Complexities in the role of acetylation dynamics in modifying inducible gene activation parameters

High levels of histone acetylation are associated with the regulatory elements of active genes, suggesting a link between acetylation and gene activation. However, several studies have shown that histone acetylation dynamics rather than hyperacetylation per se are important determinants in gene activation, particularly at inducible genes. We revisited this model, in the context of EGF-inducible gene expression and found that rather than a simple unifying model, there are two broad classes of genes; one in which high lysine acetylation activity is required for efficient gene activation, and a second group where the opposite occurs and high acetylation activity is inhibitory. We examined the latter class in more detail using EGR2 as a model gene and found that lysine acetylation levels are critical for several activation parameters, including the timing of expression onset, and overall amplitudes of the transcriptional response. In contrast, DUSP1 responds in the canonical manner and its transcriptional activity is promoted by acetylation. Single cell approaches demonstrate heterogenous DUSP1 activation kinetics and that acetylation levels influence allele activation frequencies. Our data therefore point to a complex interplay between acetylation dynamics and target gene induction, which cannot simply be explained by a unified response to acetylation activity. Instead, acetylation level thresholds are an important determinant of transcriptional induction dynamics that are sensed in a gene-specific manner.

Response to Nodal morphogen gradient is determined by the kinetics of target gene induction

Morphogen gradients expose cells to different signal concentrations and induce target genes with different ranges of expression. To determine how the Nodal morphogen gradient induces distinct gene expression patterns during zebrafish embryogenesis, we measured the activation dynamics of the signal transducer Smad2 and the expression kinetics of long- and short-range target genes. We found that threshold models based on ligand concentration are insufficient to predict the response of target genes. Instead, morphogen interpretation is shaped by the kinetics of target gene induction: the higher the rate of transcription and the earlier the onset of induction, the greater the spatial range of expression. Thus, the timing and magnitude of target gene expression can be used to modulate the range of expression and diversify the response to morphogen gradients.