microseismic event location
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

64
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

8
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denis Anikiev ◽  
Umair bin Waheed ◽  
František Staněk ◽  
Dmitry Alexandrov ◽  
Leo Eisner

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pingan Peng ◽  
Yuanjian Jiang ◽  
Liguan Wang ◽  
Zhengxiang He

The velocity model is a key factor that affects the accuracy of microseismic event location around tunnels. In this paper, we consider the effect of the empty area on the microseismic event location and present a 3D heterogeneous velocity model for excavated tunnels. The grid-based heterogeneous velocity model can describe a 3D arbitrarily complex velocity model, where the microseismic monitoring areas are divided into many blocks. The residual between the theoretical arrival time calculated by the fast marching method (FMM) and the observed arrival time is used to identify the block with the smallest residual. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) is used to improve the location accuracy in this block. Synthetic tests show that the accuracy of the microseismic event location based on the heterogeneous velocity model was higher than that based on the single velocity model, independent of whether an arrival time error was considered. We used the heterogeneous velocity model to locate 7 blasting events and 44 microseismic events with a good waveform quality in the Qinling No. 4 tunnel of the Yinhanjiwei project from 6 June 2017 to 13 June 2017 and compared the location results of the heterogeneous-velocity model with those of the single-velocity model. The results of this case study show that the events located by the heterogeneous velocity model were concentrated around the working face, which matched the actual conditions of the project, while the events located by the single-velocity model were scattered and far from the working face.


Geophysics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 84 (6) ◽  
pp. KS191-KS210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chengwei Zhang ◽  
Wenxiao Qiao ◽  
Xiaohua Che ◽  
Junqiang Lu ◽  
Baiyong Men

Without the need to pick the arrival times of P- and S-waves, migration-based location methods, such as semblance-based and amplitude-stacking-based location methods, are best applied to microseismic events. By comparing and analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of these two methods, we have developed a new location method using amplitude information and semblance. First, we use the two-point ray-tracing method to calculate the traveltime of body waves from the trial point to each receiver, which determines the time-window positions of the P- and S-waves on all traces. Then, we calculate the semblance of the waveforms and the amplitude stacking of the ratio between the short-time average and the long-time average is computed upon the original waveform over the windows. Finally, the semblance weighted by amplitude stacking is used to image the spatial location of the microseismic events. Using experimental and synthetic data considering different factors that may affect the location result (e.g., the signal-to-noise ratio of the waveforms, the scale of the observation array, and the horizontal and vertical distances from the source to fracture zones), we perform microseismic event location with all three methods. According to the source imaging results from experimental and synthetic tests, the semblance method has great location uncertainty in the radial direction but it has good constraints in the circumferential direction; the amplitude-stacking method exhibits the opposite result; and the weighted-semblance method has good constraints in the circumferential and radial directions because it inherits the advantages of semblance-based and amplitude-stacking-based methods. Therefore, compared with existing migration-based location methods, our weighted-semblance method indicates stronger stability and lower location uncertainty, even when downhole monitoring is conducted with a limited aperture of the receiver array.


2019 ◽  
Vol 174 ◽  
pp. 144-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meng Li ◽  
Huifeng Li ◽  
Guo Tao ◽  
Mohammed Ali ◽  
Yuhua Guo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document