perceptual span
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

103
(FIVE YEARS 5)

H-INDEX

24
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
pp. 026765832110497
Author(s):  
Leigh B Fernandez ◽  
Ricarda Bothe ◽  
Shanley EM Allen

In the current study we used the gaze-contingent moving window paradigm to directly compare the second language (L2) English perceptual span of two groups that speak languages with essentially the same lexicon and grammar but crucially with different writing directions (and scripts): Hindi (read left to right) and Urdu (read right to left). This is the first study to directly compare first language (L1) speakers of languages that differ primarily in reading direction in a common L2, English. While Urdu speakers had a slightly faster reading rate, we found no additional differences between Hindi and Urdu speakers when reading L2 English; both groups showed a perceptual span between 9 and 11 characters to the right of the fixation based on saccade length. This suggests little to no influence of L1 reading direction on L2 perceptual span, but rather that L2 perceptual span is influenced by allocation of attention during reading. Our data are in line with research by Leung et al. (2014) finding that L2 speakers have a smaller perceptual span than native speakers (L1 perceptual span is approximately 15 characters to the right of the fixation). This most likely stems from the increased demands associated with reading in a second language, which led to a reduction in the amount of attention that can be allocated outside of the current fixation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 182 ◽  
pp. 20-26
Author(s):  
Wei Zhou ◽  
Aiping Wang ◽  
Ming Yan

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 1026-1040
Author(s):  
Fang Xie ◽  
Jingxin Wang ◽  
Lisha Hao ◽  
Xue Zhang ◽  
Kayleigh L. Warrington

Author(s):  
Aiping Wang ◽  
Ming Yan ◽  
Bei Wang ◽  
Gaoding Jia ◽  
Albrecht W. Inhoff
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (8) ◽  
pp. 1189-1205
Author(s):  
Fang Xie ◽  
Victoria A McGowan ◽  
Min Chang ◽  
Lin Li ◽  
Sarah J White ◽  
...  

Older readers (aged 65+ years) of both alphabetic languages and character-based languages like Chinese read more slowly than their younger counterparts (aged 18–30 years). A possible explanation for this slowdown is that, due to age-related visual and cognitive declines, older readers have a smaller perceptual span and so acquire less information on each fixational pause. However, although aging effects on the perceptual span have been investigated for alphabetic languages, no such studies have been reported to date for character-based languages like Chinese. Accordingly, we investigated this issue in three experiments that used different gaze-contingent moving window paradigms to assess the perceptual span of young and older Chinese readers. In these experiments, text was shown either entirely as normal or normal only within a narrow region (window) comprising either the fixated word, the fixated word, and one word to its left, or the fixated word and either one or two words to its right. Characters outside these windows were replaced using a pattern mask (Experiment 1) or a visually similar character (Experiment 2), or blurred to render them unidentifiable (Experiment 3). Sentence reading times were overall longer for the older compared with the younger adults and differed systematically across display conditions. Crucially, however, the effects of display condition were essentially the same across the two age groups, indicating that the perceptual span for Chinese does not differ substantially for the older and young adults. We discuss these findings in relation to other evidence suggesting the perceptual span is preserved in older adulthood.


2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 520-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Yan ◽  
Hong Li ◽  
Yongqiang Su ◽  
Yuqing Cao ◽  
Jinger Pan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document