (mild-to-moderate high-frequency hearing loss, moderate to moderately severe sloping hearing loss, and moderate flat hearing loss) was determined. Clinical experiments were carried out for the purpose of comparing the performance of RPSAP to HA. Before conducting clinical experiments, both RPSAP and HA were fitted by audiologists using REMs. Clinical experiments were administered using functional gain, a word recognition test, and the Korean version of the Hearing in Noise Test in six participants with bilateral moderate sensorineural hearing loss. Results: With regards to electroacoustic analysis, two high-end devices met all tolerances. In the case of simulated REMs, one basic and two high-end PSAPs showed appropriate level for three common hearing loss configurations. As for the clinical experiments, the RPSAP showed better performances than unaided, but slightly worse than HA under all test conditions.Conclusion: Our results demonstrated that certain PSAPs met all specified tolerances for electroacoustic analysis and had ability to approximate prescriptive targets in a well-controlled laboratory condition. The pilot clinical experiments explored the possibility that RPSAP could be served as a hearing assistive device for patients with moderate hearing loss.


2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (08) ◽  
pp. 1750070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiqiang Gao ◽  
Bo Luan ◽  
Jincai Zhao ◽  
Xiaowei Liu

In this paper, a very low 1/f noise integrated Wheatstone bridge magnetoresistive sensor ASIC based on magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ) technology is presented for high sensitivity measurements. The present CMOS instrumentation amplifier employs the gain-boost folded-cascode structure based on the capacitive-feedback chopper-stabilized technique. By chopping both the input and the output of the amplifier, combined with MTJ magnetoresistive sensitive elements, a noise equivalent magnetoresistance 1 nT/Hz[Formula: see text] at 2 Hz, the equivalent input noise spectral density 17 nV/Hz[Formula: see text](@2Hz) is achieved. The chip-scale package of the TMR sensor and the instrumentation amplifier is only about 5 mm × 5 mm × 1 mm, while the whole DC current dissipates only 2 mA.


2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (04) ◽  
pp. 1750030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiangyu Li ◽  
Liang Yin ◽  
Weiping Chen ◽  
Zhiqiang Gao ◽  
Xiaowei Liu

In this paper, a chopper instrumentation amplifier and a high-precision and low-noise CMOS band gap reference in a standard 0.5 [Formula: see text] CMOS technology for a tunneling magneto-resistance (TMR) sensor is presented. The noise characteristic of TMR sensor is an important factor in determining the performance of the sensor. In order to obtain a larger signal to noise ratio (SNR), the analog front-end chip ASIC weak signal readout circuit of the sensor includes the chopper instrumentation amplifier; the high-precision and low-noise CMOS band gap reference. In order to achieve the low noise, the chopping technique is applied in the first stage amplifier. The low-frequency flicker noise is modulated to high-frequency by chopping switch, so that the modulator has a better noise suppression performance at the low frequency. The test results of interface circuit are shown as below: At a single 5 V supply, the power dissipation is 40 mW; the equivalent offset voltage is less than 10 uV; the equivalent input noise spectral density 30 nV/Hz[Formula: see text](@10 Hz), the equivalent input noise density of magnetic is 0.03 nTHz[Formula: see text](@10 Hz); the scale factor temperature coefficient is less than 10 ppm/[Formula: see text]C, the equivalent input offset temperature coefficient is less than 70 nV/[Formula: see text]C; the gain error is less than 0.05%, the common mode rejection ratio is greater than 120 dB, the power supply rejection ratio is greater than 115 dB; the nonlinear is 0.1% FS.


2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (08) ◽  
pp. 619-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jourdan T. Holder ◽  
Erin M. Picou ◽  
Jill M. Gruenwald ◽  
Todd A. Ricketts

Background: The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) provides standards used to govern standardization of all hearing aids. If hearing aids do not meet specifications, there are potential negative implications for hearing aid users, professionals, and the industry. Recent literature has not investigated the proportion of new hearing aids in compliance with the ANSI specifications for quality control standards when they arrive in the clinic before dispensing. Purpose: The aims of this study were to determine the percentage of new hearing aids compliant with the relevant ANSI standard and to report trends in electroacoustic analysis data. Research Design: New hearing aids were evaluated for quality control via the ANSI S3.22-2009 standard. In addition, quality control of directional processing was also assessed. Study Sample: Seventy-three behind-the-ear hearing aids from four major manufacturers, that were purchased for clinical patients were evaluated before dispensing. Data Collection and Analysis: Audioscan Verifit (version 3.1) hearing instrument fitting system was used to complete electroacoustic analysis and directional processing evaluation of the hearing aids. Frye’s Fonix 8000 test box system (Fonix 8000) was also used to cross-check equivalent input noise (EIN) measurements. These measurements were then analyzed for trends across brands and specifications. Results: All of the hearing aids evaluated were found to be out of specification for at least one measure. EIN and attack and release times were the measures most frequently out of specification. EIN was found to be affected by test box isolation for two of the four brands tested. Systematic discrepancies accounted for ˜93% of the noncompliance issues, while unsystematic quality control issues accounted for the remaining 7%. Conclusions: The high number of systematic discrepancies between the data collected and the specifications published by the manufacturers suggests there are clear issues related to the specific protocols used for quality control testing. These issues present a significant barrier for hearing aid dispensers when attempting to accurately determine if a hearing aid is functioning appropriately. The significant number of unsystematic discrepancies supports the continued importance of quality control measures of new and repaired hearing aids to ensure that the device is functioning properly before it is dispensed and to avoid future negative implications of fitting a faulty device.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoe Yee Ting Chan ◽  
Bradley McPherson

Background. Hearing aids sold directly to consumers in retail stores or through the internet, without individual prescription by audiological professionals, are termed over-the-counter (OTC) devices. This study aimed to determine whether there was any change in the electroacoustic characteristics of OTC devices compared to research carried out a decade earlier. The previous results indicated that most OTC devices were low-frequency-emphasis devices and were unsuitable for elderly people with presbycusis, who were likely to be the major consumers of these products.Methods. Ten OTC devices were selected and their electroacoustic performance was measured. Appropriate clients for the OTC devices were derived, using four linear prescription formulae, and OTC suitability for elderly persons with presbycusis was investigated.Results. OTC electroacoustic characteristics were similar to those in the earlier study. Most OTC devices were not acoustically appropriate for potential consumers with presbycusis. Although several of the devices could match prescriptive targets for individuals with presbycusis, their poor electroacoustic performance—including ineffective volume control function, high equivalent input noise, and irregular frequency response—may override their potential benefit.Conclusion. The low-cost OTC devices were generally not suitable for the main consumers of these products, and there has been little improvement in the appropriateness of these devices over the past decade.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document