phase contrast microscopy
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

625
(FIVE YEARS 17)

H-INDEX

42
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2022 ◽  
Vol 147 ◽  
pp. 107631
Author(s):  
Charlotte Kyeremah ◽  
Jeffrey La ◽  
Mohamed Amine Gharbi ◽  
Chandra S. Yelleswarapu

2021 ◽  
Vol 945 (1) ◽  
pp. 012024
Author(s):  
Der Sheng Tan ◽  
Danyal Mahmood ◽  
Humaira Nisar ◽  
Kim Ho Yeap ◽  
Veerendra Dakulagi ◽  
...  

Abstract Activated sludge (AS) is a type of process which is commonly used for the treatment of sewage and industrial wastewater. In this treatment process, the settling of the sludge flocs is important to ensure the normal functioning of the system, while sludge bulking has become a common and long-term problem that greatly affects floc settleability. Thus, methods based on image processing and analysis are introduced for monitoring AS wastewater treatment plants. However, the effectiveness of using image processing methods heavily depends on the performance of segmentation algorithms. The AS wastewater plant can be monitored through microscopic images of the flocs and filaments. Water samples are taken from the aeration tank of the wastewater plants and then observed using bright field and phase-contrast microscopy to compare the segmentation accuracy at different magnifications i.e., 4x, 10x, 20x, 40x. In this paper, three methods to segment and quantify the flocs in bright field and phase-contrast microscopy images have been analyzed. The first method is image segmentation using Bradley local thresholding method, the second method is texture segmentation using range filtering and Otsu’s thresholding and the third method is Gaussian Mixture Method based segmentation. The experimental results show that Gaussian Mixture Model Method gives the best segmentation accuracy for bright-field microscopy and 10x magnification gives the best results.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 4985
Author(s):  
Gianluigi Caccianiga ◽  
Gérard Rey ◽  
Paolo Caccianiga ◽  
Alessandro Leonida ◽  
Marco Baldoni ◽  
...  

The aim of this study was to evaluate two different kinds of rough implant surface and to assess their tendency to peri-implantitis disease, with a follow-up of more than 10 years. Data were obtained from a cluster of 500 implants with Ti-Unite surface and 1000 implants with Ossean surface, with a minimum follow-up of 10 years. Implants had been inserted both in pristine bone and regenerated bone. We registered incidence of peri-implantitis and other causes of implant loss. All patients agreed with the following maintenance protocol: sonic brush with vertical movement (Broxo), interdental brushes, and oral irrigators (Broxo) at least two times every day. For all patients with implants, we evaluated subgingival plaque samples by phase-contrast microscopy every 4 months for a period of more than 10-years. Ti-Unite surface implants underwent peri-implantitis in 1.6% of the total number of implants inserted and Ossean surface implants showed peri-implantitis in 1.5% of the total number of implants. The total percentage of implant lost was 4% for Ti-Unite surfaces and 3.6% for Ossean surfaces. Strict control of implants leads to low percentage of peri-implantitis even for rough surfaces dental implants.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soheil Mojiri ◽  
Sebastian Isbaner ◽  
Steffen Mühle ◽  
Hongje Jang ◽  
Albert Johann Bae ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document