Response to winter pressures in acute services: analysis from the Winter Society for Acute Medicine Benchmarking Audit

Background There is increased demand for urgent and acute services during the winter months, placing pressure on acute medicine services caring for emergency medical admissions. Hospital services adopt measures aiming to compensate for the effects of this increased pressure. This study aimed to describe the measures adopted by acute medicine services to address service pressures during winter. Methods A survey of acute hospitals was conducted during the Society for Acute Medicine Benchmarking Audit, a national day-of-care audit, on 30th January 2020. Survey questions were derived from national guidance. Acute medicine services at 93 hospitals in the United Kingdom completed the survey, evaluating service measures implemented to mitigate increased demand, as well as markers of increased pressure on services. Results All acute internal medicine services had undertaken measures to prepare for increased demand, however there was marked variation in the combination of measures adopted. 81.7% of hospitals had expanded the number of medical inpatient beds available. 80.4% had added extra clinical staff. The specialty of the physicians assigned to provide care for extra inpatient beds varied. A quarter of units had reduced beds available for providing Same Day Emergency Care on the day of the survey. Patients had been waiting in corridors within the emergency medicine department in 56.3% of units. Conclusion Winter pressure places considerable demand on acute services, and impacts the delivery of care. Although increased pressure on acute hospital services during winter is widely recognised, there is considerable variation in the approach to planning for these periods of increased demand.

Recognising and managing eating disorders in the emergency department

Compared with other mental health conditions or psychiatric presentations, such as self-harm, which may be seen in emergency departments, eating disorders can seem relatively rare. However, they have the highest mortality across the spectrum of mental health, with high rates of medical complications and risk, ranging from hypoglycaemia and electrolyte disturbances to cardiac abnormalities. People with eating disorders may not disclose their diagnosis when they see healthcare professionals. This can be due to denial of the condition itself, a wish to avoid treatment for a condition which may be valued, or because of the stigma attached to mental health. As a result their diagnosis can be easily missed by healthcare professionals and thus the prevalence is underappreciated. This article presents eating disorders to emergency and acute medicine practitioners from a new perspective using the combined emergency, psychiatric, nutrition and psychology lens. It focuses on the most serious acute pathology which can develop from the more common presentations; highlights indicators of hidden disease; discusses screening; suggests key acute management considerations and explores the challenge of mental capacity in a group of high-risk patients who, with the right treatment, can make a good recovery.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency department attendances and acute medical admissions

Background To better understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospital healthcare, we studied activity in the emergency department (ED) and acute medicine department of a major UK hospital. Methods Electronic patient records for all adult patients attending ED (n = 243,667) or acute medicine (n = 82,899) during the pandemic (2020–2021) and prior year (2019) were analysed and compared. We studied parameters including severity, primary diagnoses, co-morbidity, admission rate, length of stay, bed occupancy, and mortality, with a focus on non-COVID-19 diseases. Results During the first wave of the pandemic, daily ED attendance fell by 37%, medical admissions by 30% and medical bed occupancy by 27%, but all returned to normal within a year. ED attendances and medical admissions fell across all age ranges; the greatest reductions were seen for younger adults in ED attendances, but in older adults for medical admissions. Compared to non-COVID-19 pandemic admissions, COVID-19 admissions were enriched for minority ethnic groups, for dementia, obesity and diabetes, but had lower rates of malignancy. Compared to the pre-pandemic period, non-COVID-19 pandemic admissions had more hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, liver disease, and obesity. There were fewer low severity ED attendances during the pandemic and fewer medical admissions across all severity categories. There were fewer ED attendances with common non-respiratory illnesses including cardiac diagnoses, but no change in cardiac arrests. COVID-19 was the commonest diagnosis amongst medical admissions during the first wave and there were fewer diagnoses of pneumonia, myocardial infarction, heart failure, cellulitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, urinary tract infection and other sepsis, but not stroke. Levels had rebounded by a year later with a trend to higher levels of stroke than before the pandemic. During the pandemic first wave, 7-day mortality was increased for ED attendances, but not for non-COVID-19 medical admissions. Conclusions Reduced ED attendances in the first wave of the pandemic suggest opportunities for reducing low severity presentations to ED in the future, but also raise the possibility of harm from delayed or missed care. Reassuringly, recent rises in attendance and admissions indicate that any deterrent effect of the pandemic on attendance is diminishing.

Abstract 8883: Pre-hospital Physician’s Presence and Neurological Outcome Among Patients Performed Pre-hospital Advanced Airway Management: A Nationwide Multicenter Observational Study in Japan (the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine-out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Registry)

Purpose: Using the out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) registry in Japan, we evaluated the effectiveness of pre-hospital advanced airway management under physicians’ presence after adjusting in-hospital treatments. Methods: This was a multicenter cohort study. We registered all consecutive OHCA patients in Japan who, from 1 June 2014 through 31 December 2017, were transported to institutions participating in the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine OHCA Registry. We included OHCA patients performed pre-hospital advanced airway management, who were ≥18 years of age with medical etiology and who received resuscitation from emergency medical services (EMS) personnel and medical professionals in hospitals. The primary outcome was one-month favorable neurological survival.We estimated the propensity score by fitting a logistic regression model that was adjusted for several variables before the arrival of EMS personnel and/ or pre-hospital physician. A multivariable logistic regression analysis in propensity score-matched patients was used to adjust confounders including extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, percutaneous coronary intervention, intra-aortic balloon pumping, and targeted temperature management. Results: We analyzed 9,672 patients. Among them, 2.3% (N = 218) had a neurologically favorable outcome. The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of pre-hospital advanced airway management under physicians’ presence compared with their absence for primary outcome was 0.96 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61-1.51). Among first documented non-shockable cardiac rhythm, the AOR was 3.10 (95% CI: 1.05-10.77). Among first documented shockable cardiac rhythm, the AOR was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.53-1.53). Conclusion: In Japan, pre-hospital advanced airway management under physicians’ presence was not associated with one-month favorable neurological survival among patients with first documented shockable cardiac rhythm, whereas it was associated with a neurologically favorable outcome among patients with first documented non-shockable cardiac rhythm.

Emergency surgery topics

Emergency General Surgery (EGS) deals with swift assessment and management of some of the sickest patients that we treat. Many NHS hospitals are dedicating separate resources for elective and emergency care, not just in the form of Acute Medicine but recently also as Emergency General Surgery, in recognition of this1. Throughout your medical career you will encounter these patients. Whether you are reviewing a medical in-patient with a distended abdomen, or seeing patients with abdominal pain in A&E or general practice, knowledge of the diagnosis and management of these common conditions is vital in enabling the delivery of optimal emergency surgical care safely. In addition, some 20% of patients are admitted initially under the wrong speciality and require the same prompt diagnosis and care by way of early diagnosis and treatment. ES is a core competency for every doctor.

Why hemolysis detection should be an integral part of any near-patient blood gas analysis

Blood gas analysis at or near the patient’s bedside is a common practice in acute medicine and plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and management of patient’s respiratory status, metabolites, electrolytes, co-oximetry and acid–base balance. Pre-analytical quality aspects of the specimens are getting more and more attention, including the presence of potential interferences. Central laboratories have implemented technologies to detect interferences such as hemolysis, lipidemia or hyperbilirubinemia in blood samples to ensure the highest possible quality in results provided to routine care. However, systematic detection for interference due to hemolysis is currently not in place for blood gas analysis at the point-of-care (POC). To apply hemolysis detection solutions at the central laboratory, but not at the POC for blood gas analysis, is a clear contradiction when novel hemolysis detecting technologies are available. The introduction of a system that systematically detects hemolysis in connection to POC blood gas analysis would be imperative to patient safety and costs associated with potential clinical malpractice (leading to wrong, missing and/or delayed treatment) and would also ensure better compliance to CLSI guidelines and ISO standards, and be beneficial for patient and staff.

The experiences of NHS hospital acute medicine departments in England during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic

We conducted a survey exploring the experiences of NHS hospital acute medicine services in England during the 1st wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Responses were collected from 26th May to 8th July 2020. The results of 91 sites are presented. The total number of patients referred to the medical take for assessment and admitted from the medical take decreased from pre-pandemic levels compared to peak COVID-19 activity. The total number of acute medical beds decreased, however critical care beds increased by 162%. We report the median timeline from first admission of COVID-19 to when baseline critical care capacity was reached. We found regional variation across the results. These findings can assist healthcare leaders prepare for future pandemics.

Acute Medicine and Pandemics: Getting It Right Next Time!

For those of you who are not aware of what GIRFT (Getting It Right First Time) is, let me start by saying it is a brilliant idea, genius perhaps. The vision of its founder, Professor Tim Briggs CBE, was to optimise orthopaedic care by using the most clinically and cost effective treatments, minimising waste, reducing variation and eliminating poor practice. Since 2014 in orthopaedics alone, operational and financial opportunities to save the NHS £696 million have been generated. Acute medicine, coupled with general medicine, has been part of the GIRFT programme since 2017. The mischievous reader might question the name, as clearly this is about getting things right at the second time of asking at the very earliest. Apart from that pedantic note, GIRFT is a force for good.

Focused Acute Medicine Ultrasound (FAMUS): uptake, completion and barriers to accreditation after two years

The Society for Acute Medicine launched their ultrasound accreditation in September 2016, involving a practical course alongside completion of scanning competencies. Candidates require a registered supervisor to oversee their training. We present here the results of a survey of attendees of practical courses approximately 2 years after launch. The majority of respondents were Consultants or trainees within AIM. Fourteen of 76 (18.4%) respondents had completed the whole accreditation process, whilst 51 (67.1%) had not completed any of the three individual modules. The biggest barriers to accreditation were seen to be lack of supervisors, and lack of dedicated training time. There was good uptake of available online learning resources with good feedback. These results will be used to help develop the training pathway further and widen access to ultrasound training within the specialty and beyond.