privacy standard
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

11
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

2
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 5543-5549
Author(s):  
N. SangeethaPriya ◽  
L. Bharathi ◽  
S. Dola Sanjay ◽  
N. V. D. P. Murthy ◽  
A. N. L. Harisha

Generally wireless sensor networks (WSN) are connected via a wireless medium to form a large amount of cooperative sensor nodes. Monitoring control is an important aspect of monitoring users in monitoring applications, such as wireless sensor networks, because of security. There are countless applications to pay for themselves but at the same time, their special properties offer a number of challenges, such as security and surveillance, control, and operation and complex system maintenance. WSN has already seen it on the Internet, from face-to-face security attacks. To propose an Optimal Multilevel Link extend umpiring routing (OML-EUR) based secure routing protocol for improving privacy standard in wireless sensor networks. Secure communication is also important in providing accurate and resource constraints at the sensor node at the moment. In this study, there are three of our contributions. Initially it monitors the neighbor network layer attacks for browsing the WSN on the transmission medium. Followed subscription a link establishment to monitoring the request packets through key transmission of WSN with secure routing protocols. By finding the secure communication as qualities of service verification among the modes to authenticate to transfer. The proposed system produce high secure performance by the result proves energy consumption and communication overhead as higher efficient than previous system.


2020 ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Evan Caminker

Professor Jeffrey Bellin’s excellent article advances a comprehensive and straightforward textual approach to determining what policing activities constitute “searches” triggering the protections of the Fourth Amendment. Bellin’s thesis is that a text-based approach to interpreting the Amendment is superior to the Supreme Court’s current approach, which ever since Katz v. United States has defined “search” primarily by reference to a non-textual “reasonable expectation of privacy” standard. After soundly criticizing the ungrounded and highly subjective nature of the Katz test, Bellin declares that the Court should instead simply follow where the text leads: the Amendment protects people from a search, meaning an “examination of an object or space to uncover information” of their own “persons, houses, papers, and effects.” No more, no less. Such a textual approach generates new doctrinal rules that would replicate Katz’s outcomes in many respects and provide either more or less protection in others.


The enormous amount of data process in distributed grid resource holds sensitive information on centralized access. The common privacy standard needs advancement to protect the sensitive data in various sectors like sharing, legal privacy and policies to access the data. The privacy standards depend the Distributed Data Mining (DDM) approaches like Association Rule Mining algorithms (ARM), clustering, and classification methods to preserve the data from unauthorized access. But the security standards have lacked privacy-preserving rules due to high dimensionality problems of data access leads more time complexity. To overcome the problem, to propose a Multiplicative Perturbation Swapping method based on Frequent Decision Classifier (MPS-FDC). This method is adaptive to data publishing secrecy to hold the privacy standards better than association rule prediction. This optimization resolves the forecasting leakages based on Persuasive Privacy Preserving Data Mining (P2PDM) to secure the data. Which this technique initially does the sanitization to reduce the dimensionality to remove un-variant the outliers. The data perturbation keeps the original data to modify using supportive noise delimiters with state matrix distortion (SMD). So the original data keep safe without effect from the outliers. The frequent rule prediction decides to classify the recurrentdata from unauthorized access to disclosing crypto- privacy policy. The proposed system improves the privacy standard compared to the ARM specification rules.


2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 220-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Klonoff ◽  
W. Nicholson Price

Privacy is an important concern for the Precision Medicine Initiative (PMI) because success of this initiative will require the public to be willing to participate by contributing large amounts of genetic/genomic information and sensor data. This sensitive personal information is intended to be used only for specified research purposes. Public willingness to participate will depend on the public’s level of trust that their information will be protected and kept private. Medical devices may constantly provide information. Therefore, assuring privacy for device-generated information may be essential for broad participation in the PMI. Privacy standards for devices should be an important early step in the development of the PMI.


Infosecurity ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. 6
Author(s):  
SA Mathieson
Keyword(s):  

AAOHN Journal ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 49 (11) ◽  
pp. 508-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine M. Kalina ◽  
B. Haag Annette ◽  
Mary Lou Wassel ◽  
Robin Tourigian

At the request of our readers, we present this special feature on case management. This feature appears on an occasional basis in the Journal. Based on the suggestion of a reader, we are using a Panel approach to provide a forum for sharing ideas, viewpoints, and perspectives. We have put together a group of individuals with expertise from a variety of case management arenas who have agreed to share their opinions and perspectives in response to specific questions or scenarios. Opinions and perspectives are those of the panel members, and do not necessarily represent the views of the AAOHN, the Editor, or the Publisher. We encourage readers to submit their questions or scenarios for the Panel. This month's Panel members include Christine M. Kalina, Annette B. Haag, Mary Lou Wassel, and Robin Tourigian. The question for this month's feature comes from the Case Management Section Meeting at AOHC 2001 in San Francisco.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document