Development and validation of a pharmacokinetically based fixed dosing scheme for suramin.

PURPOSE We used population pharmacokinetic-parameter estimates and designed a fixed dosing schedule to maintain plasma suramin concentrations between 100 and 300 micrograms/mL and then evaluated its performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS On day 1, patients received a 200-mg test dose and 1,000-mg/m2 loading dose. On days 2, 3, 4, and 5, patients received 1-hour infusions of 400, 300, 250, and 200 mg/m2, respectively. Subsequent 1-hour infusions of 275 mg/m2 were given on days 8, 11, 15, 19, 22, 29, 36, 43, 50, 57, 67, and 78. Therapy was discontinued for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) or progressive disease (PD). Patients were to be removed from the fixed dosing schedule if, after day 5, three consecutive peak plasma suramin concentrations were greater than 300 micrograms/mL. RESULTS Forty-two patients, including 40 with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC), received 700 infusions. Forty patients were assessable for toxicity; 38 were assessable for response. Two patients with preexisting pulmonary disease died early of respiratory insufficiency. Treatment was discontinued in five patients due to DLT and in seven due to PD. No patient had treatment discontinued due to repeated peak plasma suramin concentrations > or = 300 micrograms/mL. The fixed dosing schedule was precise, unbiased, and well tolerated. DLT consisted of grade 4 nephrotoxicity (n = 2), neurotoxicity (n = 2), and corticosteroid-induced psychosis (n = 1). Three patients, who received all 18 doses of suramin per protocol, developed severe, but not dose-limiting, malaise, fatigue, and lethargy. Twenty-four of 36 assessable patients with elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels had a > or = 50% reduction, lasting more than 4 weeks, and 18 had a > or = 75% reduction, lasting more than 4 weeks. Twelve of 23 (52%) symptomatic HRPC patients noted a subjective improvement in pain. There were no measurable responses in four patients with measurable disease. The estimated median survival time in 38 assessable patients with HRPC was 18.8 months. The estimated median time to progression in 35 patients, for whom data were available, was 10.1 months. CONCLUSION This easily implemented schedule allowed suramin to be administered safely as an intermittent bolus injection. Toxicity was manageable and reversible.

Population Pharmacokinetics: Development of a Medical Intensive Care Unit-Specific Gentamicin Dosing Nomogram

Objective This study was designed to develop a population-specific dosing nomogram for gentamicin in medical intensive care unit (MICU) patients using the population pharmacokinetic program nonparametric expectation maximization (NPEM). Design Observational clinical gentamicin dosing data were collected, entered into the USC*PACK database program PASTRX, and downloaded into the population pharmacokinetic program NPEM. NPEM generated population pharmacokinetic parameter values that were used to develop a gentamicin dosing nomogram. The nomogram was tested in the next 15 patients admitted to MICU to determine accuracy. Doses given per the MICU and the Hull-Sarubbi nomograms were compared with doses based on actual patient-specific pharmacokinetic parameter values. Reliability coefficients (intraclass correlation coefficients) were calculated to assess the agreement between observations. Setting Data were gathered from patients receiving gentamicin therapy in the MICU, Presbyterian University Hospital, Pittsburgh. Patients Baseline population pharmacokinetic parameter values were determined in 36 MICU patients receiving gentamicin therapy. Patients with renal failure receiving hemodialysis or another mechanical method of blood clearance or fluid removal were excluded. The population parameter values in the form of a dosing nomogram were then used prospectively to dose gentamicin in 15 patients. Results NPEM generated population parameter values similar to those previously published using the Sawchuk-Zaske method in ICU patients. The mean volume of distribution generated using NPEM was 0.34 ± 0.12 L/kg. The relationship between creatinine clearance (Clcr) and elimination rate constant (Ke) was: Ke = 0.00218 x Clcr + 0.007. The nomogram-derived doses correlated with doses determined by using actual patient-specific pharmacokinetic values (p<0.05). The Hull-Sarubbi derived doses, however, did not correlate with patient-specific doses (p>0.05). Only one patient had a peak concentration <6 mg/L. Two of 15 patients had trough concentrations prior to the first maintenance dose >2 mg/L. Conclusions The use of NPEM to generate population-specific pharmacokinetic parameter values has been previously described. Application of population-specific dosing nomograms can improve initial dosing regimens such that conventional therapeutic concentrations can be achieved early in therapy. This nomogram, however, does not preclude follow-up patient-specific pharmacokinetic analysis.